Federal Employees’ Compensation Act and Mandating the Use of X-ray for Chiropractic Management of Federal Employees: An Exploration of Concerns and a Call to Action
Jeff J. Askew DC , Karl C. Kranz DC, Esq , Wayne M. Whalen DC
{"title":"Federal Employees’ Compensation Act and Mandating the Use of X-ray for Chiropractic Management of Federal Employees: An Exploration of Concerns and a Call to Action","authors":"Jeff J. Askew DC , Karl C. Kranz DC, Esq , Wayne M. Whalen DC","doi":"10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The purpose of this article is to explore concerns regarding sections of the federal workers’ compensation law that apply to the treatment and management of work-related injuries of federal employees by </span>chiropractors, and to offer a call to action for change.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p><span><span>A 1974 amendment to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) stipulates that chiropractic services rendered to injured federal workers are reimbursable. However, the only reimbursable chiropractic treatment is “manual manipulation of the spine to correct a </span>subluxation<span> as demonstrated by X-ray to exist.” This means the chiropractor must take radiographs in order to be reimbursed. As with other health care<span> professions, chiropractors are expected to practice according to best practices guided by studies in the scientific literature. Yet in the federal workers’ compensation arena, this law requires chiropractors to practice in a manner that is fiscally wasteful, contradicts current </span></span></span>radiology<span> standards, and may expose patients to unnecessary X-ray radiation. Presently, there is discord between what the law mandates, chiropractic training and scope, and what professional guidelines recommend. In this article we discuss how FECA creates problems in the following 7 categories: direct harm, indirect harm, contradiction of best practices, ethical dilemma, barriers to conservative treatment, fiscal waste, and discrimination.</span></p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The 1974 FECA provision requiring chiropractors to take radiographs regardless of presenting medical necessity should be updated to reflect current chiropractic education, training, and best practice. To resolve this discrepancy, we suggest that the radiographic requirement and the limitations placed on chiropractic physicians should be removed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39103,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","volume":"27 ","pages":"Pages 11-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.echu.2020.10.005","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chiropractic Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S155634992030005X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this article is to explore concerns regarding sections of the federal workers’ compensation law that apply to the treatment and management of work-related injuries of federal employees by chiropractors, and to offer a call to action for change.
Discussion
A 1974 amendment to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA) stipulates that chiropractic services rendered to injured federal workers are reimbursable. However, the only reimbursable chiropractic treatment is “manual manipulation of the spine to correct a subluxation as demonstrated by X-ray to exist.” This means the chiropractor must take radiographs in order to be reimbursed. As with other health care professions, chiropractors are expected to practice according to best practices guided by studies in the scientific literature. Yet in the federal workers’ compensation arena, this law requires chiropractors to practice in a manner that is fiscally wasteful, contradicts current radiology standards, and may expose patients to unnecessary X-ray radiation. Presently, there is discord between what the law mandates, chiropractic training and scope, and what professional guidelines recommend. In this article we discuss how FECA creates problems in the following 7 categories: direct harm, indirect harm, contradiction of best practices, ethical dilemma, barriers to conservative treatment, fiscal waste, and discrimination.
Conclusion
The 1974 FECA provision requiring chiropractors to take radiographs regardless of presenting medical necessity should be updated to reflect current chiropractic education, training, and best practice. To resolve this discrepancy, we suggest that the radiographic requirement and the limitations placed on chiropractic physicians should be removed.