Sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: a literature review on the use of conservative surgery techniques.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine
Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-03 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04634-1
Francesco Plotti, Giuseppe Messina, Corrado Terranova, Roberto Montera, Carlo De Cicco Nardone, Federica Guzzo, Daniela Luvero, Alessandra Gatti, Teresa Schirò, Gianmarco Rossini, Cristiana De Luca, Fernando Ficarola, Laura Feole, Roberto Angioli
{"title":"Sentinel lymph node in cervical cancer: a literature review on the use of conservative surgery techniques.","authors":"Francesco Plotti,&nbsp;Giuseppe Messina,&nbsp;Corrado Terranova,&nbsp;Roberto Montera,&nbsp;Carlo De Cicco Nardone,&nbsp;Federica Guzzo,&nbsp;Daniela Luvero,&nbsp;Alessandra Gatti,&nbsp;Teresa Schirò,&nbsp;Gianmarco Rossini,&nbsp;Cristiana De Luca,&nbsp;Fernando Ficarola,&nbsp;Laura Feole,&nbsp;Roberto Angioli","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04634-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sentinel lymph node detection is a surgical procedure that allow to avoid systematic lymphadenectomy in those tumors in early stage where lymph node spread is not sure. If the sentinel lymph node is not involved by tumor in 98-99% of case other lymph nodes are clean. The reason why less radical surgery is chosen is linked to the lower postoperative morbidity rate, the risk of lower limb lymphedema decreases. The aim of this review was to summarize what is the state of art of using the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLD) technique and what are the future goals to improve the safety and the reliability.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We have conducted a review of the literature of the past 10 years to understand the attitudes of oncologist gynecologists in the world to the conservative treatment of cervical cancer. We only selected articles from 2010 onwards, which meet the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>The detection rate varies from 83% to 100%. The bilateral detection rate, on the other hand, varies from 42% to 100%. The false negative rate ranges from 4% to 12%. Sensitivity varies from 20.7% (considering the frozen section) to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Indocyanine green is the most reliable and performing tracer for the search of the sentinel lymph node; that the false intraoperative negative rate is too high to be sure not to subject the patient to an incorrect therapeutic procedure; data concerning the safety and survival of conservative lymphadenectomy (SLND) compared to systematic lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature and therefore we are awaiting the results of the two ongoing randomized clinical trials that will allow us to have more significant scientific data.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":"72 6","pages":"391-398"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04634-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node detection is a surgical procedure that allow to avoid systematic lymphadenectomy in those tumors in early stage where lymph node spread is not sure. If the sentinel lymph node is not involved by tumor in 98-99% of case other lymph nodes are clean. The reason why less radical surgery is chosen is linked to the lower postoperative morbidity rate, the risk of lower limb lymphedema decreases. The aim of this review was to summarize what is the state of art of using the sentinel lymph node dissection (SLD) technique and what are the future goals to improve the safety and the reliability.

Evidence acquisition: We have conducted a review of the literature of the past 10 years to understand the attitudes of oncologist gynecologists in the world to the conservative treatment of cervical cancer. We only selected articles from 2010 onwards, which meet the inclusion criteria.

Evidence synthesis: The detection rate varies from 83% to 100%. The bilateral detection rate, on the other hand, varies from 42% to 100%. The false negative rate ranges from 4% to 12%. Sensitivity varies from 20.7% (considering the frozen section) to 100%.

Conclusions: Indocyanine green is the most reliable and performing tracer for the search of the sentinel lymph node; that the false intraoperative negative rate is too high to be sure not to subject the patient to an incorrect therapeutic procedure; data concerning the safety and survival of conservative lymphadenectomy (SLND) compared to systematic lymphadenectomy are still lacking in the literature and therefore we are awaiting the results of the two ongoing randomized clinical trials that will allow us to have more significant scientific data.

宫颈癌前哨淋巴结:保守手术技术应用的文献综述。
前哨淋巴结检测是一种外科手术,可以避免在淋巴结扩散不确定的早期肿瘤进行系统性淋巴结切除术。如果前哨淋巴结没有被肿瘤累及,98-99%的病例中其他淋巴结是干净的。选择较少根治性手术的原因与术后发病率较低有关,下肢淋巴水肿的风险降低。本文的目的是总结前哨淋巴结清扫(SLD)技术的应用现状,以及提高其安全性和可靠性的未来目标。证据获取:我们对近10年的文献进行了回顾,了解世界各国肿瘤学家妇科医生对宫颈癌保守治疗的态度。我们只选择了2010年以后符合纳入标准的文章。证据综合:检出率从83%到100%不等。另一方面,双侧检出率从42%到100%不等。假阴性率从4%到12%不等。灵敏度从20.7%(考虑冷冻切片)到100%不等。结论:吲哚菁绿是寻找前哨淋巴结最可靠、最有效的示踪剂;术中假阴性率太高,无法确保不使患者接受错误的治疗程序;关于保守性淋巴结切除术(SLND)与系统性淋巴结切除术相比的安全性和生存率的数据在文献中仍然缺乏,因此我们正在等待两项正在进行的随机临床试验的结果,这将使我们获得更有意义的科学数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信