A validation study for a clinical decision rule for acute wrist injury.

Anne Brants, Berwout van der Woude, Michiel IJsseldijk, Dan Thao Vy, René Verbeek
{"title":"A validation study for a clinical decision rule for acute wrist injury.","authors":"Anne Brants,&nbsp;Berwout van der Woude,&nbsp;Michiel IJsseldijk,&nbsp;Dan Thao Vy,&nbsp;René Verbeek","doi":"10.1007/s00068-020-01474-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Acute wrist injury is a common reason for visiting the emergency department. To date, there are no implemented clinical decision rules to predict a fracture in this group of patients. We previously identified six clinical predictors in adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The aim of this study was to validate these predictors as a decision rule in a validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department at five hospitals in the Netherlands and included adults with acute wrist injury. All collaborating physicians performed a standardized physical examination and data were collected in a case report form. The main outcome was defined as the radiographic presence of a wrist fracture. Six clinical variables that were significantly associated with a fracture (ρ < 0.01) were included in a model to develop the clinical decision rule.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 493 fractures in 724 patients were identified by radiographic assessment. Almost all of the clinical variables were associated with the presence of a fracture. Our decision rule had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) with a specificity of 0.26 (95% CI 0.20-0.32) in this validation cohort. Application of the decision rule resulted in a reduction in radiographic assessment rate of 10% at the cost of missing 2% of the fractures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision rule showed a high sensitivity and low specificity, possible due to the high pre-test probability of a wrist fracture in the cohort. Our study needs further validation in other populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":520620,"journal":{"name":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","volume":" ","pages":"4319-4325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00068-020-01474-2","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01474-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: Acute wrist injury is a common reason for visiting the emergency department. To date, there are no implemented clinical decision rules to predict a fracture in this group of patients. We previously identified six clinical predictors in adult patients with acute wrist trauma. The aim of this study was to validate these predictors as a decision rule in a validation cohort.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in the emergency department at five hospitals in the Netherlands and included adults with acute wrist injury. All collaborating physicians performed a standardized physical examination and data were collected in a case report form. The main outcome was defined as the radiographic presence of a wrist fracture. Six clinical variables that were significantly associated with a fracture (ρ < 0.01) were included in a model to develop the clinical decision rule.

Results: A total of 493 fractures in 724 patients were identified by radiographic assessment. Almost all of the clinical variables were associated with the presence of a fracture. Our decision rule had a sensitivity of 0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99) with a specificity of 0.26 (95% CI 0.20-0.32) in this validation cohort. Application of the decision rule resulted in a reduction in radiographic assessment rate of 10% at the cost of missing 2% of the fractures.

Conclusion: The decision rule showed a high sensitivity and low specificity, possible due to the high pre-test probability of a wrist fracture in the cohort. Our study needs further validation in other populations.

急性腕损伤临床决策规则的验证研究。
目的:急性手腕损伤是急诊科就诊的常见原因。到目前为止,还没有实施临床决策规则来预测这组患者的骨折。我们先前确定了急性腕外伤成人患者的六个临床预测因素。本研究的目的是在验证队列中验证这些预测因子作为决策规则。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究在荷兰五家医院的急诊科进行,包括急性手腕损伤的成年人。所有合作医生都进行了标准化体检,并将数据收集到病例报告表中。主要结果被定义为腕关节骨折的影像学表现。结果:724例患者共493例骨折通过x线评估。几乎所有的临床变量都与骨折有关。在该验证队列中,我们的决策规则的敏感性为0.97 (95% CI 0.96-0.99),特异性为0.26 (95% CI 0.20-0.32)。该决策规则的应用使x线片评估率降低了10%,但损失了2%的骨折。结论:该决策规则敏感性高,特异性低,可能是由于该队列中腕部骨折的预测概率较高。我们的研究需要在其他人群中进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信