Psychosocial safety climate and stigma: Reporting stress-related concerns at work.

Zachary Klinefelter, Robert R Sinclair, Thomas W Britt, Gargi Sawhney, Kristen Jennings Black, Alec Munc
{"title":"Psychosocial safety climate and stigma: Reporting stress-related concerns at work.","authors":"Zachary Klinefelter,&nbsp;Robert R Sinclair,&nbsp;Thomas W Britt,&nbsp;Gargi Sawhney,&nbsp;Kristen Jennings Black,&nbsp;Alec Munc","doi":"10.1002/smi.3010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While researchers have begun to investigate theory and methods related to attenuating stress-related issues at work, one underexplored area is a barrier to reporting stress-related concerns in the workplace. Research on organizational climate broadly covers psychosocial safety at work. However, the literature has not examined other, more specific factors such as stigma towards reporting stress-related concerns in the workplace. Using a prospective design, the current study examined the distinction between psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and stigmas surrounding reporting stress that may exist in organizations. Furthermore, we investigated whether PSC would buffer against the effects of such stigmas. The findings of this study indicate that stigma and PSC are distinct and can independently predict psychosocial outcomes. The results also indicate that PSC may play a role in attenuating the effects of these stigmas on some psychosocial outcomes. Implications and potential avenues for future research in this area are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":309674,"journal":{"name":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","volume":" ","pages":"488-503"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/smi.3010","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

While researchers have begun to investigate theory and methods related to attenuating stress-related issues at work, one underexplored area is a barrier to reporting stress-related concerns in the workplace. Research on organizational climate broadly covers psychosocial safety at work. However, the literature has not examined other, more specific factors such as stigma towards reporting stress-related concerns in the workplace. Using a prospective design, the current study examined the distinction between psychosocial safety climate (PSC) and stigmas surrounding reporting stress that may exist in organizations. Furthermore, we investigated whether PSC would buffer against the effects of such stigmas. The findings of this study indicate that stigma and PSC are distinct and can independently predict psychosocial outcomes. The results also indicate that PSC may play a role in attenuating the effects of these stigmas on some psychosocial outcomes. Implications and potential avenues for future research in this area are discussed.

社会心理安全气候和耻辱:报告工作中与压力相关的担忧。
虽然研究人员已经开始研究与减轻工作中压力相关问题相关的理论和方法,但一个未被开发的领域是报告工作场所压力相关问题的障碍。对组织氛围的研究广泛地涵盖了工作中的社会心理安全。然而,这些文献并没有研究其他更具体的因素,比如在工作场所报告压力相关问题时的耻辱感。本研究采用前瞻性设计,考察了社会心理安全气候(PSC)与组织中可能存在的压力报告耻辱感之间的区别。此外,我们研究了PSC是否会缓冲这些柱头的影响。本研究结果表明,病耻感和PSC是不同的,可以独立预测心理社会结局。研究结果还表明,PSC可能在减轻这些耻辱感对某些社会心理结果的影响方面发挥作用。讨论了该领域未来研究的意义和可能的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信