Older adults' use of an online decision support system: Usability and stability of assistive technology recommendations.

Claudine Auger, W Ben Mortenson, Jeffrey W Jutai, Noemie Seguin-Tremblay, Vanessa Chenel, Manon Guay
{"title":"Older adults' use of an online decision support system: Usability and stability of assistive technology recommendations.","authors":"Claudine Auger,&nbsp;W Ben Mortenson,&nbsp;Jeffrey W Jutai,&nbsp;Noemie Seguin-Tremblay,&nbsp;Vanessa Chenel,&nbsp;Manon Guay","doi":"10.1080/10400435.2020.1815251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online decision support systems (DSS) may help older adults self-select assistive technology (AT) by offering recommendations. User interactions with DSSs may change the recommendations they receive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated recommendations stability and usability of an online DSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Middle-aged and older adults (n = 43) were observed while using the DSS. The stability of DSS recommendations (ATs and advice) was compared between two time points, using a three-point scale: no, partial, or full agreement. Usability was coded, referencing ISO standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (51%) of participants received AT recommendations from the DSS in both sessions, with full (14%) or partial (12%) agreement. All but one participant received advice, and almost all of them had full (40%) or partial (56%) agreement between sessions. Many of the usability issues appear to be the result of the users inaccurately measuring their environment, challenges in understanding the questions being asked, and improperly making selections from the system.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Strict AT matching rules versus generic advice, and usability issues, likely reduced the matching rate and stability of AT recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It appears that some users may require assistance with the system, and we suggest changes to the DSS format and content to improve stability and usability.</p>","PeriodicalId":282300,"journal":{"name":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","volume":" ","pages":"316-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10400435.2020.1815251","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2020.1815251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Online decision support systems (DSS) may help older adults self-select assistive technology (AT) by offering recommendations. User interactions with DSSs may change the recommendations they receive.

Objective: We evaluated recommendations stability and usability of an online DSS.

Methods: Middle-aged and older adults (n = 43) were observed while using the DSS. The stability of DSS recommendations (ATs and advice) was compared between two time points, using a three-point scale: no, partial, or full agreement. Usability was coded, referencing ISO standards.

Results: Half (51%) of participants received AT recommendations from the DSS in both sessions, with full (14%) or partial (12%) agreement. All but one participant received advice, and almost all of them had full (40%) or partial (56%) agreement between sessions. Many of the usability issues appear to be the result of the users inaccurately measuring their environment, challenges in understanding the questions being asked, and improperly making selections from the system.

Discussion: Strict AT matching rules versus generic advice, and usability issues, likely reduced the matching rate and stability of AT recommendations.

Conclusion: It appears that some users may require assistance with the system, and we suggest changes to the DSS format and content to improve stability and usability.

老年人使用在线决策支持系统:辅助技术建议的可用性和稳定性。
在线决策支持系统(DSS)可以通过提供建议来帮助老年人自我选择辅助技术(AT)。用户与决策支持系统的交互可能会改变他们收到的建议。目的:评估在线决策支持系统的稳定性和可用性。方法:对43例使用DSS的中老年患者进行观察。DSS建议(ATs和建议)的稳定性在两个时间点之间进行比较,使用三点量表:不同意、部分同意或完全同意。参考ISO标准,对可用性进行编码。结果:一半(51%)的参与者在两次会议中都接受了DSS的AT建议,完全(14%)或部分(12%)同意。除了一名参与者外,所有人都接受了建议,而且几乎所有人在两次会议之间都完全(40%)或部分(56%)同意。许多可用性问题似乎是由于用户不准确地测量他们的环境,在理解所问的问题时遇到挑战,以及不正确地从系统中做出选择。讨论:严格的AT匹配规则与通用建议,以及可用性问题,可能会降低AT推荐的匹配率和稳定性。结论:似乎有些用户可能需要系统的帮助,我们建议改变DSS的格式和内容,以提高稳定性和可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信