Pregnancy Outcome Patterns of Medicaid-Eligible Women, 1999-2014: A National Prospective Longitudinal Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2020-07-31 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2333392820941348
James Studnicki, John W Fisher, David C Reardon, Christopher Craver, Tessa Longbons, Donna J Harrison
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcome Patterns of Medicaid-Eligible Women, 1999-2014: A National Prospective Longitudinal Study.","authors":"James Studnicki,&nbsp;John W Fisher,&nbsp;David C Reardon,&nbsp;Christopher Craver,&nbsp;Tessa Longbons,&nbsp;Donna J Harrison","doi":"10.1177/2333392820941348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The number and outcomes of pregnancies experienced by a woman are consequential determinants of her health status. However, there is no published research comparing the patterns of subsequent pregnancy outcomes following a live birth, natural fetal loss, or induced abortion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this study was to describe the characteristic patterns of subsequent pregnancy outcomes evolving from each of three initiating outcome events (birth, induced abortion, natural fetal loss) occurring in a Medicaid population fully insured for all reproductive health services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified 7,388,842 pregnancy outcomes occurring to Medicaid-eligible women in the 17 states which paid for abortion services between 1999-2014. The first known pregnancy outcome for each woman was marked as the index outcome which assigned each woman to one of three cohorts. All subsequent outcomes occurring up to the fifth known pregnancy were identified. Analyses of the three index outcome cohorts were conducted separately for all pregnancy outcomes, three age bands (<17, 17-35, 36+), and three race/ethnicity groups (Hispanic, Black, White).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with index abortions experienced more lifetime pregnancies than women with index births or natural fetal losses and were increasingly more likely to experience another pregnancy with each subsequent pregnancy. Women whose index pregnancy ended in abortion were also increasingly more likely to experience another abortion at each subsequent pregnancy. Both births and natural fetal losses were likely to result in a subsequent birth, rather than abortion. Women with natural losses were increasingly more likely to have a subsequent birth than women with an index birth. All age and racial/ethnic groups exhibited the characteristic pattern we have described for all pregnancy outcomes: abortion is associated with more subsequent pregnancies and abortions; births and fetal losses are associated with subsequent births. Other differences between groups are, however, apparent. Age is positively associated with the likelihood of a birth following an index birth, but negatively associated with the likelihood of a birth following an index abortion. Hispanic women are always more likely to have a birth and less likely to have an abortion than Black or White women, for all combinations of index outcome and the number of subsequent pregnancies. Similarly, Black women are always more likely to have an abortion and less likely to experience a birth than Hispanic or White women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women experiencing repeated pregnancies and subsequent abortions following an index abortion are subjected to an increased exposure to hemorrhage and infection, the major causes of maternal mortality, and other adverse consequences resulting from multiple separation events.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"7 ","pages":"2333392820941348"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2333392820941348","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392820941348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: The number and outcomes of pregnancies experienced by a woman are consequential determinants of her health status. However, there is no published research comparing the patterns of subsequent pregnancy outcomes following a live birth, natural fetal loss, or induced abortion.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the characteristic patterns of subsequent pregnancy outcomes evolving from each of three initiating outcome events (birth, induced abortion, natural fetal loss) occurring in a Medicaid population fully insured for all reproductive health services.

Methods: We identified 7,388,842 pregnancy outcomes occurring to Medicaid-eligible women in the 17 states which paid for abortion services between 1999-2014. The first known pregnancy outcome for each woman was marked as the index outcome which assigned each woman to one of three cohorts. All subsequent outcomes occurring up to the fifth known pregnancy were identified. Analyses of the three index outcome cohorts were conducted separately for all pregnancy outcomes, three age bands (<17, 17-35, 36+), and three race/ethnicity groups (Hispanic, Black, White).

Results: Women with index abortions experienced more lifetime pregnancies than women with index births or natural fetal losses and were increasingly more likely to experience another pregnancy with each subsequent pregnancy. Women whose index pregnancy ended in abortion were also increasingly more likely to experience another abortion at each subsequent pregnancy. Both births and natural fetal losses were likely to result in a subsequent birth, rather than abortion. Women with natural losses were increasingly more likely to have a subsequent birth than women with an index birth. All age and racial/ethnic groups exhibited the characteristic pattern we have described for all pregnancy outcomes: abortion is associated with more subsequent pregnancies and abortions; births and fetal losses are associated with subsequent births. Other differences between groups are, however, apparent. Age is positively associated with the likelihood of a birth following an index birth, but negatively associated with the likelihood of a birth following an index abortion. Hispanic women are always more likely to have a birth and less likely to have an abortion than Black or White women, for all combinations of index outcome and the number of subsequent pregnancies. Similarly, Black women are always more likely to have an abortion and less likely to experience a birth than Hispanic or White women.

Conclusion: Women experiencing repeated pregnancies and subsequent abortions following an index abortion are subjected to an increased exposure to hemorrhage and infection, the major causes of maternal mortality, and other adverse consequences resulting from multiple separation events.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

1999-2014年参保妇女妊娠结局模式:一项全国前瞻性纵向研究
导言:妇女怀孕的次数和结果是其健康状况的重要决定因素。然而,目前还没有发表的研究比较活产、自然流产或人工流产后妊娠结局的模式。目的:本研究的目的是描述在医疗补助人群中发生的所有生殖健康服务完全保险的三种初始结果事件(分娩、人工流产、自然胎儿丢失)中发生的后续妊娠结局的特征模式。方法:我们确定了1999-2014年间在17个州支付堕胎服务的符合医疗补助条件的妇女的7388,842例妊娠结局。每个妇女的第一个已知妊娠结局被标记为指数结果,将每个妇女分配到三个队列中的一个。所有随后发生的结果,直到第五次已知妊娠被确定。对三个指标结局队列分别进行了所有妊娠结局、三个年龄组的分析(结果:指标流产的妇女比指标分娩或自然流产的妇女经历了更多的终生妊娠,并且在随后的每次妊娠中更有可能再次妊娠。)第一次怀孕以流产告终的妇女在随后的每次怀孕中再次流产的可能性也越来越大。分娩和自然流产都可能导致后续分娩,而不是流产。自然生育的女性比指数生育的女性更有可能再次生育。所有年龄和种族/民族群体都表现出我们描述的所有妊娠结局的特征模式:流产与更多的后续妊娠和流产相关;分娩和胎儿损失与后续分娩有关。然而,两组之间的其他差异是显而易见的。年龄与指数分娩后分娩的可能性呈正相关,但与指数流产后分娩的可能性负相关。在所有指标结果和随后怀孕的次数的组合中,西班牙裔女性总是比黑人或白人女性更有可能生育,而堕胎的可能性更小。同样,与西班牙裔或白人女性相比,黑人女性流产的可能性更大,分娩的可能性更小。结论:多次分离事件导致的出血和感染、孕产妇死亡的主要原因以及其他不良后果,在指数流产后经历多次妊娠和随后流产的妇女更易遭受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信