Heritability of mandibular asymmetries in sagittal direction: A cephalometric study.

Q2 Dentistry
Stomatologija Pub Date : 2020-01-01
Ingrida Rakauskaite, Vilma Svalkauskiene, Zygimantas Labanauskas, Donata Juozėnaitė, Giedrė Trakinienė, Justina Vaiciuniene
{"title":"Heritability of mandibular asymmetries in sagittal direction: A cephalometric study.","authors":"Ingrida Rakauskaite,&nbsp;Vilma Svalkauskiene,&nbsp;Zygimantas Labanauskas,&nbsp;Donata Juozėnaitė,&nbsp;Giedrė Trakinienė,&nbsp;Justina Vaiciuniene","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim of the work: </strong>If we figure out mandible asymmetry etiology, we can inspire further scientific research, create more effective treatment schemas and recommend means of prophylaxis that could stop mandible asymmetry development. The aim of this work was to analyze monozygotic and dizygotic twins' mandibular asymmetry in sagittal direction using cephalometric data and to analyze its dependence of genetic and environmental factors.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Study sample consisted of 80 dizygotic (DZ) and 80 monozygotic (MZ) twins of same sex. 3 cephalometric measurements were made to determine mandible asymmetry in sagittal direction. Indexes of mandibular asymmetry (IMA1, IMA2) were calculated. Data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel (2013). Genetic and environmental factors influencing mandible asymmetry was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mandibular dental asymmetry was bigger in monozygotic twins' group but the results were not statistically significant. Mandibular skeletal asymmetry was significantly bigger in dizygotic twins' group: IMA1(DZ)=3.05±1.94, IMA1(MZ)=1.92±1.05, p=0.005. IMA2(DZ)=3.12±2.04, IMA2(MZ)=1.88±1.04, p=0.004. Distance between distal borders of the ramus is mostly determined by genetic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>1. Mandibular skeletal asymmetry was significantly bigger in dizygotic twins' group. Mandibular dental asymmetry and symmetry did not differ in groups significantly. 2. Skeletal mandible's asymmetry is more determined by genetics than environmental factors, but lower molars' sagittal position is determined more by environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":35508,"journal":{"name":"Stomatologija","volume":"22 2","pages":"54-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stomatologija","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim of the work: If we figure out mandible asymmetry etiology, we can inspire further scientific research, create more effective treatment schemas and recommend means of prophylaxis that could stop mandible asymmetry development. The aim of this work was to analyze monozygotic and dizygotic twins' mandibular asymmetry in sagittal direction using cephalometric data and to analyze its dependence of genetic and environmental factors.

Material and methods: Study sample consisted of 80 dizygotic (DZ) and 80 monozygotic (MZ) twins of same sex. 3 cephalometric measurements were made to determine mandible asymmetry in sagittal direction. Indexes of mandibular asymmetry (IMA1, IMA2) were calculated. Data analysis was done using Microsoft Excel (2013). Genetic and environmental factors influencing mandible asymmetry was determined.

Results: Mandibular dental asymmetry was bigger in monozygotic twins' group but the results were not statistically significant. Mandibular skeletal asymmetry was significantly bigger in dizygotic twins' group: IMA1(DZ)=3.05±1.94, IMA1(MZ)=1.92±1.05, p=0.005. IMA2(DZ)=3.12±2.04, IMA2(MZ)=1.88±1.04, p=0.004. Distance between distal borders of the ramus is mostly determined by genetic factors.

Conclusions: 1. Mandibular skeletal asymmetry was significantly bigger in dizygotic twins' group. Mandibular dental asymmetry and symmetry did not differ in groups significantly. 2. Skeletal mandible's asymmetry is more determined by genetics than environmental factors, but lower molars' sagittal position is determined more by environment.

矢状方向下颌不对称的遗传性:一项头位测量研究。
工作目的:如果我们能找出下颌骨不对称的病因,我们可以启发进一步的科学研究,创造更有效的治疗方案和建议预防手段,可以阻止下颌骨不对称的发展。本研究目的是利用头颅测量数据分析同卵双胞胎和异卵双胞胎的下颌矢状方向不对称,并分析其对遗传和环境因素的依赖性。材料与方法:研究样本为80对同性别的双卵(DZ)和单卵(MZ)双胞胎。3次颅面测量确定下颌矢状方向不对称。计算下颌不对称指数(IMA1, IMA2)。数据分析使用Microsoft Excel(2013)完成。确定影响下颌骨不对称的遗传和环境因素。结果:同卵双生儿组下颌骨不对称较大,但差异无统计学意义。异卵双生儿组下颌骨骼不对称更明显:IMA1(DZ)=3.05±1.94,IMA1(MZ)=1.92±1.05,p=0.005。IMA2(DZ)=3.12±2.04,IMA2(MZ)=1.88±1.04,p=0.004。分支远端边界之间的距离主要由遗传因素决定。结论:1。下颌骨不对称在异卵双胞胎组明显更大。下颌牙体不对称和对称组间差异无统计学意义。2. 下颌骨的不对称主要受遗传因素的影响而非环境因素的影响,而下磨牙矢状位主要受环境因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stomatologija
Stomatologija Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信