"Time to Try Something New" - Professionals' Experiences and Reflections on Suicide Prevention in Norway.

Crisis Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-26 DOI:10.1027/0227-5910/a000740
Kristin Espeland, Birthe Loa Knizek, Heidi Hjelmeland
{"title":"\"Time to Try Something New\" - Professionals' Experiences and Reflections on Suicide Prevention in Norway.","authors":"Kristin Espeland,&nbsp;Birthe Loa Knizek,&nbsp;Heidi Hjelmeland","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The suicide rate in Norway has remained relatively stable despite 25 years of government-funded suicide prevention efforts. <i>Aim:</i> We aimed to gather experiences of the professionals responsible for implementing suicide prevention action plans and guidelines and/or involved in relevant research. <i>Method:</i> We conducted semistructured interviews with 22 professionals about their reflections on the priorities and work done so far as well as where to go next. Data were analyzed by means of thematic analysis. <i>Results:</i> The participants described conflicting understandings and a monopolization of \"the truth\" within the suicide prevention community. They perceived the dominant biomedical understanding of suicidality and appurtenant approach to suicide prevention as too narrow. Thus, they found the suicide prevention work and collaboration challenging and recommend that it is time to try something new. <i>Limitations:</i> This study was conducted in a Norwegian context. A biomedical approach to suicide prevention is, however, common internationally. <i>Conclusion:</i> Participants described several challenges in the suicide prevention work. The contemporary \"regime of truth\" limits how suicide is understood and studied, as well as how suicide prevention is approached. A more open approach to suicide prevention, emphasizing the importance of relationships, context, and collaboration between sectors, is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":520108,"journal":{"name":"Crisis","volume":" ","pages":"434-440"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The suicide rate in Norway has remained relatively stable despite 25 years of government-funded suicide prevention efforts. Aim: We aimed to gather experiences of the professionals responsible for implementing suicide prevention action plans and guidelines and/or involved in relevant research. Method: We conducted semistructured interviews with 22 professionals about their reflections on the priorities and work done so far as well as where to go next. Data were analyzed by means of thematic analysis. Results: The participants described conflicting understandings and a monopolization of "the truth" within the suicide prevention community. They perceived the dominant biomedical understanding of suicidality and appurtenant approach to suicide prevention as too narrow. Thus, they found the suicide prevention work and collaboration challenging and recommend that it is time to try something new. Limitations: This study was conducted in a Norwegian context. A biomedical approach to suicide prevention is, however, common internationally. Conclusion: Participants described several challenges in the suicide prevention work. The contemporary "regime of truth" limits how suicide is understood and studied, as well as how suicide prevention is approached. A more open approach to suicide prevention, emphasizing the importance of relationships, context, and collaboration between sectors, is recommended.

“是时候尝试新事物了”-挪威专业人士预防自杀的经验与思考。
背景:挪威的自杀率一直保持相对稳定,尽管25年来政府资助了自杀预防工作。目的:我们旨在收集负责实施自杀预防行动计划和指南和/或参与相关研究的专业人员的经验。方法:我们对22位专业人士进行了半结构化访谈,了解他们对工作重点、目前所做的工作以及下一步工作的看法。数据采用专题分析的方法进行分析。结果:参与者描述了自杀预防社区中相互矛盾的理解和对“真相”的垄断。他们认为主导的生物医学对自杀的理解和自杀预防的辅助方法过于狭隘。因此,他们发现自杀预防工作和合作具有挑战性,并建议是时候尝试一些新的东西了。局限性:本研究是在挪威背景下进行的。然而,生物医学方法预防自杀在国际上是普遍的。结论:参与者描述了自杀预防工作中的几个挑战。当代的“真理政权”限制了人们如何理解和研究自杀,以及如何预防自杀。建议采取更开放的自杀预防方法,强调各部门之间的关系、背景和合作的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书