Youth in a viral age: a collated auto-ethnographic response by young people (dis)orientated in strange times.

Rosalie Jones McVey, Izzy Clancy, Anna Curzon Price, Stella Rose Hall Dixon, Jiayu Qiu, Mingwei Song
{"title":"Youth in a viral age: a collated auto-ethnographic response by young people (dis)orientated in strange times.","authors":"Rosalie Jones McVey, Izzy Clancy, Anna Curzon Price, Stella Rose Hall Dixon, Jiayu Qiu, Mingwei Song","doi":"10.1111/1469-8676.12815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our experiences of COVID‐19 have caused us to reflect on youth as an orientation in time. Writing as mostly undergraduates from Cambridge University, before COVID‐19, we lived among expectations that young people’s time should be sociable, memorable, ambitious and self‐discovering. The modern world watches young people for evidence of ‘potential’ in a way that is both exciting and stifling. Young people’s actions are like timepieces: they act as measures for the emergence of new worlds. We might have been forging the future or allowing societal degradation: either way, our actions were timely. Since COVID‐19, our potential futures have been threatened and suspended. ‘Young people are at less risk’, we are told. This is a fortunate, thankful, strangeness for us. Young people’s lives, in our normal times, are defined by risk. Now, we are in a new sort of accelerated standstill. We must hurry up and do nothing. Our inertness will buy time for our grandparents, our health service, our nations. We nervously wait for the pages to load. We are holding our breath for what is to come, and we are on hold. Our digital newsfeeds are clogged with a race against time, but we are not running. Ominous doom accompanies everyday boredom. This time will pass, we reassure one another, which is a strange reassurance. With the world less urgently invested in our time, some of us are finding new freedoms. Some are enjoying nostalgia, playing games with our families and spending time with siblings. Screen‐time is no longer monitored with the same sense of ration. What was reclusive is now appropriate. Some of us find this is a time to experiment with alternative selves: new haircuts or hobbies. Though for some, time trapped in parental homes will stunt or scar our growth. We are rethinking what we are to others, as a generation. We are finding new sorts of comparison between our youth and those of our war‐time relations. Our (presumed) technological prowess has become a wireless lifeline for others. Some of us apply ourselves to innovation: hackathons and other forms of technological creativity. Our families look to us to know how to use technology both to waste time and to make meaning. Some of us set up Facetime for those denied face‐to‐face time. We show them it will be OK, that digital relationships are real relationships – though in fact we are not always sure. We liked it when sociality happened in hallways, by coincidence of schedule. We miss accidental, unedited intimacies and unfiltered proximities. Intercorporeal","PeriodicalId":87362,"journal":{"name":"Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1469-8676.12815","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social anthropology : the journal of the European Association of Social Anthropologists = Anthropologie sociale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Our experiences of COVID‐19 have caused us to reflect on youth as an orientation in time. Writing as mostly undergraduates from Cambridge University, before COVID‐19, we lived among expectations that young people’s time should be sociable, memorable, ambitious and self‐discovering. The modern world watches young people for evidence of ‘potential’ in a way that is both exciting and stifling. Young people’s actions are like timepieces: they act as measures for the emergence of new worlds. We might have been forging the future or allowing societal degradation: either way, our actions were timely. Since COVID‐19, our potential futures have been threatened and suspended. ‘Young people are at less risk’, we are told. This is a fortunate, thankful, strangeness for us. Young people’s lives, in our normal times, are defined by risk. Now, we are in a new sort of accelerated standstill. We must hurry up and do nothing. Our inertness will buy time for our grandparents, our health service, our nations. We nervously wait for the pages to load. We are holding our breath for what is to come, and we are on hold. Our digital newsfeeds are clogged with a race against time, but we are not running. Ominous doom accompanies everyday boredom. This time will pass, we reassure one another, which is a strange reassurance. With the world less urgently invested in our time, some of us are finding new freedoms. Some are enjoying nostalgia, playing games with our families and spending time with siblings. Screen‐time is no longer monitored with the same sense of ration. What was reclusive is now appropriate. Some of us find this is a time to experiment with alternative selves: new haircuts or hobbies. Though for some, time trapped in parental homes will stunt or scar our growth. We are rethinking what we are to others, as a generation. We are finding new sorts of comparison between our youth and those of our war‐time relations. Our (presumed) technological prowess has become a wireless lifeline for others. Some of us apply ourselves to innovation: hackathons and other forms of technological creativity. Our families look to us to know how to use technology both to waste time and to make meaning. Some of us set up Facetime for those denied face‐to‐face time. We show them it will be OK, that digital relationships are real relationships – though in fact we are not always sure. We liked it when sociality happened in hallways, by coincidence of schedule. We miss accidental, unedited intimacies and unfiltered proximities. Intercorporeal
病毒时代的青年:在陌生时代迷失方向的年轻人整理的自我民族志反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信