Age determination in children by orthopantomograph and lateral cephalogram: A comparative digital study.

Journal of forensic dental sciences Pub Date : 2019-09-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-03 DOI:10.4103/jfo.jfds_61_19
Anand J Patel, Jigna S Shah
{"title":"Age determination in children by orthopantomograph and lateral cephalogram: A comparative digital study.","authors":"Anand J Patel, Jigna S Shah","doi":"10.4103/jfo.jfds_61_19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The assessment of age is useful in forensic medicine and forensic odontology and in treatment planning in various branch of dentistry. The aim of study is comparative evaluation and assessment of applicability of Demirjian's method, Willem's method of dental age (DA) estimation, and Maria de Paula Caldas's method of skeletal age estimation for children aged 9-16 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 140 individuals (70 females and 70 males) between the age group of 9-16 years were enrolled. These individuals were grouped by a difference of 1 year into 7 groups (each group comprising of 20 individuals: 10 males and 10 females). Dental age estimation was performed from orthopantomograph images of mandibular teeth of left quadrant by both Demirjian's and Willem's methods. Skeletal age estimation was done from Lateral Cephalogram by Caldas Digital Method. The differences between the chronological age and the estimated dental and skeletal ages were statistically tested using paired <i>t</i>-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Demirjian's DA estimation overestimated males (0.4040 years) and females (0.1316 years). Willem's DA estimation method underestimated males (0.1386 years) and females (0.4210 years) and Caldas skeletal age estimation overestimated males (0.2982 years) and females (0.4259 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study concluded Willem's DA estimation method was the most accurate for male and Demirjian's method for female for Gujarati Population. Caldas's new computer-assisted method for skeletal age estimation used in the present study is easy to perform and less time-consuming and objective method and can be applied for Gujarati population.</p>","PeriodicalId":89172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","volume":"11 3","pages":"118-124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4e/5b/JFDS-11-118.PMC7398366.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic dental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_61_19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The assessment of age is useful in forensic medicine and forensic odontology and in treatment planning in various branch of dentistry. The aim of study is comparative evaluation and assessment of applicability of Demirjian's method, Willem's method of dental age (DA) estimation, and Maria de Paula Caldas's method of skeletal age estimation for children aged 9-16 years.

Materials and methods: A total of 140 individuals (70 females and 70 males) between the age group of 9-16 years were enrolled. These individuals were grouped by a difference of 1 year into 7 groups (each group comprising of 20 individuals: 10 males and 10 females). Dental age estimation was performed from orthopantomograph images of mandibular teeth of left quadrant by both Demirjian's and Willem's methods. Skeletal age estimation was done from Lateral Cephalogram by Caldas Digital Method. The differences between the chronological age and the estimated dental and skeletal ages were statistically tested using paired t-test.

Results: Demirjian's DA estimation overestimated males (0.4040 years) and females (0.1316 years). Willem's DA estimation method underestimated males (0.1386 years) and females (0.4210 years) and Caldas skeletal age estimation overestimated males (0.2982 years) and females (0.4259 years).

Conclusion: The study concluded Willem's DA estimation method was the most accurate for male and Demirjian's method for female for Gujarati Population. Caldas's new computer-assisted method for skeletal age estimation used in the present study is easy to perform and less time-consuming and objective method and can be applied for Gujarati population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过正位像片和侧位头颅像片确定儿童年龄:数字对比研究
背景和目的:年龄评估在法医学和法医牙科学以及牙科各学科的治疗计划中非常有用。本研究的目的是对 Demirjian 的方法、Willem 的牙齿年龄(DA)估计方法和 Maria de Paula Caldas 的骨骼年龄估计方法在 9-16 岁儿童中的适用性进行比较评价和评估:共选取了 140 名 9-16 岁年龄组的儿童(70 名女性和 70 名男性)。这些人以 1 岁之差分为 7 组(每组 20 人:10 男 10 女)。牙齿年龄是根据左象限下颌牙齿的正位像片图像,采用 Demirjian 和 Willem 两种方法进行估计的。骨骼年龄是通过卡尔达斯数字法从侧头颅影像中估算出来的。采用配对 t 检验法对年代年龄与估计的牙齿和骨骼年龄之间的差异进行统计检验:结果:Demirjian的DA估计法高估了男性(0.4040岁)和女性(0.1316岁)的年龄。Willem的DA估计法低估了男性(0.1386岁)和女性(0.4210岁),Caldas骨骼年龄估计法高估了男性(0.2982岁)和女性(0.4259岁):研究得出的结论是,在古吉拉特人中,Willem 的年龄估计法对男性最准确,Demirjian 的方法对女性最准确。本研究中使用的 Caldas 计算机辅助骨骼年龄估计新方法操作简便、耗时少且客观,可用于古吉拉特人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书