Pneumonia Hospitalization Coding Changes Associated With Transition From the 9th to 10th Revision of International Classification of Diseases.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2020-07-24 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2333392820939801
Ryan B Smithee, Tiffanie M Markus, Elizabeth Soda, Carlos G Grijalva, Wei Xing, Nong Shang, Marie R Griffin, Fernanda C Lessa
{"title":"Pneumonia Hospitalization Coding Changes Associated With Transition From the 9th to 10th Revision of <i>International Classification of Diseases</i>.","authors":"Ryan B Smithee,&nbsp;Tiffanie M Markus,&nbsp;Elizabeth Soda,&nbsp;Carlos G Grijalva,&nbsp;Wei Xing,&nbsp;Nong Shang,&nbsp;Marie R Griffin,&nbsp;Fernanda C Lessa","doi":"10.1177/2333392820939801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the impact of <i>International Classification of Disease</i>, 10th revision, Clinical Modification (<i>ICD-10-CM</i>) implementation on pneumonia hospitalizations rates, which had declined following pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction for infants in 2000.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We randomly selected records from a single hospital 1 year before (n = 500) and after (n = 500) October 2015 implementation of <i>ICD-10-CM</i> coding. We used a validated <i>ICD-9-CM</i> algorithm and translation of that algorithm to <i>ICD-10-CM</i> to identify pneumonia hospitalizations pre- and post-implementation, respectively. We recoded <i>ICD-10-CM</i> records to <i>ICD-9-CM</i> and vice versa. We calculated sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the <i>ICD-10-CM</i> algorithm using <i>ICD-9-CM</i> coding as the reference. We used sensitivity and PPV values to calculate an adjustment factor to apply to <i>ICD-10</i> era rates to enable comparison with <i>ICD-9-CM</i> rates. We reviewed primary diagnoses of charts not meeting the pneumonia definition when recoded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sensitivity and PPV of the <i>ICD-10-CM</i> algorithm were 94% and 92%, respectively, for young children and 74% and 79% for older adults. The estimated adjustment factor for <i>ICD-10-CM</i> period rates was -2.09% (95% credible region [CR], -7.71% to +3.0%) for children and +6.76% (95% CR, -3.06% to +16.7%) for older adults. We identified a change in coding adult charts that met the <i>ICD-9-CM</i> pneumonia definition that led to recoding in <i>ICD-10-CM</i> as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The <i>ICD-10-CM</i> algorithm derived from a validated <i>ICD-9-CM</i> algorithm should not introduce substantial bias for evaluating pneumonia trends in children. However, changes in coding of pneumonia associated with COPD in adults warrant further study.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"7 ","pages":"2333392820939801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2333392820939801","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2333392820939801","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) implementation on pneumonia hospitalizations rates, which had declined following pneumococcal conjugate vaccine introduction for infants in 2000.

Methods: We randomly selected records from a single hospital 1 year before (n = 500) and after (n = 500) October 2015 implementation of ICD-10-CM coding. We used a validated ICD-9-CM algorithm and translation of that algorithm to ICD-10-CM to identify pneumonia hospitalizations pre- and post-implementation, respectively. We recoded ICD-10-CM records to ICD-9-CM and vice versa. We calculated sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-10-CM algorithm using ICD-9-CM coding as the reference. We used sensitivity and PPV values to calculate an adjustment factor to apply to ICD-10 era rates to enable comparison with ICD-9-CM rates. We reviewed primary diagnoses of charts not meeting the pneumonia definition when recoded.

Results: Sensitivity and PPV of the ICD-10-CM algorithm were 94% and 92%, respectively, for young children and 74% and 79% for older adults. The estimated adjustment factor for ICD-10-CM period rates was -2.09% (95% credible region [CR], -7.71% to +3.0%) for children and +6.76% (95% CR, -3.06% to +16.7%) for older adults. We identified a change in coding adult charts that met the ICD-9-CM pneumonia definition that led to recoding in ICD-10-CM as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation.

Conclusions: The ICD-10-CM algorithm derived from a validated ICD-9-CM algorithm should not introduce substantial bias for evaluating pneumonia trends in children. However, changes in coding of pneumonia associated with COPD in adults warrant further study.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

肺炎住院编码变化与《国际疾病分类》第九版到第十版的过渡相关
目的:评估实施《国际疾病分类第十版临床修改》(ICD-10-CM)对肺炎住院率的影响。2000年婴儿引入肺炎球菌结合疫苗后,肺炎住院率有所下降。方法:随机选取2015年10月实施ICD-10-CM编码前1年(n = 500)和后1年(n = 500)的一家医院的记录。我们使用经过验证的ICD-9-CM算法,并将该算法转换为ICD-10-CM,分别识别实施前和实施后的肺炎住院情况。我们将ICD-10-CM记录编入ICD-9-CM,反之亦然。以ICD-9-CM编码为参考,计算ICD-10-CM算法的灵敏度和阳性预测值(PPV)。我们使用灵敏度和PPV值来计算适用于ICD-10时代速率的调整因子,以便与ICD-9-CM速率进行比较。我们回顾了重新编码时不符合肺炎定义的病历的初步诊断。结果:ICD-10-CM算法对幼儿的敏感性和PPV分别为94%和92%,对老年人的敏感性和PPV分别为74%和79%。儿童ICD-10-CM期率的估计调整因子为-2.09%(95%可信区域[CR], -7.71%至+3.0%),老年人为+6.76%(95%可信区域[CR], -3.06%至+16.7%)。我们确定了符合ICD-9-CM肺炎定义的成人图表编码的变化,导致ICD-10-CM重新编码为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)加重。结论:从经过验证的ICD-9-CM算法衍生的ICD-10-CM算法在评估儿童肺炎趋势时不应引入实质性偏差。然而,成人COPD相关肺炎编码的变化值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信