Addiction Management in Hospitalized Patients With Intravenous Drug Use–Associated Infective Endocarditis

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Vani Ray M.D. , Mindy R. Waite Ph.D. , Frank C. Spexarth R.Ph. , Sandra Korman M.S. , Susan Berget M.S.N., R.N. , Soumya Kodali M.D. , David Kress M.D. , Neil Guenther M.D. , Vishnubhakta S. Murthy M.D.
{"title":"Addiction Management in Hospitalized Patients With Intravenous Drug Use–Associated Infective Endocarditis","authors":"Vani Ray M.D. ,&nbsp;Mindy R. Waite Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Frank C. Spexarth R.Ph. ,&nbsp;Sandra Korman M.S. ,&nbsp;Susan Berget M.S.N., R.N. ,&nbsp;Soumya Kodali M.D. ,&nbsp;David Kress M.D. ,&nbsp;Neil Guenther M.D. ,&nbsp;Vishnubhakta S. Murthy M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.psym.2020.06.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Infections related to intravenous drug use and opioid use disorders (OUDs) are increasing nationwide. Endocarditis is a recognized complication of intravenous drug use, and inpatient treatment typically focuses on infection management without attention to underlying addiction.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>A comprehensive intervention for inpatients with infective endocarditis and intravenous drug use was implemented by a multidisciplinary team at a large midwestern hospital. The team included behavioral health/addiction medicine, infectious disease, pain medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, pharmacy, and nursing to address the OUD while managing the infection. The intervention was assessed by measuring the initiation of medication-assisted treatment and endocarditis-related readmissions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients were identified from the medical records using discharge diagnosis codes for OUDs and infective endocarditis. In addition to medical management of infective endocarditis, the multidisciplinary intervention included early involvement of addiction medicine and the pain management at the time of admission. Patient interventions included education, motivational interviewing, behavioral health engagement, collaborative pain management, individual/family therapy, medication evaluation, and initiation of medication-assisted treatment. Caregivers were also educated on OUDs and ways to support patients undergoing interventions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both the historical control group (<em>N</em> = 37) and the intervention group (<em>N</em> = 33) were comparable in age, gender, race, marital status, psychiatric history, and smoking but differed by employment status, religious affiliation, and use of psychiatric medications. At discharge, 18.9% of the control group and 54.5% in the intervention group were initiated on medication-assisted treatment for OUDs. No differences in readmission rates were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Multidisciplinary teams for treating inpatients with intravenous drug use and infective endocarditis are feasible and can increase the uptake of OUD-specific treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20746,"journal":{"name":"Psychosomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.psym.2020.06.019","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S003331822030205X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Background

Infections related to intravenous drug use and opioid use disorders (OUDs) are increasing nationwide. Endocarditis is a recognized complication of intravenous drug use, and inpatient treatment typically focuses on infection management without attention to underlying addiction.

Objective

A comprehensive intervention for inpatients with infective endocarditis and intravenous drug use was implemented by a multidisciplinary team at a large midwestern hospital. The team included behavioral health/addiction medicine, infectious disease, pain medicine, cardiothoracic surgery, pharmacy, and nursing to address the OUD while managing the infection. The intervention was assessed by measuring the initiation of medication-assisted treatment and endocarditis-related readmissions.

Methods

Patients were identified from the medical records using discharge diagnosis codes for OUDs and infective endocarditis. In addition to medical management of infective endocarditis, the multidisciplinary intervention included early involvement of addiction medicine and the pain management at the time of admission. Patient interventions included education, motivational interviewing, behavioral health engagement, collaborative pain management, individual/family therapy, medication evaluation, and initiation of medication-assisted treatment. Caregivers were also educated on OUDs and ways to support patients undergoing interventions.

Results

Both the historical control group (N = 37) and the intervention group (N = 33) were comparable in age, gender, race, marital status, psychiatric history, and smoking but differed by employment status, religious affiliation, and use of psychiatric medications. At discharge, 18.9% of the control group and 54.5% in the intervention group were initiated on medication-assisted treatment for OUDs. No differences in readmission rates were found.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary teams for treating inpatients with intravenous drug use and infective endocarditis are feasible and can increase the uptake of OUD-specific treatment.

静脉用药相关性感染性心内膜炎住院患者的成瘾管理
背景:与静脉吸毒和阿片类药物使用障碍(OUDs)相关的感染在全国范围内正在增加。心内膜炎是公认的静脉吸毒并发症,住院治疗通常侧重于感染管理,而不关注潜在的成瘾。目的对中西部某大型医院感染性心内膜炎合并静脉用药的住院患者进行综合干预。该团队包括行为健康/成瘾医学、传染病、止痛药、心胸外科、药学和护理,以在控制感染的同时解决OUD问题。通过测量药物辅助治疗的开始和心内膜炎相关的再入院来评估干预措施。方法采用出院诊断码和感染性心内膜炎诊断码对患者进行识别。除了感染性心内膜炎的医疗管理外,多学科干预包括成瘾药物的早期介入和入院时的疼痛管理。患者干预包括教育、动机访谈、行为健康参与、协作疼痛管理、个人/家庭治疗、药物评估和药物辅助治疗的开始。护理人员还接受了关于使用过量药物和如何支持接受干预的患者的教育。结果历史对照组(N = 37)和干预组(N = 33)在年龄、性别、种族、婚姻状况、精神病史和吸烟方面具有可比性,但在就业状况、宗教信仰和精神药物使用方面存在差异。出院时,对照组和干预组分别有18.9%和54.5%的患者开始接受药物辅助治疗。再入院率无差异。结论多学科联合治疗住院静脉用药合并感染性心内膜炎是可行的,可提高体外循环特异性治疗的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychosomatics
Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Psychosomatics is to be the leading psychiatry journal focused on the care of patients with comorbid medical and psychiatric illnesses. The scope of Psychosomatics includes original research, review articles and clinical reports that address psychiatric aspects of medical illnesses and their management. Areas of particular interest include: the effect of co-morbid psychiatric conditions on the management of medical illness; the psychiatric management of patients with comorbid medical illness; educational content for physicians and others specializing in consultation-liaison (C-L) psychiatry; and, the provision of psychiatric services to medical populations, including integrated care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信