Outcomes of patients undergoing radiation therapy for bladder cancer.

Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) Pub Date : 2018-12-31 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.14440/bladder.2018.785
Salman Hasan, Eva Mercedes Galvan, Courtney Shaver, Michael Hermans, Chul Soo Ha, Gregory P Swanson
{"title":"Outcomes of patients undergoing radiation therapy for bladder cancer.","authors":"Salman Hasan,&nbsp;Eva Mercedes Galvan,&nbsp;Courtney Shaver,&nbsp;Michael Hermans,&nbsp;Chul Soo Ha,&nbsp;Gregory P Swanson","doi":"10.14440/bladder.2018.785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To review our two institutional experiences regarding the historical referral patterns of bladder cancer patients to receive radiation therapy, characteristics of these referred patients, and their treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed analyzing patients who underwent radiation therapy for bladder cancer from 2005 to 2015 (<i>n</i> = 69) at two regional referral institutions. The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI) was calculated for each patient. Patients were divided into three groups: definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCR), aggressive radiation (AR) alone ≥ 50 Gy, or palliative radiation alone (PR) < 50 Gy. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) acute toxicities were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median overall AACCI score was 7, which correlates to a two-year expected survival of 55% ± 11%. Thirty-five (50.7%) patients received CCR, 19 (27.5%) received AR, and 15 (21.7%) received PR. Patients presented with hematuria (<i>n</i> = 43, 62%), pain (<i>n</i> = 18, 26%), or obstruction (<i>n</i> = 12, 17%). Of symptomatic patients, treatment improved hematuria in 86%, pain in 75%, and obstruction in 42%. Twenty-two recurrences (32%) were identified at follow-up. Local, regional, and distant recurrences developed in 20%, 14%, and 17% of patients who received CCR. There were two grade 3 GU toxicities and one grade 3 GI toxicity; all grade 3 toxicities were in patients receiving CCR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bladder preservation is possible with chemoradiation therapy; however, urologists rarely refer patients for consideration of chemoradiation. The limited patients who are referred for radiation generally have limited life expectancy, significant comorbidities, or have advanced disease amenable only to palliation. Palliative radiation improves symptoms with minimal toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72421,"journal":{"name":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ee/e7/bladder-5-4-e37.PMC7401990.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14440/bladder.2018.785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To review our two institutional experiences regarding the historical referral patterns of bladder cancer patients to receive radiation therapy, characteristics of these referred patients, and their treatment outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed analyzing patients who underwent radiation therapy for bladder cancer from 2005 to 2015 (n = 69) at two regional referral institutions. The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (AACCI) was calculated for each patient. Patients were divided into three groups: definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCR), aggressive radiation (AR) alone ≥ 50 Gy, or palliative radiation alone (PR) < 50 Gy. Gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) acute toxicities were recorded.

Results: The median overall AACCI score was 7, which correlates to a two-year expected survival of 55% ± 11%. Thirty-five (50.7%) patients received CCR, 19 (27.5%) received AR, and 15 (21.7%) received PR. Patients presented with hematuria (n = 43, 62%), pain (n = 18, 26%), or obstruction (n = 12, 17%). Of symptomatic patients, treatment improved hematuria in 86%, pain in 75%, and obstruction in 42%. Twenty-two recurrences (32%) were identified at follow-up. Local, regional, and distant recurrences developed in 20%, 14%, and 17% of patients who received CCR. There were two grade 3 GU toxicities and one grade 3 GI toxicity; all grade 3 toxicities were in patients receiving CCR.

Conclusions: Bladder preservation is possible with chemoradiation therapy; however, urologists rarely refer patients for consideration of chemoradiation. The limited patients who are referred for radiation generally have limited life expectancy, significant comorbidities, or have advanced disease amenable only to palliation. Palliative radiation improves symptoms with minimal toxicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

膀胱癌患者接受放射治疗的结果。
目的:回顾我们两家机构关于膀胱癌患者接受放射治疗的历史转诊模式,这些转诊患者的特点及其治疗结果的经验。方法:回顾性分析2005年至2015年在两个地区转诊机构接受膀胱癌放射治疗的患者(n = 69)。计算每位患者的年龄校正Charlson合并症指数(AACCI)。患者分为三组:明确同步放化疗(CCR),单独侵袭性放疗(AR)≥50 Gy,或单独姑息性放疗(PR) < 50 Gy。记录胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)急性毒性反应。结果:中位总AACCI评分为7分,两年预期生存率为55%±11%。35例(50.7%)患者接受CCR, 19例(27.5%)患者接受AR, 15例(21.7%)患者接受PR。患者表现为血尿(n = 43, 62%)、疼痛(n = 18, 26%)或梗阻(n = 12, 17%)。在有症状的患者中,治疗改善了86%的血尿、75%的疼痛和42%的梗阻。随访时发现22例复发(32%)。接受CCR的患者中,局部、局部和远处复发分别为20%、14%和17%。GU 3级毒性2例,GI 3级毒性1例;所有3级毒性均发生在接受CCR的患者中。结论:放化疗可保留膀胱;然而,泌尿科医生很少推荐患者考虑放化疗。接受放射治疗的有限患者通常预期寿命有限,有明显的合并症,或疾病晚期只能姑息治疗。姑息性放射治疗以最小的毒性改善症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信