Opioid Use in the Postpartum Period: Are We Prescribing Too Much?

IF 1.1
Danielle Prentice, Amanda Berry, Linzi Stewart, Heather Wilkins, Serdar Ural, Raymond Deiter
{"title":"Opioid Use in the Postpartum Period: Are We Prescribing Too Much?","authors":"Danielle Prentice, Amanda Berry, Linzi Stewart, Heather Wilkins, Serdar Ural, Raymond Deiter","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2020.114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The first exposure to opioids for many women of reproductive age follows childbirth. Current data show a significant correlation between the number of days supplied and continued use/abuse of opioids. The number of women with opioid dependency in pregnancy is steadily increasing, and opioid use is directly linked to an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, there are no clear opioid-prescribing guidelines for the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the number of opioid pills prescribed with the number used by patients in the postpartum period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were recruited to this pilot study at the time of admission to the labor and delivery unit at a community hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; 84 patients gave informed consent to participate. Medical records were reviewed to determine the number of opioids prescribed. Phone surveys were conducted 4 to 6 weeks after discharge to identify the number of opioids used during the postpartum period. Welch t test was used to determine P values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After exclusion criteria were applied, records of 23 patients with vaginal deliveries and 14 patients with cesarean sections were included in the study. Patients who were prescribed opioids after a vaginal delivery were prescribed significantly more pills than were used (P<.001); a mean of 10 opioid pills per patient remained unused. Patients prescribed opioids after cesarean section were also often prescribed more opioid pills than used (P<.05); an average of 7.5 opioid pills per patient remained unused. Of 37 patients, only 2 disposed of unused opioid pills.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The data in this study show a clear example of overprescibing opioids after vaginal and cesarean deliveries leading to increased opioid pill availability within the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":47816,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: The first exposure to opioids for many women of reproductive age follows childbirth. Current data show a significant correlation between the number of days supplied and continued use/abuse of opioids. The number of women with opioid dependency in pregnancy is steadily increasing, and opioid use is directly linked to an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. However, there are no clear opioid-prescribing guidelines for the postpartum period.

Objective: To compare the number of opioid pills prescribed with the number used by patients in the postpartum period.

Methods: Patients were recruited to this pilot study at the time of admission to the labor and delivery unit at a community hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; 84 patients gave informed consent to participate. Medical records were reviewed to determine the number of opioids prescribed. Phone surveys were conducted 4 to 6 weeks after discharge to identify the number of opioids used during the postpartum period. Welch t test was used to determine P values.

Results: After exclusion criteria were applied, records of 23 patients with vaginal deliveries and 14 patients with cesarean sections were included in the study. Patients who were prescribed opioids after a vaginal delivery were prescribed significantly more pills than were used (P<.001); a mean of 10 opioid pills per patient remained unused. Patients prescribed opioids after cesarean section were also often prescribed more opioid pills than used (P<.05); an average of 7.5 opioid pills per patient remained unused. Of 37 patients, only 2 disposed of unused opioid pills.

Conclusion: The data in this study show a clear example of overprescibing opioids after vaginal and cesarean deliveries leading to increased opioid pill availability within the community.

产后阿片类药物的使用:我们是否开得太多了?
背景:许多育龄妇女在分娩后首次接触阿片类药物。目前的数据显示,阿片类药物的供应天数与持续使用/滥用之间存在明显的相关性。妊娠期对阿片类药物产生依赖的妇女人数正在稳步上升,阿片类药物的使用与孕产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率的上升直接相关。然而,目前还没有明确的产后阿片类药物处方指南:比较产后患者的阿片类药物处方数量和使用数量:方法: 在俄克拉荷马州俄克拉荷马市一家社区医院的产科入院时招募患者参与这项试点研究;84 名患者在知情的情况下同意参与研究。研究人员审查了医疗记录,以确定阿片类药物的处方数量。出院后 4 到 6 周进行电话调查,以确定产后期间使用阿片类药物的数量。采用韦尔奇 t 检验确定 P 值:采用排除标准后,23 名阴道分娩患者和 14 名剖宫产患者的记录被纳入研究。阴道分娩后被处方阿片类药物的患者所处方的药片明显多于所使用的药片:本研究的数据清楚地表明,阴道分娩和剖腹产后过度处方阿片类药物导致社区内阿片类药物供应量增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAOA—The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association is the official scientific publication of the American Osteopathic Association, as well as the premier scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of the osteopathic medical profession. The JAOA"s mission is to advance medicine through the scholarly publication of peer-reviewed osteopathic medical research. The JAOA"s goals are: 1. To be the authoritative scholarly publication of the osteopathic medical profession 2. To advance the traditional tenets of osteopathic medicine while encouraging the development of emerging concepts relevant to the profession"s distinctiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信