Functional and oncological outcomes of 3D clampless sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with low nephrometry score.

Q1 Medicine
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-04 DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9
Carlo Introini, Antonia Di Domenico, Marco Ennas, Fabio Campodonico, Claudia Brusasco, Andrea Benelli
{"title":"Functional and oncological outcomes of 3D clampless sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors with low nephrometry score.","authors":"Carlo Introini,&nbsp;Antonia Di Domenico,&nbsp;Marco Ennas,&nbsp;Fabio Campodonico,&nbsp;Claudia Brusasco,&nbsp;Andrea Benelli","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal cell carcinoma still represents 2-3% of all tumors but its mortality is decreased in the last decades due to the early detection of small masses and to the innovative surgical techniques. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of clampless and sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CSLPN) in terms of intra- and postoperative functional results, complication rate and oncological outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated patients undergoing CSLPN between July 2013 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were single, organ confined tumor with size ≤4 cm, intraparenchymal depth ≤1.5 cm, renal nephrometry score between 4 and 6 and no close contact with the collecting system.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 62 patients underwent CSLPN. Mean operative time was 105 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 165 mL. Mean drain time and hospital stay were respectively 2.5 and 4.2 days. Mean 24 hours hemoglobin (Hb) decrease was 2.5 g/dL. No significative variations are described in pre- and postoperative renal function. Twelve patients had postoperative complications. At a median follow-up of 38.5 months all the patients are alive and disease free.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Different techniques have been proposed to reduce warm ischemia time (WIT). In our experience we found many benefits in an off-clamp procedure: it gives an ischemia-related advantage, reduces the overall operating time, eliminates the risks associated with the isolation of hilar vessels. In conclusion CSLPN is a safe and effective procedure for selected renal masses; it does not increase complication rate and offers excellent functional and oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.04005-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Renal cell carcinoma still represents 2-3% of all tumors but its mortality is decreased in the last decades due to the early detection of small masses and to the innovative surgical techniques. The aim of our study was to evaluate safety and feasibility of clampless and sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (CSLPN) in terms of intra- and postoperative functional results, complication rate and oncological outcome.

Methods: We evaluated patients undergoing CSLPN between July 2013 and December 2019. Inclusion criteria were single, organ confined tumor with size ≤4 cm, intraparenchymal depth ≤1.5 cm, renal nephrometry score between 4 and 6 and no close contact with the collecting system.

Results: Overall, 62 patients underwent CSLPN. Mean operative time was 105 minutes, mean intraoperative blood loss was 165 mL. Mean drain time and hospital stay were respectively 2.5 and 4.2 days. Mean 24 hours hemoglobin (Hb) decrease was 2.5 g/dL. No significative variations are described in pre- and postoperative renal function. Twelve patients had postoperative complications. At a median follow-up of 38.5 months all the patients are alive and disease free.

Conclusions: Different techniques have been proposed to reduce warm ischemia time (WIT). In our experience we found many benefits in an off-clamp procedure: it gives an ischemia-related advantage, reduces the overall operating time, eliminates the risks associated with the isolation of hilar vessels. In conclusion CSLPN is a safe and effective procedure for selected renal masses; it does not increase complication rate and offers excellent functional and oncological outcomes.

三维无钳无缝腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗肾测量评分低的肾肿瘤的功能和肿瘤预后。
背景:肾细胞癌仍占所有肿瘤的2-3%,但由于早期发现小肿块和创新的手术技术,其死亡率在过去几十年中有所下降。本研究的目的是评估无夹和无缝线腹腔镜部分肾切除术(CSLPN)在术中和术后功能结果、并发症发生率和肿瘤预后方面的安全性和可行性。方法:我们评估了2013年7月至2019年12月期间接受CSLPN的患者。纳入标准为单一、脏器局限、肿瘤大小≤4cm、肾实质内深度≤1.5 cm、肾肾测量评分在4 ~ 6分之间、与采集系统无密切接触。结果:62例患者接受了CSLPN。平均手术时间105 min,平均术中出血量165 mL,平均引流时间2.5 d,平均住院时间4.2 d。平均24小时血红蛋白(Hb)下降2.5 g/dL。术前和术后肾功能无明显变化。12例患者出现术后并发症。在38.5个月的中位随访中,所有患者都存活且无疾病。结论:提出了不同的技术来缩短热缺血时间。根据我们的经验,我们发现非钳夹手术有很多好处:它具有与缺血相关的优势,减少了总体操作时间,消除了与门脉隔离相关的风险。结论:CSLPN是一种安全有效的手术方法;它不会增加并发症发生率,并提供良好的功能和肿瘤预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信