Management of Bile Duct Injuries: A 6-year Experience in a High Volume Referral Center.

Simay Dal Çavuşoğlu, Mutlu Doğanay, Birkan Birben, Gökhan Akkurt, Özgur Akgul, Mehmet Keşkek
{"title":"Management of Bile Duct Injuries: A 6-year Experience in a High Volume Referral Center.","authors":"Simay Dal Çavuşoğlu,&nbsp;Mutlu Doğanay,&nbsp;Birkan Birben,&nbsp;Gökhan Akkurt,&nbsp;Özgur Akgul,&nbsp;Mehmet Keşkek","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of our study was to determine operative and nonoperative treatments performed in bile duct injuries and the effect of a multidisciplinary approach on the treatment.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Bile duct injuries may lead to morbidities such as biliary leakage, peritonitis, and mortality.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 83 patients with biliary complications (37 patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury referred to our clinic from other centers were also included in this study) were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the operated 6,663 patients, iatrogenic bile duct injury occurred in 46 (0.69%) of these patients. The most common type of injury was Strasberg type A injury, which was found in 48 (57.83%) patients. The time interval between the diagnosis and initiation of treatment after the operation was shorter in patients with an inserted cavity drainage catheter (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Of the patients with bile duct injury, 32.6% received surgical and 62.6% endoscopic treatment, while 4.8% were followed-up without intervention. The rate of mortality was found to be 2.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Time interval to diagnosis is of great importance for management of the patients.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Çavuşoğlu SD, Doğanay M, Birben B, <i>et al.</i> Management of Bile Duct Injuries: A 6-year Experience in a High Volume Referral Center. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2020;10(1):22-26.</p>","PeriodicalId":11992,"journal":{"name":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","volume":"10 1","pages":"22-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ef/aa/ejohg-10-22.PMC7376591.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euroasian Journal of Hepato-Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10018-1309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine operative and nonoperative treatments performed in bile duct injuries and the effect of a multidisciplinary approach on the treatment.

Background: Bile duct injuries may lead to morbidities such as biliary leakage, peritonitis, and mortality.

Materials and methods: A total of 83 patients with biliary complications (37 patients with iatrogenic bile duct injury referred to our clinic from other centers were also included in this study) were evaluated.

Results: Of the operated 6,663 patients, iatrogenic bile duct injury occurred in 46 (0.69%) of these patients. The most common type of injury was Strasberg type A injury, which was found in 48 (57.83%) patients. The time interval between the diagnosis and initiation of treatment after the operation was shorter in patients with an inserted cavity drainage catheter (p < 0.05). Of the patients with bile duct injury, 32.6% received surgical and 62.6% endoscopic treatment, while 4.8% were followed-up without intervention. The rate of mortality was found to be 2.4%.

Conclusion: Time interval to diagnosis is of great importance for management of the patients.

How to cite this article: Çavuşoğlu SD, Doğanay M, Birben B, et al. Management of Bile Duct Injuries: A 6-year Experience in a High Volume Referral Center. Euroasian J Hepato-Gastroenterol 2020;10(1):22-26.

胆管损伤的管理:高容量转诊中心的6年经验。
目的:我们研究的目的是确定胆管损伤的手术和非手术治疗方法以及多学科方法对治疗的影响。背景:胆管损伤可导致胆漏、腹膜炎和死亡等并发症。材料与方法:对83例胆道并发症患者进行评估,其中37例其他中心转至我院就诊的医源性胆管损伤患者也纳入本研究。结果:6663例手术患者中,医源性胆管损伤46例(0.69%)。最常见的损伤类型为Strasberg A型损伤,48例(57.83%)。置入腔内引流管的患者术后诊断至开始治疗的时间间隔较短(p < 0.05)。胆管损伤患者中,手术治疗占32.6%,内镜治疗占62.6%,无干预随访占4.8%。死亡率为2.4%。结论:诊断间隔时间对患者的治疗具有重要意义。文章引用方式:Çavuşoğlu SD, Doğanay M, Birben B, et al。胆管损伤的管理:高容量转诊中心的6年经验。中华肝病与胃肠病杂志;2020;10(1):22-26。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信