Posterior shoulder tightness; an intersession reliability study of 3 clinical tests.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2020-07-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40945-020-00084-w
Kevin Hall, Jeremy Lewis, Ann Moore, Colette Ridehalgh
{"title":"Posterior shoulder tightness; an intersession reliability study of 3 clinical tests.","authors":"Kevin Hall,&nbsp;Jeremy Lewis,&nbsp;Ann Moore,&nbsp;Colette Ridehalgh","doi":"10.1186/s40945-020-00084-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although posterior shoulder tightness (PST) has been associated with shoulder pathology and altered glenohumeral joint kinematics, uncertainty remains regarding its cause and definition. To understand the efficacy of treatments for PST, it must be possible to identify people with PST for the purposes of research and clinical decision-making. Clinical tests for PST must demonstrate acceptable levels of measurement reliability in order to identify the condition and to evaluate the response to intervention. There is currently a lack of research describing intersession reliability for measures of PST. The aim of this study was to quantify the inter-session reliability for three clinical tests used to identify PST over a 6-10 week interval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of 26 asymptomatic adult participants (52 shoulders) were recruited from a university setting over a five-month duration. Participants attended the human movement laboratory for measurement of glenohumeral joint internal rotation, horizontal adduction and low flexion on two occasions separated by an interval of 6-10 weeks.Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated from the mean square values derived from the within-subject, single factor (repeated measures) ANOVA. Test-retest measurement stability was evaluated by calculating the standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change for each measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 tests demonstrated good intersession intra-rater reliability (0.86-0.88), and the standard error of measurement (95%) were 7.3° for glenohumeral horizontal adduction, 9.4° for internal rotation, and 6.9° for low flexion. The minimum detectable change for glenohumeral horizontal adduction was 10.2°, internal rotation was 13.3°, and low flexion was 9.7°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this population of people without symptoms, the 3 measures of PST all demonstrated acceptable inter-session reliability. The standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change results can be used to determine if a change in measures of PST are due to measurement error or an actual change over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40945-020-00084-w","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00084-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Although posterior shoulder tightness (PST) has been associated with shoulder pathology and altered glenohumeral joint kinematics, uncertainty remains regarding its cause and definition. To understand the efficacy of treatments for PST, it must be possible to identify people with PST for the purposes of research and clinical decision-making. Clinical tests for PST must demonstrate acceptable levels of measurement reliability in order to identify the condition and to evaluate the response to intervention. There is currently a lack of research describing intersession reliability for measures of PST. The aim of this study was to quantify the inter-session reliability for three clinical tests used to identify PST over a 6-10 week interval.

Methods: A convenience sample of 26 asymptomatic adult participants (52 shoulders) were recruited from a university setting over a five-month duration. Participants attended the human movement laboratory for measurement of glenohumeral joint internal rotation, horizontal adduction and low flexion on two occasions separated by an interval of 6-10 weeks.Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated from the mean square values derived from the within-subject, single factor (repeated measures) ANOVA. Test-retest measurement stability was evaluated by calculating the standard error of measurement and the minimum detectable change for each measurement.

Results: All 3 tests demonstrated good intersession intra-rater reliability (0.86-0.88), and the standard error of measurement (95%) were 7.3° for glenohumeral horizontal adduction, 9.4° for internal rotation, and 6.9° for low flexion. The minimum detectable change for glenohumeral horizontal adduction was 10.2°, internal rotation was 13.3°, and low flexion was 9.7°.

Conclusion: In this population of people without symptoms, the 3 measures of PST all demonstrated acceptable inter-session reliability. The standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change results can be used to determine if a change in measures of PST are due to measurement error or an actual change over time.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

后肩紧绷;3项临床试验的间歇信度研究。
背景:尽管后肩紧绷(PST)与肩部病理和肩关节运动改变有关,但其原因和定义仍不确定。为了了解PST治疗的疗效,必须能够识别出PST患者,以便进行研究和临床决策。PST的临床试验必须显示出可接受的测量可靠性水平,以便确定病情并评估对干预措施的反应。目前缺乏描述PST测量的间歇可靠性的研究。本研究的目的是量化在6-10周间隔内用于识别PST的三种临床试验的会话间信度。方法:从一所大学招募26名无症状成人参与者(52肩),为期5个月。参与者参加人体运动实验室,测量肩关节内旋、水平内收和低屈曲两次,间隔6-10周。类别内相关系数由受试者内单因素(重复测量)方差分析得出的均方值计算。通过计算测量的标准误差和每次测量的最小可检测变化来评估测试-重测试测量的稳定性。结果:所有3项试验均显示出良好的术间可靠性(0.86-0.88),测量的标准误差(95%)为肱盂水平内收7.3°,内旋9.4°,低屈曲6.9°。肩关节水平内收的最小变化为10.2°,内旋为13.3°,低屈曲为9.7°。结论:在无症状人群中,PST的3项测量均显示出可接受的会话间信度。测量的标准误差和最小可检测变化结果可用于确定PST测量的变化是由于测量误差还是由于随时间的实际变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信