Management of erectile dysfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.

Q1 Medicine
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-08-04 DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03780-7
Michele Marchioni, Piergustavo De Francesco, Roberto Castellucci, Rocco Papalia, Selçuk Sarikaya, Juan Gomez Rivas, Luigi Schips, Roberto M Scarpa, Francesco Esperto
{"title":"Management of erectile dysfunction following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review.","authors":"Michele Marchioni,&nbsp;Piergustavo De Francesco,&nbsp;Roberto Castellucci,&nbsp;Rocco Papalia,&nbsp;Selçuk Sarikaya,&nbsp;Juan Gomez Rivas,&nbsp;Luigi Schips,&nbsp;Roberto M Scarpa,&nbsp;Francesco Esperto","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03780-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to summarize evidences about the efficacy of available treatments for erectile disfunction after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic literature review searching on PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed in December 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Population consisted of patients with erectile disfunction after RARP (P), conservative and surgical intervention were considered of interest (I). No comparator was considered mandatory (C). Outcomes of interest were the recovery of erectile function after conservative treatments and sexual function after surgical treatments (O).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Eleven studies were included. Seven studies focused on the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) alone (five studies) or associated with other treatments (two studies). All the studies confirmed the efficacy of PDE5i, while the most promising association is with vacuum pump erectile devices. Two studies investigated topical treatments, namely low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy and alprostadil. Low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be a promising option in patients in whom nerve-sparing surgery was performed. The use of alprostadil could be an effective alternative to intracorporeal injection in those who underwent non-nerve-sparing surgery. One study focused and confirmed the efficacy of penile implants. Furthermore, one study reported the efficacy of a multi-modal treatment with preoperative medication, showing the benefits of a multimodal approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Penile rehabilitation with PDE5i is effective after nerve sparing RARP. The association of PDE5i with vacuum devices could led to a faster recovery. A multimodal approach with preoperative specific care seems to be effective to fasten erectile function recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":" ","pages":"543-554"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03780-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to summarize evidences about the efficacy of available treatments for erectile disfunction after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).

Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature review searching on PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and Web of Science databases was performed in December 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Population consisted of patients with erectile disfunction after RARP (P), conservative and surgical intervention were considered of interest (I). No comparator was considered mandatory (C). Outcomes of interest were the recovery of erectile function after conservative treatments and sexual function after surgical treatments (O).

Evidence synthesis: Eleven studies were included. Seven studies focused on the use of phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5i) alone (five studies) or associated with other treatments (two studies). All the studies confirmed the efficacy of PDE5i, while the most promising association is with vacuum pump erectile devices. Two studies investigated topical treatments, namely low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy and alprostadil. Low intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy may be a promising option in patients in whom nerve-sparing surgery was performed. The use of alprostadil could be an effective alternative to intracorporeal injection in those who underwent non-nerve-sparing surgery. One study focused and confirmed the efficacy of penile implants. Furthermore, one study reported the efficacy of a multi-modal treatment with preoperative medication, showing the benefits of a multimodal approach.

Conclusions: Penile rehabilitation with PDE5i is effective after nerve sparing RARP. The association of PDE5i with vacuum devices could led to a faster recovery. A multimodal approach with preoperative specific care seems to be effective to fasten erectile function recovery.

机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后勃起功能障碍的管理:一项系统综述。
简介:我们旨在总结机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)后勃起功能障碍的现有治疗方法的有效性证据。证据获取:2019年12月,对PubMed (Medline)、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行了系统的文献综述检索。遵循PRISMA准则。人群由RARP后勃起功能障碍的患者组成(P),保守和手术干预被认为是有意义的(I)。没有比较者被认为是强制性的(C)。感兴趣的结果是保守治疗后勃起功能的恢复和手术治疗后性功能的恢复(O)。证据综合:包括11项研究。7项研究集中于单独使用磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂(PDE5i)(5项研究)或与其他治疗联合使用(2项研究)。所有的研究都证实了PDE5i的有效性,而最有希望的关联是真空泵勃起装置。两项研究调查了局部治疗,即低强度体外冲击波治疗和前列地尔。低强度体外冲击波治疗可能是一个很有前途的选择,病人的神经保留手术进行。前列地尔的应用可以作为非保神经手术患者体内注射的有效替代方法。一项研究关注并证实了阴茎植入物的功效。此外,一项研究报告了术前用药多模式治疗的疗效,显示了多模式治疗的益处。结论:保神经RARP术后应用PDE5i进行阴茎康复是有效的。PDE5i与真空装置的关联可能导致更快的恢复。术前特殊护理的多模式方法似乎可以有效地加快勃起功能的恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信