Teleophthalmology through handheld mobile devices: a pilot study in rural Nepal.

Karen Hong, Sean Collon, David Chang, Sunil Thakalli, John Welling, Matthew Oliva, Esteban Peralta, Reeta Gurung, Sanduk Ruit, Geoffrey Tabin, David Myung, Suman Thapa
{"title":"Teleophthalmology through handheld mobile devices: a pilot study in rural Nepal.","authors":"Karen Hong,&nbsp;Sean Collon,&nbsp;David Chang,&nbsp;Sunil Thakalli,&nbsp;John Welling,&nbsp;Matthew Oliva,&nbsp;Esteban Peralta,&nbsp;Reeta Gurung,&nbsp;Sanduk Ruit,&nbsp;Geoffrey Tabin,&nbsp;David Myung,&nbsp;Suman Thapa","doi":"10.7309/jmtm.8.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To compare screening referral recommendations made by remotely located ophthalmic technicians with those of an ophthalmologist examining digital photos obtained by a portable ophthalmic camera system powered by an iOS handheld mobile device (iPod Touch).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Dilated screening eye exams were performed by ophthalmic technicians in four remote districts of Nepal. Anterior and posterior segment photographs captured with a Paxos Scope ophthalmic camera system attached to an iPod Touch 6<sup>th</sup> generation device were uploaded to a secure cloud database for review by an ophthalmologist in Kathmandu. The ophthalmic technicians' referral decisions based on slit-lamp exam were compared to the ophthalmologist's recommendation based on the transmitted images.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the transmitted images, the ophthalmologist recommended referral for an additional 20% of the 346 total subjects screened who would not have been referred by the ophthalmic technician. Of those subjects, 34% were referred to the retina clinic. Conversely, among the 101 patients referred by the technician, the ophthalmologist concurred with the appropriateness of referral in more than 97% of cases but thought eight (2.8%) of those patients had variants of normal eye pathology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An ophthalmologist who reviewed data and photos gathered with the mobile device teleophthalmology system identified a significant number of patients whose need for referral was not identified by the screening technician. Posterior segment pathology was most frequently found by the remote reader and not by the technician performing dilated slit lamp examinations. These results are promising for further clinical implementation of handheld mobile devices as tools for teleophthalmic screening in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":87305,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7388679/pdf/nihms-1609966.pdf","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mobile technology in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7309/jmtm.8.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background: To compare screening referral recommendations made by remotely located ophthalmic technicians with those of an ophthalmologist examining digital photos obtained by a portable ophthalmic camera system powered by an iOS handheld mobile device (iPod Touch).

Methods: Dilated screening eye exams were performed by ophthalmic technicians in four remote districts of Nepal. Anterior and posterior segment photographs captured with a Paxos Scope ophthalmic camera system attached to an iPod Touch 6th generation device were uploaded to a secure cloud database for review by an ophthalmologist in Kathmandu. The ophthalmic technicians' referral decisions based on slit-lamp exam were compared to the ophthalmologist's recommendation based on the transmitted images.

Results: Using the transmitted images, the ophthalmologist recommended referral for an additional 20% of the 346 total subjects screened who would not have been referred by the ophthalmic technician. Of those subjects, 34% were referred to the retina clinic. Conversely, among the 101 patients referred by the technician, the ophthalmologist concurred with the appropriateness of referral in more than 97% of cases but thought eight (2.8%) of those patients had variants of normal eye pathology.

Conclusion: An ophthalmologist who reviewed data and photos gathered with the mobile device teleophthalmology system identified a significant number of patients whose need for referral was not identified by the screening technician. Posterior segment pathology was most frequently found by the remote reader and not by the technician performing dilated slit lamp examinations. These results are promising for further clinical implementation of handheld mobile devices as tools for teleophthalmic screening in resource-limited settings.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过手持移动设备进行远程眼科:在尼泊尔农村进行的一项试点研究。
背景:比较远程眼科技术人员提出的筛查推荐与眼科医生检查由iOS手持移动设备(iPod Touch)驱动的便携式眼科相机系统获得的数字照片的推荐。方法:由尼泊尔四个偏远地区的眼科技术人员进行扩张性筛检。与iPod Touch第6代设备相连的Paxos Scope眼科相机系统拍摄的前后段照片被上传到安全的云数据库,供加德满都的眼科医生审查。将眼科技术人员基于裂隙灯检查的转诊决定与眼科医生基于传输图像的推荐进行比较。结果:使用传输的图像,眼科医生推荐了346名筛查对象中另外20%的人转诊,这些人本来不会被眼科技术人员转诊。在这些受试者中,34%的人被转介到视网膜诊所。相反,在技术人员转诊的101名患者中,眼科医生同意97%以上的病例转诊的适当性,但认为其中8名(2.8%)患者有正常的眼部病理变异。结论:一位眼科医生在审查了移动设备远程眼科系统收集的数据和照片后,发现了大量筛查技术人员没有发现需要转诊的患者。后段病理最常被远程阅读器发现,而不是由技术人员进行扩张型裂隙灯检查。这些结果有望在资源有限的情况下进一步临床实施手持移动设备作为远视筛查工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信