Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Jordi Moreno, Keegan Knittle, Johanna Nurmi, Todor Ginchev, Gemma Parramón, Andreea Ciudin, Jose Antonio Ramos-Quiroga, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios
{"title":"Assessing the user experience and usability of the PRECIOUS system: a randomized controlled trial in obese patients.","authors":"Carmina Castellano-Tejedor, Jordi Moreno, Keegan Knittle, Johanna Nurmi, Todor Ginchev, Gemma Parramón, Andreea Ciudin, Jose Antonio Ramos-Quiroga, Pilar Lusilla-Palacios","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2020.1776292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To assess users' usability, satisfaction, acceptance and effectiveness of the PRECIOUS system to promote behavior change toward healthier lifestyles. <b>Design</b>: Thirty-one adult patients with BMI>30 (M = 44.23, SD = 5.91) were recruited and randomized into three conditions for a longitudinal study (3 months length): 1) Control group (TAU + biofeedback + follow-ups); 2) PRECIOUS only (app + biofeedback + follow-ups); 3) PRECIOUS + MI (app + biofeedback + motivational interviewing follow-ups). <b>Main Outcome Measures</b>: Usability, satisfaction, acceptance and effectiveness of PRECIOUS, and stages of change (S-Weight questionnaire). <b>Results</b>: The system was described as easy to use, flexible, fairly satisfying and good as a preventive health system. Participants rated biofeedback and the Physical Activity module as the most satisfying features. However, participants were unsatisfied with the Diet module. All additional features received acceptable scores in terms of satisfaction. Despite this, the PRECIOUS only group reported that they would probably recommend the system to others because it meets its purposes quite well. <b>Conclusion</b>: PRECIOUS was found a usable and acceptable solution, although improving several features in the Diet module in successive versions of the app would promote sustained use and satisfaction among users, possibly increasing its effectiveness in promoting healthier lifestyles. Abbreviations: ADA American Diabetes Association; <b>BG2</b>: BodyGuard2; <b>BMI</b>: Body Mass Index; <b>CBT</b>: Cognitive-behavioral therapy; <b>EMA</b>: Ecological Momentary Assessment; <b>eHealth</b>: Electronic health; <b>mHealth</b>: Mobile health; <b>MI</b>: Motivational interviewing; <b>NCD</b>: Non-communicable diseases; <b>PA</b>: Physical activity; <b>PRECIOUS</b>: PREventive Care Infrastructure based On Ubiquitous Sensing.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":"45 4","pages":"410-427"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17538157.2020.1776292","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2020.1776292","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Objective To assess users' usability, satisfaction, acceptance and effectiveness of the PRECIOUS system to promote behavior change toward healthier lifestyles. Design: Thirty-one adult patients with BMI>30 (M = 44.23, SD = 5.91) were recruited and randomized into three conditions for a longitudinal study (3 months length): 1) Control group (TAU + biofeedback + follow-ups); 2) PRECIOUS only (app + biofeedback + follow-ups); 3) PRECIOUS + MI (app + biofeedback + motivational interviewing follow-ups). Main Outcome Measures: Usability, satisfaction, acceptance and effectiveness of PRECIOUS, and stages of change (S-Weight questionnaire). Results: The system was described as easy to use, flexible, fairly satisfying and good as a preventive health system. Participants rated biofeedback and the Physical Activity module as the most satisfying features. However, participants were unsatisfied with the Diet module. All additional features received acceptable scores in terms of satisfaction. Despite this, the PRECIOUS only group reported that they would probably recommend the system to others because it meets its purposes quite well. Conclusion: PRECIOUS was found a usable and acceptable solution, although improving several features in the Diet module in successive versions of the app would promote sustained use and satisfaction among users, possibly increasing its effectiveness in promoting healthier lifestyles. Abbreviations: ADA American Diabetes Association; BG2: BodyGuard2; BMI: Body Mass Index; CBT: Cognitive-behavioral therapy; EMA: Ecological Momentary Assessment; eHealth: Electronic health; mHealth: Mobile health; MI: Motivational interviewing; NCD: Non-communicable diseases; PA: Physical activity; PRECIOUS: PREventive Care Infrastructure based On Ubiquitous Sensing.
期刊介绍:
Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus.
The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems.
Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects.
Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome.
Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.