MUST-Plus: A Machine Learning Classifier That Improves Malnutrition Screening in Acute Care Facilities.

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Prem Timsina, Himanshu N Joshi, Fu-Yuan Cheng, Ilana Kersch, Sara Wilson, Claudia Colgan, Robert Freeman, David L Reich, Jeffrey Mechanick, Madhu Mazumdar, Matthew A Levin, Arash Kia
{"title":"MUST-Plus: A Machine Learning Classifier That Improves Malnutrition Screening in Acute Care Facilities.","authors":"Prem Timsina,&nbsp;Himanshu N Joshi,&nbsp;Fu-Yuan Cheng,&nbsp;Ilana Kersch,&nbsp;Sara Wilson,&nbsp;Claudia Colgan,&nbsp;Robert Freeman,&nbsp;David L Reich,&nbsp;Jeffrey Mechanick,&nbsp;Madhu Mazumdar,&nbsp;Matthew A Levin,&nbsp;Arash Kia","doi":"10.1080/07315724.2020.1774821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Malnutrition among hospital patients, a frequent, yet under-diagnosed problem is associated with adverse impact on patient outcome and health care costs. Development of highly accurate malnutrition screening tools is, therefore, essential for its timely detection, for providing nutritional care, and for addressing the concerns related to the suboptimal predictive value of the conventional screening tools, such as the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) based classifier (MUST-Plus) for more accurate prediction of malnutrition.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A retrospective cohort with inpatient data consisting of anthropometric, lab biochemistry, clinical data, and demographics from adult (≥ 18 years) admissions at a large tertiary health care system between January 2017 and July 2018 was used. The registered dietitian (RD) nutritional assessments were used as the gold standard outcome label. The cohort was randomly split (70:30) into training and test sets. A random forest model was trained using 10-fold cross-validation on training set, and its predictive performance on test set was compared to MUST.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 13.3% of admissions were associated with malnutrition in the test cohort. MUST-Plus provided 73.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.61%-76.33%) sensitivity, 76.89% (95% CI: 75.64%-78.11%) specificity, and 83.5% (95% CI: 82.0%-85.0%) area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Compared to classic MUST, MUST-Plus demonstrated 30% higher sensitivity, 6% higher specificity, and 17% increased AUC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ML-based MUST-Plus provided superior performance in identifying malnutrition compared to the classic MUST. The tool can be used for improving the operational efficiency of RDs by timely referrals of high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","volume":"40 1","pages":"3-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07315724.2020.1774821","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2020.1774821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Objective: Malnutrition among hospital patients, a frequent, yet under-diagnosed problem is associated with adverse impact on patient outcome and health care costs. Development of highly accurate malnutrition screening tools is, therefore, essential for its timely detection, for providing nutritional care, and for addressing the concerns related to the suboptimal predictive value of the conventional screening tools, such as the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST). We aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) based classifier (MUST-Plus) for more accurate prediction of malnutrition.

Method: A retrospective cohort with inpatient data consisting of anthropometric, lab biochemistry, clinical data, and demographics from adult (≥ 18 years) admissions at a large tertiary health care system between January 2017 and July 2018 was used. The registered dietitian (RD) nutritional assessments were used as the gold standard outcome label. The cohort was randomly split (70:30) into training and test sets. A random forest model was trained using 10-fold cross-validation on training set, and its predictive performance on test set was compared to MUST.

Results: In all, 13.3% of admissions were associated with malnutrition in the test cohort. MUST-Plus provided 73.07% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 69.61%-76.33%) sensitivity, 76.89% (95% CI: 75.64%-78.11%) specificity, and 83.5% (95% CI: 82.0%-85.0%) area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Compared to classic MUST, MUST-Plus demonstrated 30% higher sensitivity, 6% higher specificity, and 17% increased AUC.

Conclusions: ML-based MUST-Plus provided superior performance in identifying malnutrition compared to the classic MUST. The tool can be used for improving the operational efficiency of RDs by timely referrals of high-risk patients.

必备:机器学习分类器,改善急性护理设施的营养不良筛查。
目的:医院患者营养不良是一个常见但诊断不足的问题,对患者预后和医疗保健费用产生不利影响。因此,开发高度准确的营养不良筛查工具对于及时发现营养不良、提供营养护理以及解决与常规筛查工具(如营养不良普遍筛查工具(MUST))的次优预测值相关的问题至关重要。我们的目标是开发一种基于机器学习(ML)的分类器(MUST-Plus),以更准确地预测营养不良。方法:采用回顾性队列,包括2017年1月至2018年7月在大型三级医疗保健系统中入院的成人(≥18岁)的人体测量学、实验室生化、临床数据和人口统计学数据。注册营养师(RD)营养评估被用作金标准结果标签。队列随机分为训练组和测试组(70:30)。对随机森林模型在训练集上进行10倍交叉验证,并将其在测试集上的预测性能与MUST进行比较。结果:在测试队列中,总共有13.3%的入院患者与营养不良有关。MUST-Plus的灵敏度为73.07%(95%可信区间[CI]: 69.61% ~ 76.33%),特异性为76.89% (95% CI: 75.64% ~ 78.11%),受试者工作曲线下面积为83.5% (95% CI: 82.0% ~ 85.0%)。与经典MUST相比,MUST- plus的敏感性提高30%,特异性提高6%,AUC增加17%。结论:与经典的MUST相比,基于ml的MUST- plus在识别营养不良方面提供了更好的性能。该工具可用于通过及时转诊高危患者来提高rd的操作效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Nutrition accepts the following types of submissions: Original and innovative research in nutrition science with useful application for researchers, physicians, nutritionists, and other healthcare professionals with emphasis on discoveries which help to individualize or "personalize" nutrition science; Critical reviews on pertinent nutrition topics that highlight key teaching points and relevance to nutrition; Letters to the editors and commentaries on important issues in the field of nutrition; Abstract clusters on nutritional topics with editorial comments; Book reviews; Abstracts from the annual meeting of the American College of Nutrition in the October issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信