Cognitive Process Differences Between Moral Beauty Judgments and Moral Goodness Judgments.

IF 1 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Advances in Cognitive Psychology Pub Date : 2020-05-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.5709/acp-0293-9
Yanhui Xiang, Xue Wen, Jiaxu Zhao, Wenrui Zhang, Yiqi Jiang
{"title":"Cognitive Process Differences Between Moral Beauty Judgments and Moral Goodness Judgments.","authors":"Yanhui Xiang,&nbsp;Xue Wen,&nbsp;Jiaxu Zhao,&nbsp;Wenrui Zhang,&nbsp;Yiqi Jiang","doi":"10.5709/acp-0293-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Goodness and beauty have always been important topics of debate in the field of philosophy and aesthetics. The present study used behavior and event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments involve different cognitive processes or the same cognitive process under different language labels for the same human act. Behavioral results showed that individuals gave significantly higher scores for a beautiful face than an ugly face when making moral beauty judgments, but there were no significant differences between the two conditions when making moral goodness judgments. The ERP experiment displayed larger P2 amplitudes and the late positive potential (LPP) amplitude was elicited when displaying beautiful faces but not ugly faces during moral beauty judgments. However, during moral goodness judgments, the P2 and LPP showed no significant differences under the two conditions. In general, we conclude that moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments involve different cognitive processes, although they objectively refer to the same human act. One of the most important differences between moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments was that the former process involved an image, whereas the latter did not. The present conclusion provides important insights into the research in aesthetic perception and moral sense.</p>","PeriodicalId":51754,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","volume":"16 2","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f6/3c/acp-16-2-296.PMC7358606.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0293-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goodness and beauty have always been important topics of debate in the field of philosophy and aesthetics. The present study used behavior and event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate whether moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments involve different cognitive processes or the same cognitive process under different language labels for the same human act. Behavioral results showed that individuals gave significantly higher scores for a beautiful face than an ugly face when making moral beauty judgments, but there were no significant differences between the two conditions when making moral goodness judgments. The ERP experiment displayed larger P2 amplitudes and the late positive potential (LPP) amplitude was elicited when displaying beautiful faces but not ugly faces during moral beauty judgments. However, during moral goodness judgments, the P2 and LPP showed no significant differences under the two conditions. In general, we conclude that moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments involve different cognitive processes, although they objectively refer to the same human act. One of the most important differences between moral beauty judgments and moral goodness judgments was that the former process involved an image, whereas the latter did not. The present conclusion provides important insights into the research in aesthetic perception and moral sense.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

道德美判断与道德善判断的认知过程差异。
善与美一直是哲学和美学领域争论的重要话题。本研究利用行为和事件相关电位(ERPs)研究道德美判断和道德善判断是否涉及不同的认知过程,或者在不同的语言标签下对同一人类行为是否涉及相同的认知过程。行为结果表明,在道德美判断中,个体对漂亮面孔的得分明显高于对丑陋面孔的得分,但在道德善判断中,两种情况下的得分无显著差异。ERP实验显示,在道德美的判断过程中,当呈现漂亮的面孔时,会诱发较大的P2波幅,而呈现丑陋的面孔时,则不会诱发后期正电位波幅。而在道德善良判断中,两种情况下P2和LPP均无显著差异。总的来说,我们得出结论,道德美判断和道德善判断涉及不同的认知过程,尽管它们客观上指的是同一种人类行为。道德美判断和道德善判断之间最重要的区别之一是,前者的过程涉及图像,而后者则没有。这一结论对审美知觉和道德感的研究具有重要的启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Cognitive Psychology
Advances in Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信