Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study.

Q2 Medicine
Sarcoma Pub Date : 2020-06-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/2040347
Louren M Goedhart, Andreas Leithner, Joris J W Ploegmakers, Paul C Jutte
{"title":"Follow-Up in Bone Sarcoma Care: A Cross-Sectional European Study.","authors":"Louren M Goedhart,&nbsp;Andreas Leithner,&nbsp;Joris J W Ploegmakers,&nbsp;Paul C Jutte","doi":"10.1155/2020/2040347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21431,"journal":{"name":"Sarcoma","volume":"2020 ","pages":"2040347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/2040347","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sarcoma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/2040347","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Follow-up of high-grade bone sarcoma patients with repeated radiological imaging aims at early detection of recurrent disease or distant metastasis. Repeated radiological imaging does expose (mostly young) patients to ionising radiation. At this point, it is not known whether frequent follow-up increases overall survival. Additionally, frequent follow-up subjects patients and families to psychological stress. This study aims to assess follow-up procedures in terms of frequency and type of imaging modalities in bone tumour centres across Europe for comparison and improvement of knowledge as a first step towards a more uniform approach towards bone sarcoma follow-up.

Methods: Data were obtained through analysis of several follow-up protocols and a digital questionnaire returned by EMSOS members of bone tumour centres all across Europe.

Results: All participating bone tumour centres attained a minimum follow-up period of ten years. National guidelines revealed variations in follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging with ionising radiation. A local and a chest X-ray were obtained at 47.6% of the responding clinics at every follow-up patient visit.

Conclusions: Variations were seen among European bone sarcoma centres with regards to follow-up intervals and use of repeated imaging. The majority of these expert centres follow existing international guidelines and find them sufficient as basis for a follow-up surveillance programme despite lack of evidence. Future research should aim towards evidence-based follow-up with focus on the effects of follow-up strategies on health outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and individualised follow-up algorithms.

Abstract Image

骨肉瘤治疗的随访:一项横断面欧洲研究。
背景:对高级别骨肉瘤患者进行反复影像学随访,目的是早期发现复发或远处转移。反复的放射成像确实使病人(主要是年轻人)暴露在电离辐射下。在这一点上,不知道频繁的随访是否会增加总生存率。此外,频繁随访患者及家属的心理压力。本研究旨在评估欧洲骨肿瘤中心在频率和成像方式类型方面的随访程序,以比较和改进知识,作为迈向更统一的骨肉瘤随访方法的第一步。方法:通过分析几个随访方案和欧洲各地骨肿瘤中心EMSOS成员返回的数字问卷获得数据。结果:所有参与的骨肿瘤中心都达到了最低10年的随访期。国家指南揭示了随访间隔的变化和电离辐射重复成像的使用。47.6%的回应诊所在每次随访患者就诊时获得局部x光和胸部x光。结论:欧洲骨肉瘤中心在随访间隔和重复成像方面存在差异。这些专家中心大多数遵循现有的国际准则,并认为尽管缺乏证据,但这些准则足以作为后续监测方案的基础。未来的研究应着眼于循证随访,重点关注随访策略对健康结果、成本效益和个性化随访算法的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sarcoma
Sarcoma Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Sarcoma is dedicated to publishing papers covering all aspects of connective tissue oncology research. It brings together work from scientists and clinicians carrying out a broad range of research in this field, including the basic sciences, molecular biology and pathology and the clinical sciences of epidemiology, surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. High-quality papers concerning the entire range of bone and soft tissue sarcomas in both adults and children, including Kaposi"s sarcoma, are published as well as preclinical and animal studies. This journal provides a central forum for the description of advances in diagnosis, assessment and treatment of this rarely seen, but often mismanaged, group of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信