Learning curve for gynecological oncologists in performing upper abdominal surgery.

IF 1 Q2 Medicine
Minerva ginecologica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-17 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04605-5
Mariaclelia La Russa, Chrysoula G Liakou, Nikolaos Akrivos, Hilary L Turnbull, Timothy J Duncan, Jose J Nieto, Edward Cheong, Nikolaos Burbos
{"title":"Learning curve for gynecological oncologists in performing upper abdominal surgery.","authors":"Mariaclelia La Russa,&nbsp;Chrysoula G Liakou,&nbsp;Nikolaos Akrivos,&nbsp;Hilary L Turnbull,&nbsp;Timothy J Duncan,&nbsp;Jose J Nieto,&nbsp;Edward Cheong,&nbsp;Nikolaos Burbos","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04605-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To assess the learning curve for gynecological oncologists in performing upper abdominal surgery for management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for stage IIIC and IV EOC that required at least one surgical procedure in the upper abdomen were divided in three numerically equal groups: group 1, 2 and 3 that underwent surgery between December 2012 and July 2014, August 2014 to March 2016 and April 2016 to March 2018 respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-six patients were included. The percentage of patients undergoing primary surgery for group 1, 2 and 3 was 47.6%, 50.0% and 73.8%, respectively (P=0.02). There was significant increase in the percentage of patients undergoing cholecystectomy (P=0.02), resection of disease from porta hepatis (P=0.008), liver capsulectomy (P<0.001), lesser omentectomy (P<0.001) and celiac trunk lymphadenectomy (P<0.001) in the group 3. There was no difference in the percentage of patients undergoing splenectomy, diaphragmatic peritonectomy/resection and gastrectomy. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 54.8%, 35.7% and 64.3% of patients in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade 3-5 complications. Presence of a liver surgeon was required in 9.1%, 5.6% and 0% of cases in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results reflect the evolution of surgical skills in the upper abdomen through the increase in the percentage of patients undergoing primary surgery, with the surgical team undertaking more complex procedures, less involvement of other specialties and simultaneously achieving higher rates of complete cytoreduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":18745,"journal":{"name":"Minerva ginecologica","volume":" ","pages":"325-331"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva ginecologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.20.04605-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: To assess the learning curve for gynecological oncologists in performing upper abdominal surgery for management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods: Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for stage IIIC and IV EOC that required at least one surgical procedure in the upper abdomen were divided in three numerically equal groups: group 1, 2 and 3 that underwent surgery between December 2012 and July 2014, August 2014 to March 2016 and April 2016 to March 2018 respectively.

Results: One hundred and twenty-six patients were included. The percentage of patients undergoing primary surgery for group 1, 2 and 3 was 47.6%, 50.0% and 73.8%, respectively (P=0.02). There was significant increase in the percentage of patients undergoing cholecystectomy (P=0.02), resection of disease from porta hepatis (P=0.008), liver capsulectomy (P<0.001), lesser omentectomy (P<0.001) and celiac trunk lymphadenectomy (P<0.001) in the group 3. There was no difference in the percentage of patients undergoing splenectomy, diaphragmatic peritonectomy/resection and gastrectomy. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 54.8%, 35.7% and 64.3% of patients in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade 3-5 complications. Presence of a liver surgeon was required in 9.1%, 5.6% and 0% of cases in group 1, 2 and 3 respectively.

Conclusions: The results reflect the evolution of surgical skills in the upper abdomen through the increase in the percentage of patients undergoing primary surgery, with the surgical team undertaking more complex procedures, less involvement of other specialties and simultaneously achieving higher rates of complete cytoreduction.

妇科肿瘤学家进行上腹部手术的学习曲线。
背景:评估妇科肿瘤学家在实施上腹部手术治疗晚期上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者时的学习曲线。方法:将接受上腹部至少一次手术的IIIC期和IV期EOC细胞减少手术的患者分为数字相等的三组:1组、2组和3组,分别于2012年12月至2014年7月、2014年8月至2016年3月和2016年4月至2018年3月进行手术。结果:共纳入126例患者。第1、2、3组患者接受首次手术的比例分别为47.6%、50.0%、73.8% (P=0.02)。行胆囊切除术(P=0.02)、肝门切除术(P=0.008)、肝包膜切除术(P=0.008)的患者比例显著增加。结果反映了上腹部手术技术的发展,接受初级手术的患者比例增加,手术团队承担更复杂的手术,更少地参与其他专业,同时实现更高的完全细胞减少率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva ginecologica
Minerva ginecologica OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Ginecologica publishes scientific papers on obstetrics and gynecology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信