Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Real-World Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Analytical Cellular Pathology Pub Date : 2020-06-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/6813492
Yan Huang, Linli Duan, Wenjun He, Cheng Hong, Yehui Guo, Xinni Wang, Nuofu Zhang, Yanghang Chen, Tao Wang, Jian Wang, Chunli Liu
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Real-World Study.","authors":"Yan Huang,&nbsp;Linli Duan,&nbsp;Wenjun He,&nbsp;Cheng Hong,&nbsp;Yehui Guo,&nbsp;Xinni Wang,&nbsp;Nuofu Zhang,&nbsp;Yanghang Chen,&nbsp;Tao Wang,&nbsp;Jian Wang,&nbsp;Chunli Liu","doi":"10.1155/2020/6813492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease. Target-specific anticoagulant rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that can be safely used without laboratory monitoring.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism in real-world clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a semiretrospective, semiprospective, and real-world trial involving 128 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without active tumor or frailty. We compared rivaroxaban to the standard therapy consisting of low-molecular-weight heparin combined with warfarin. The primary efficacy outcome was absorption of thrombus. The principal safety outcome was bleeding episode.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in thrombus absorption between rivaroxaban and standard therapy after 3-month treatment (<i>P</i> = 0.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.686 to 1.336) or more than 6-month treatment (<i>P</i> = 0.534, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.795 to 1.556). There was no decline in efficacy (including computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and recurrence) when the rivaroxaban dose was reduced to 10 mg once daily after 3 months of administration. The ratio of patients without bleeding was 48.84% for rivaroxaban and 19.05% for standard therapy (<i>P</i> = 0.001). There was no significant difference in rivaroxaban monotherapy subgroups (including frail patients, tumor patients, and thrombolysis or nonthrombolysis at intermediate-high-risk patients).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this real-world study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban alone was not different to standard therapy for pulmonary emboli absorption. With an extension in treatment duration, the rivaroxaban regimen had a higher efficacy and safety than standard therapy and there was no decline in treatment efficacy when the rivaroxaban dose was reduced to 10 mg once daily.</p>","PeriodicalId":49326,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Cellular Pathology","volume":"2020 ","pages":"6813492"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/6813492","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Cellular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6813492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life-threatening disease. Target-specific anticoagulant rivaroxaban is a direct factor Xa inhibitor that can be safely used without laboratory monitoring.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of acute pulmonary thromboembolism in real-world clinical practice.

Method: This was a semiretrospective, semiprospective, and real-world trial involving 128 patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism with or without active tumor or frailty. We compared rivaroxaban to the standard therapy consisting of low-molecular-weight heparin combined with warfarin. The primary efficacy outcome was absorption of thrombus. The principal safety outcome was bleeding episode.

Results: There was no significant difference in thrombus absorption between rivaroxaban and standard therapy after 3-month treatment (P = 0.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.686 to 1.336) or more than 6-month treatment (P = 0.534, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.795 to 1.556). There was no decline in efficacy (including computed tomographic pulmonary angiography and recurrence) when the rivaroxaban dose was reduced to 10 mg once daily after 3 months of administration. The ratio of patients without bleeding was 48.84% for rivaroxaban and 19.05% for standard therapy (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in rivaroxaban monotherapy subgroups (including frail patients, tumor patients, and thrombolysis or nonthrombolysis at intermediate-high-risk patients).

Conclusion: In this real-world study, the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban alone was not different to standard therapy for pulmonary emboli absorption. With an extension in treatment duration, the rivaroxaban regimen had a higher efficacy and safety than standard therapy and there was no decline in treatment efficacy when the rivaroxaban dose was reduced to 10 mg once daily.

利伐沙班与华法林治疗急性肺栓塞的疗效和安全性:一项真实世界的研究。
背景:肺栓塞是一种危及生命的疾病。靶向抗凝药物利伐沙班是一种直接的Xa因子抑制剂,无需实验室监测即可安全使用。目的:探讨利伐沙班与华法林治疗急性肺血栓栓塞的临床疗效和安全性。方法:这是一项半回顾性、半前瞻性和现实世界的试验,涉及128例伴有或不伴有活动性肿瘤或虚弱的急性症状性肺栓塞患者。我们将利伐沙班与由低分子肝素联合华法林组成的标准治疗进行了比较。主要疗效指标为血栓的吸收。主要的安全性结果是出血事件。结果:利伐沙班治疗3个月后(P = 0.798, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.686 ~ 1.336)和治疗6个月以上(P = 0.534, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.795 ~ 1.556)血栓吸收与标准治疗无显著差异。当利伐沙班剂量在给药3个月后减少到10mg每日一次时,疗效(包括肺血管ct和复发)没有下降。利伐沙班组无出血患者比例为48.84%,标准治疗组为19.05% (P = 0.001)。利伐沙班单药治疗亚组(包括体弱患者、肿瘤患者、溶栓或非溶栓的中高危患者)无显著差异。结论:在这项现实世界的研究中,单独使用利伐沙班治疗肺栓塞吸收的疗效和安全性与标准治疗没有区别。随着治疗时间的延长,利伐沙班方案比标准治疗具有更高的疗效和安全性,并且当利伐沙班剂量减少到10mg每日一次时,治疗效果没有下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Cellular Pathology
Analytical Cellular Pathology ONCOLOGY-CELL BIOLOGY
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
70
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Analytical Cellular Pathology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for scientists, medical practitioners and pathologists working in the area of cellular pathology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to cytology, carcinogenesis, cell receptors, biomarkers, diagnostic pathology, immunopathology, and hematology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信