Effects of Tribochemical Silica Coating and Alumina-Particle Air Abrasion on 3Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP: Evaluation of Surface Hardness, Roughness, Bonding, and Phase Transformation.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bingzhuo Chen, Yue Yan, Haifeng Xie, Hongliang Meng, Huaiqin Zhang, Chen Chen
{"title":"Effects of Tribochemical Silica Coating and Alumina-Particle Air Abrasion on 3Y-TZP and 5Y-TZP: Evaluation of Surface Hardness, Roughness, Bonding, and Phase Transformation.","authors":"Bingzhuo Chen,&nbsp;Yue Yan,&nbsp;Haifeng Xie,&nbsp;Hongliang Meng,&nbsp;Huaiqin Zhang,&nbsp;Chen Chen","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.a44868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine and compare the effects of tribochemical silica coating and alumina-particle air abrasion on 3 mol% and 5 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two different 3Y-TZP samples (Lava Plus, 3M Oral Care; Ceramill Zolid, Amann Girrbach) and one 5Y-TZP sample (Katana Zirconia UTML, Kuraray Noritake) were prepared and treated with alumina-particle air abrasion and a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP)-containing self-adhesive composite cement or with tribochemical silica coating followed by silanization (n = 30). Resin columns were cemented onto the treated ceramic surfaces to form specimens. After 24-h water storage or aging with 10,000 thermocycles plus 60-day water storage, shear bond strength (SBS) testing was conducted. Surface roughness, surface Vickers hardness, and crystallographic phase analyses were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SBS of tribochemically silica-coated 5Y-TZP before and after aging were 13.8 ± 1.4 and 13.2 ± 1.5 MPa, resp., for Lava Plus (3Y-TZP) 14.4 ± 1.4 and 13.9 ± 1.6 MPa, respectively, and for Ceramill Zolid (3Y-TZP) 14.8 ± 1.1 and 13.9 ± 1.5 MPa, respectively. There was no statistical difference between tribochemical silica coating and alumina air abrasion treatments (p = 0.21) on the bonding performance (SBS) of the 3Y-TZPs and 5Y-TZP (p = 0.25) before and after aging (p = 0.50). After alumina air abrasion, 5Y-TZP showed higher surface roughness (Ra = 1.7 ± 0.1) than did the 3Y-TZPs (Ra = 1.2 ± 0.1 for Lava Plus; Ra = 1.2 ± 0.1 for Ceramill Zolid), while the Vickers hardness was similar among the three materials (p = 0.70). Monoclinic zirconia was not detected in 5Y-TZP irrespective of treatment, with the zirconia being mainly cubic phase. However, the 3Y-TZPs were mainly tetragonal phase with some monoclinic zirconia; the latter increased after being alumina-particle air abraded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The bond strength to 5Y-TZP is similar to those of the 3Y-TZPs under the same bonding strategies. Durable bonding can be achieved both by alumina air abrasion combined with a 10-MDP-containing self-adhesive composite cement and by tribochemical silica coating followed by silanization for both the 3Y-TZPs and 5Y-TZP.</p>","PeriodicalId":55604,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","volume":"22 4","pages":"373-382"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3290/j.jad.a44868","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adhesive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.a44868","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Purpose: To determine and compare the effects of tribochemical silica coating and alumina-particle air abrasion on 3 mol% and 5 mol% yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystals (Y-TZP).

Materials and methods: Two different 3Y-TZP samples (Lava Plus, 3M Oral Care; Ceramill Zolid, Amann Girrbach) and one 5Y-TZP sample (Katana Zirconia UTML, Kuraray Noritake) were prepared and treated with alumina-particle air abrasion and a 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (10-MDP)-containing self-adhesive composite cement or with tribochemical silica coating followed by silanization (n = 30). Resin columns were cemented onto the treated ceramic surfaces to form specimens. After 24-h water storage or aging with 10,000 thermocycles plus 60-day water storage, shear bond strength (SBS) testing was conducted. Surface roughness, surface Vickers hardness, and crystallographic phase analyses were also performed.

Results: The SBS of tribochemically silica-coated 5Y-TZP before and after aging were 13.8 ± 1.4 and 13.2 ± 1.5 MPa, resp., for Lava Plus (3Y-TZP) 14.4 ± 1.4 and 13.9 ± 1.6 MPa, respectively, and for Ceramill Zolid (3Y-TZP) 14.8 ± 1.1 and 13.9 ± 1.5 MPa, respectively. There was no statistical difference between tribochemical silica coating and alumina air abrasion treatments (p = 0.21) on the bonding performance (SBS) of the 3Y-TZPs and 5Y-TZP (p = 0.25) before and after aging (p = 0.50). After alumina air abrasion, 5Y-TZP showed higher surface roughness (Ra = 1.7 ± 0.1) than did the 3Y-TZPs (Ra = 1.2 ± 0.1 for Lava Plus; Ra = 1.2 ± 0.1 for Ceramill Zolid), while the Vickers hardness was similar among the three materials (p = 0.70). Monoclinic zirconia was not detected in 5Y-TZP irrespective of treatment, with the zirconia being mainly cubic phase. However, the 3Y-TZPs were mainly tetragonal phase with some monoclinic zirconia; the latter increased after being alumina-particle air abraded.

Conclusion: The bond strength to 5Y-TZP is similar to those of the 3Y-TZPs under the same bonding strategies. Durable bonding can be achieved both by alumina air abrasion combined with a 10-MDP-containing self-adhesive composite cement and by tribochemical silica coating followed by silanization for both the 3Y-TZPs and 5Y-TZP.

摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层和Alumina-Particle空气磨损on 3Y-TZP和5Y-TZP:表面硬度、粗糙度、结合和相变的评价。
目的:测定并比较摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层和铝颗粒空气磨损对3mol %和5mol %氧化钇稳定的四方氧化锆多晶(Y-TZP)的影响。材料和方法:两种不同的3Y-TZP样品(Lava Plus, 3M Oral Care;制备了Ceramill Zolid, Amann Girrbach)和1个5Y-TZP样品(Katana Zirconia UTML, Kuraray Noritake),并采用氧化铝颗粒空气磨损和含10-甲基丙烯酰氧decyl磷酸二氢(10-MDP)的自粘复合水泥或摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层进行硅烷化处理(n = 30)。树脂柱被粘接在处理过的陶瓷表面形成试样。经过24 h的水储存或1万次热循环+ 60天的水储存,进行剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试。表面粗糙度,表面维氏硬度和晶体相分析也进行了。结果:5Y-TZP老化前后的SBS分别为13.8±1.4 MPa和13.2±1.5 MPa;, Lava Plus (3Y-TZP)分别为14.4±1.4和13.9±1.6 MPa, Ceramill Zolid (3Y-TZP)分别为14.8±1.1和13.9±1.5 MPa。3y - tzp和5Y-TZP在时效前后(p = 0.50)的结合性能(SBS)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.21),摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层与氧化铝空气磨损处理(p = 0.21)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.25)。5Y-TZP的表面粗糙度(Ra = 1.7±0.1)高于3y - tzp (Lava Plus的Ra = 1.2±0.1);陶瓷陶瓷的Ra = 1.2±0.1),三种材料的维氏硬度相似(p = 0.70)。不论处理方式如何,5Y-TZP均未检出单斜相氧化锆,氧化锆以立方相为主。而3Y-TZPs主要为四方相,含有少量单斜氧化锆;经铝颗粒空气研磨后,后者增大。结论:在相同的键合策略下,5Y-TZP与3y - tzp的键合强度相似。对于3y - tzp和5Y-TZP,可以通过氧化铝空气磨蚀结合含有10- mdp的自粘复合水泥,以及摩擦化学二氧化硅涂层,然后进行硅烷化,从而实现持久的粘合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry
Journal of Adhesive Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: New materials and applications for adhesion are profoundly changing the way dentistry is delivered. Bonding techniques, which have long been restricted to the tooth hard tissues, enamel, and dentin, have obvious applications in operative and preventive dentistry, as well as in esthetic and pediatric dentistry, prosthodontics, and orthodontics. The current development of adhesive techniques for soft tissues and slow-releasing agents will expand applications to include periodontics and oral surgery. Scientifically sound, peer-reviewed articles explore the latest innovations in these emerging fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信