Identifying responders and nonresponders to interferon therapy in multiple sclerosis.

Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease Pub Date : 2014-04-01 eCollection Date: 2014-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DNND.S42734
Luca Prosperini, Marco Capobianco, Costanza Giannì
{"title":"Identifying responders and nonresponders to interferon therapy in multiple sclerosis.","authors":"Luca Prosperini, Marco Capobianco, Costanza Giannì","doi":"10.2147/DNND.S42734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interferon beta is a well established disease-modifying agent used for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite treatment, a relevant proportion of patients continue to experience clinical (ie, relapses, worsening of disability) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity. Early identification of responders and nonresponders to interferon beta is strongly recommended to select patients who need a prompt switch to another disease-modifying agent and to ultimately avoid accumulation of fixed disability over time. Detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta can be challenging, mainly because of the lack of a clear and shared clinical definition of response to treatment. Clinical features at the start of treatment should be considered as prognostic factors, but MRI parameters assessed during treatment, such as contrast-enhancing lesions or new T2-hyperintense lesions, may be sensitive markers of response to interferon beta. Quantitative scoring systems derived from a combination of relapses and MRI activity have recently been proposed as practical tools for use in the everyday clinical setting. Blood biomarkers, such as neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta and Myxovirus resistance protein A, provide further useful information for detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta. However, since the presence of neutralizing antibodies can only partially explain the nonresponse to interferon beta, biomarkers of interferon beta activity possibly related to the pathogenesis of the disease could represent a future step toward a tailored, long-lasting effective treatment against multiple sclerosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11147,"journal":{"name":"Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease","volume":"4 ","pages":"75-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/e7/DNND-4-75.PMC7337239.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DNND.S42734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2014/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interferon beta is a well established disease-modifying agent used for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Despite treatment, a relevant proportion of patients continue to experience clinical (ie, relapses, worsening of disability) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity. Early identification of responders and nonresponders to interferon beta is strongly recommended to select patients who need a prompt switch to another disease-modifying agent and to ultimately avoid accumulation of fixed disability over time. Detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta can be challenging, mainly because of the lack of a clear and shared clinical definition of response to treatment. Clinical features at the start of treatment should be considered as prognostic factors, but MRI parameters assessed during treatment, such as contrast-enhancing lesions or new T2-hyperintense lesions, may be sensitive markers of response to interferon beta. Quantitative scoring systems derived from a combination of relapses and MRI activity have recently been proposed as practical tools for use in the everyday clinical setting. Blood biomarkers, such as neutralizing antibodies to interferon beta and Myxovirus resistance protein A, provide further useful information for detecting responders and nonresponders to interferon beta. However, since the presence of neutralizing antibodies can only partially explain the nonresponse to interferon beta, biomarkers of interferon beta activity possibly related to the pathogenesis of the disease could represent a future step toward a tailored, long-lasting effective treatment against multiple sclerosis.

Abstract Image

识别多发性硬化症干扰素疗法的应答者和非应答者。
β干扰素是一种治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成熟药物。尽管接受了治疗,但仍有相当一部分患者继续出现临床(即复发、残疾恶化)和磁共振成像(MRI)活动。强烈建议及早识别对β干扰素有反应和无反应的患者,以选择需要及时转用另一种疾病改变药物的患者,并最终避免固定残疾随着时间的推移而累积。检测干扰素 beta 的应答者和非应答者可能具有挑战性,这主要是因为缺乏对治疗应答的明确和共同的临床定义。治疗开始时的临床特征应被视为预后因素,但在治疗期间评估的 MRI 参数,如对比度增强病灶或新的 T2-高密度病灶,可能是干扰素 beta 反应的敏感标记。根据复发和磁共振成像活动综合得出的定量评分系统最近已被提出作为日常临床环境中使用的实用工具。血液生物标志物,如干扰素β的中和抗体和肌瘤病毒抗性蛋白A,为检测干扰素β的应答者和非应答者提供了更多有用的信息。然而,由于中和抗体的存在只能部分解释对β干扰素无应答的情况,可能与疾病发病机制有关的β干扰素活性生物标志物可能代表着未来向量身定制、长期有效的多发性硬化症治疗迈出的一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信