[Knowledge and attitude about Pharmacovigilance practices of pharmacy professionals of community pharmacy and hospital pharmacy in Spain.]

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica Pub Date : 2020-07-16
Rafael Lozano Fernández, Ernesto Vera Sánchez, Mª Del Carmen Lozano Estevan, Mariano Madurga Sanz, Ana Serna Núñez
{"title":"[Knowledge and attitude about Pharmacovigilance practices of pharmacy professionals of community pharmacy and hospital pharmacy in Spain.]","authors":"Rafael Lozano Fernández, Ernesto Vera Sánchez, Mª Del Carmen Lozano Estevan, Mariano Madurga Sanz, Ana Serna Núñez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The justification of the study was to assess the degree of knowledge of Spanish pharmacists in the field of Pharmacovigilance, their degree of notification of adverse drug reactions and their need for training, establishing the differences between community pharmacy pharmacist and those of hospital pharmacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire with twelve questions on Pharmacovigilance was designed. The distribution and collection of the questionnaires were carried out via online in collaboration with the Official Colleges of Pharmacists and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy during the period from November 2018 to June 2019. The target population were the pharmacists registered or belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. The results were processed using a descriptive and analytical analysis. The qualitative variables were presented with their frequency distribution and the quantitative with their mean and standard deviation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>99% of hospital pharmacists said they had evidence of suspected adverse reactions and 96.9% of them ever reported. 73.5% of community pharmacists stated that they had knowledge of suspected adverse reactions but only 48.7% confirmed that they notified them. In general, the pharmacists surveyed agreed on the importance of Pharmacovigilance and believed that the quality of treatments could be improved and the Spanish health system would be saved if Pharmacovigilance was applied more.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results indicated that hospital pharmacists report much more adverse drug reactions than community pharmacist does. It also hospital pharmacists who know best the obligations they have with Pharmacovigilance. The surveyed pharmacists thought that the development of actions in Pharmacovigilance would increase the adherence of pharmaceutical professionals to the notification and would imply improvements in the quality of treatments, the rational use of medications and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":47152,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","volume":"94 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Salud Publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The justification of the study was to assess the degree of knowledge of Spanish pharmacists in the field of Pharmacovigilance, their degree of notification of adverse drug reactions and their need for training, establishing the differences between community pharmacy pharmacist and those of hospital pharmacy.

Methods: A questionnaire with twelve questions on Pharmacovigilance was designed. The distribution and collection of the questionnaires were carried out via online in collaboration with the Official Colleges of Pharmacists and the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy during the period from November 2018 to June 2019. The target population were the pharmacists registered or belonging to the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy. The results were processed using a descriptive and analytical analysis. The qualitative variables were presented with their frequency distribution and the quantitative with their mean and standard deviation.

Results: 99% of hospital pharmacists said they had evidence of suspected adverse reactions and 96.9% of them ever reported. 73.5% of community pharmacists stated that they had knowledge of suspected adverse reactions but only 48.7% confirmed that they notified them. In general, the pharmacists surveyed agreed on the importance of Pharmacovigilance and believed that the quality of treatments could be improved and the Spanish health system would be saved if Pharmacovigilance was applied more.

Conclusions: Our results indicated that hospital pharmacists report much more adverse drug reactions than community pharmacist does. It also hospital pharmacists who know best the obligations they have with Pharmacovigilance. The surveyed pharmacists thought that the development of actions in Pharmacovigilance would increase the adherence of pharmaceutical professionals to the notification and would imply improvements in the quality of treatments, the rational use of medications and patient safety.

西班牙社区药房和医院药房药学专业人员对药物警戒做法的认识和态度] [Knowledge and attitude about Pharmacovigilance practices of pharmacy professionals of community pharmacy and hospital pharmacy.
研究目的本研究的目的是评估西班牙药剂师在药物警戒领域的知识水平、对药物不良反应的知情程度以及对培训的需求,并确定社区药房药剂师与医院药房药剂师之间的差异:方法:设计了一份包含 12 个药物警戒问题的调查问卷。在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,与药剂师官方学院和西班牙医院药学协会合作,通过在线方式分发和收集问卷。目标人群是西班牙医院药学协会注册或所属的药剂师。研究结果采用描述性和分析性分析方法进行处理。定性变量用频率分布表示,定量变量用平均值和标准差表示:结果:99% 的医院药剂师表示他们有可疑不良反应的证据,其中 96.9% 曾经报告过。73.5%的社区药剂师表示他们对可疑不良反应有所了解,但只有 48.7% 的社区药剂师确认他们曾报告过可疑不良反应。总的来说,接受调查的药剂师都认同药物警戒的重要性,并认为如果能更多地应用药物警戒,治疗质量将得到改善,西班牙的医疗系统也将得到节省:我们的调查结果表明,医院药剂师报告的药物不良反应比社区药剂师报告的要多得多。同时,医院药剂师也最了解他们在药物警戒方面的义务。接受调查的药剂师认为,开展药物警戒行动将提高药剂专业人员对通知的遵守程度,并将意味着治疗质量、合理用药和患者安全的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica
Revista Espanola De Salud Publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
106
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信