Development and validation of an instrument for procedure-related death notification.

IF 1.2
F K Orr, C Keyes, A Alli
{"title":"Development and validation of an instrument for procedure-related death notification.","authors":"F K Orr,&nbsp;C Keyes,&nbsp;A Alli","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anaesthesia-related mortality is an important, potentially avoidable cause of perioperative mortality. A procedure-related death notification (PRDN) instrument is completed by relevant medical practitioners after a procedure-related death and is used to audit practice and identify areas of care that require improvement. It is also used in medicolegal investigations when establishing cause of death, and in the case of litigation. The current South African (SA) PRDN instrument, designated the GW7/24 form, contains both surgical and anaesthetic sections and is considered to be outdated, inadequate and in need of revision.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop and validate a revised anaesthetic section of the SA PRDN instrument that can be used for procedure-related deaths in future and be used to update the GW7/24 form for epidemiological, forensic or academic use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Lynn's two-stage model was utilised. After an extensive literature review, a provisional PRDN instrument was developed. This provisional instrument was debated and reviewed at a peer group discussion in which 6 local experts took part. These experts were anaesthetic and forensic pathology specialists who specifically have expert knowledge on procedure-related deaths. A revised PRDN instrument was developed, which was then rated by 8 national experts using a Likert scale. The content validity index (CVI) for each item and for the instrument as a whole was then established. Items with a CVI &lt;0.88 were removed to formulate the final PRDN instrument.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The provisional PRDN instrument consisted of 14 domains and 66 items. The revised PRDN instrument consisted of 13 domains and 65 items, of which 3 items with a CVI &lt;0.88 were removed. The final PRDN instrument, after minor revisions based on suggestions from the 8 national experts, consisted of 18 domains and 79 items. Every item on the form was declared relevant and important by the national experts, with the final instrument scoring an overall CVI of 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A comprehensive, updated and validated anaesthetic section of the SA PRDN instrument was developed. This could be used as a government and anaesthesiology society-endorsed template when updating the current GW7/24 form.</p>","PeriodicalId":520778,"journal":{"name":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","volume":" ","pages":"140-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14083","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020.v110i2.14083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anaesthesia-related mortality is an important, potentially avoidable cause of perioperative mortality. A procedure-related death notification (PRDN) instrument is completed by relevant medical practitioners after a procedure-related death and is used to audit practice and identify areas of care that require improvement. It is also used in medicolegal investigations when establishing cause of death, and in the case of litigation. The current South African (SA) PRDN instrument, designated the GW7/24 form, contains both surgical and anaesthetic sections and is considered to be outdated, inadequate and in need of revision.

Objectives: To develop and validate a revised anaesthetic section of the SA PRDN instrument that can be used for procedure-related deaths in future and be used to update the GW7/24 form for epidemiological, forensic or academic use.

Methods: Lynn's two-stage model was utilised. After an extensive literature review, a provisional PRDN instrument was developed. This provisional instrument was debated and reviewed at a peer group discussion in which 6 local experts took part. These experts were anaesthetic and forensic pathology specialists who specifically have expert knowledge on procedure-related deaths. A revised PRDN instrument was developed, which was then rated by 8 national experts using a Likert scale. The content validity index (CVI) for each item and for the instrument as a whole was then established. Items with a CVI <0.88 were removed to formulate the final PRDN instrument.

Results: The provisional PRDN instrument consisted of 14 domains and 66 items. The revised PRDN instrument consisted of 13 domains and 65 items, of which 3 items with a CVI <0.88 were removed. The final PRDN instrument, after minor revisions based on suggestions from the 8 national experts, consisted of 18 domains and 79 items. Every item on the form was declared relevant and important by the national experts, with the final instrument scoring an overall CVI of 1.

Conclusions: A comprehensive, updated and validated anaesthetic section of the SA PRDN instrument was developed. This could be used as a government and anaesthesiology society-endorsed template when updating the current GW7/24 form.

与程序有关的死亡通知文书的开发和验证。
背景:麻醉相关死亡率是围手术期死亡率中一个重要的、潜在的可避免的原因。与程序有关的死亡通知(PRDN)文书是在与程序有关的死亡后由相关医生完成的,用于审计实践和确定需要改进的护理领域。在确定死因和诉讼案件时,它也用于法医调查。目前南非(SA) PRDN器械,指定为GW7/24形式,包含手术和麻醉部分,被认为是过时的,不充分的,需要修订。目的:开发和验证经修订的SA PRDN仪器麻醉部分,可用于未来与手术相关的死亡,并用于更新GW7/24表格,以供流行病学、法医或学术使用。方法:采用Lynn的两阶段模型。经过广泛的文献回顾,开发了一种临时PRDN仪器。这项临时文书在6名当地专家参加的同行小组讨论中进行了辩论和审查。这些专家是麻醉和法医病理学专家,他们对与手术有关的死亡有专门的专业知识。开发了一种修订后的PRDN工具,然后由8名国家专家使用李克特量表对其进行评分。然后建立每个项目和整个仪器的内容效度指数(CVI)。去除CVI <0.88的项目,制作最终的PRDN仪器。结果:暂定PRDN仪器由14个域66个项目组成。修订后的PRDN工具包括13个域和65个条目,其中3个CVI <0.88的条目被删除。根据8位国家专家的建议,最后的PRDN文书经过小幅度修订后,包括18个领域和79个项目。表格上的每个项目都由国家专家宣布相关和重要,最终仪器的总体CVI得分为1。结论:开发了一种全面、更新和有效的SA PRDN麻醉切片。在更新当前的GW7/24表格时,这可以用作政府和麻醉学会认可的模板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信