Blood pressure variability within a single visit and all-cause mortality.

4区 医学 Q3 Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine Pub Date : 2020-07-01
T G Papaioannou, G Georgiopoulos, K S Stamatelopoulos, A D Protogerou, K I Alexandraki, A Argyris, D A Vrachatis, D Soulis, A Papanikolaou, D Manolesou, S S Daskalopoulou, D Tousoulis
{"title":"Blood pressure variability within a single visit and all-cause mortality.","authors":"T G Papaioannou,&nbsp;G Georgiopoulos,&nbsp;K S Stamatelopoulos,&nbsp;A D Protogerou,&nbsp;K I Alexandraki,&nbsp;A Argyris,&nbsp;D A Vrachatis,&nbsp;D Soulis,&nbsp;A Papanikolaou,&nbsp;D Manolesou,&nbsp;S S Daskalopoulou,&nbsp;D Tousoulis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±;19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":18918,"journal":{"name":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Netherlands Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Within-visit variability of repeated sequential readings of blood pressure (BP) is an important phenomenon that may affect precision of BP measurement and thus decision making concerning BP-related risk and hypertension management. However, limited data exist concerning predictive ability of within-visit BP variability for clinical outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the association between the variability of three repeated office BP measurements and the risk of all-cause mortality, independent of BP levels.

Methods: Data collected through the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were analysed. NHANES is a program of studies designed to assess health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. A complete set of three sequential BP measurements, together with survival status, were available for 24969 individuals (age 46.8±;19.3 years, 49% males). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the prognostic ability of the examined demographic, clinical, and haemodynamic indices.

Results: Among various examined indices of variability of systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure measurements, the standard deviation of DBP (DBPSD) was the stronger independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.064, 95% Confidence Interval: 1.011-1.12) after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, SBP, heart rate, history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolaemia, and cardiovascular events.

Conclusion: Within-visit variability of three sequential office DBP readings may allow for the identification of high-risk patients better than mean SBP and DBP levels. The predictive value of within-visit BP variability and methods to improve its clinical application are worthy of further research.

单次就诊的血压变异性和全因死亡率。
背景:访内重复连续读数血压(BP)的变异性是一个重要的现象,它可能影响血压测量的精度,从而影响有关血压相关风险和高血压管理的决策。然而,关于门诊内血压变异性对临床结果的预测能力的数据有限。因此,我们的目的是调查三次重复办公室血压测量的变异性与独立于血压水平的全因死亡风险之间的关系。方法:对全国健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)收集的数据进行分析。NHANES是一个研究项目,旨在评估美国成人和儿童的健康和营养状况。24969例患者(年龄46.8±19.3岁,49%为男性)获得了完整的三组连续血压测量数据以及生存状况。使用多变量logistic回归模型来确定所检查的人口学、临床和血流动力学指标的预后能力。结果:在收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)测量变异性的各种检测指标中,在调整年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟、收缩压、心率、高血压史、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和心血管事件后,DBP (DBPSD)的标准差是更强的死亡率独立预测因子(优势比1.064,95%可信区间:1.011-1.12)。结论:三次连续办公室舒张压读数的访内变异性可能比平均收缩压和舒张压水平更好地识别高危患者。诊内血压变异性的预测价值及提高其临床应用的方法值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Netherlands Journal of Medicine
Netherlands Journal of Medicine 医学-医学:内科
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Netherlands Journal of Medicine publishes papers in all relevant fields of internal medicine. In addition to reports of original clinical and experimental studies, reviews on topics of interest or importance, case reports, book reviews and letters to the editor are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信