High Incidence of Burst Suppression during Propofol Sedation for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Lessons Learned from Neuromonitoring.

IF 1.6 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2020-06-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/7246570
Jamie Bloom, David Wyler, Marc C Torjman, Tuan Trinh, Lucy Li, Amy Mehta, Evan Fitchett, David Kastenberg, Michael Mahla, Victor Romo
{"title":"High Incidence of Burst Suppression during Propofol Sedation for Outpatient Colonoscopy: Lessons Learned from Neuromonitoring.","authors":"Jamie Bloom,&nbsp;David Wyler,&nbsp;Marc C Torjman,&nbsp;Tuan Trinh,&nbsp;Lucy Li,&nbsp;Amy Mehta,&nbsp;Evan Fitchett,&nbsp;David Kastenberg,&nbsp;Michael Mahla,&nbsp;Victor Romo","doi":"10.1155/2020/7246570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although anesthesia providers may plan for moderate sedation, the depth of sedation is rarely quantified. Using processed electroencephalography (EEG) to assess the depth of sedation, this study investigates the incidence of general anesthesia with variable burst suppression in patients receiving propofol for outpatient colonoscopy. The lessons learned from neuromonitoring can then be used to guide institutional best sedation practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study of 119 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH). Propofol was administered by CRNAs under anesthesiologists' supervision. The Patient State Index (PSi™) generated by the Masimo SedLine® Brain Root Function monitor (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) was used to assess the depth of sedation. PSi data correlating to general anesthesia with variable burst suppression were confirmed by neuroelectrophysiologists' interpretation of unprocessed EEG.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PSi values of <50 consistent with general anesthesia were attained in 118/119 (99.1%) patients. Of these patients, 33 (27.7%) attained PSi values <25 consistent with variable burst suppression. The 118 patients that reached PSi <50 spent a significantly greater percentage (53.1% vs. 42%) of their case at PSi levels <50 compared to PSi levels >50 (<i>p</i>=0.001). Mean total propofol dose was significantly correlated to patient PSi during periods of PSi <25 (<i>R</i>=0.406, <i>p</i>=0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although providers planned for moderate to deep sedation, processed EEG showed patients were under general anesthesia, often with burst suppression. Anesthesiologists and endoscopists may utilize processed EEG to recognize their institutional practice patterns of procedural sedation with propofol and improve upon it.</p>","PeriodicalId":7834,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","volume":"2020 ","pages":"7246570"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/7246570","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7246570","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Although anesthesia providers may plan for moderate sedation, the depth of sedation is rarely quantified. Using processed electroencephalography (EEG) to assess the depth of sedation, this study investigates the incidence of general anesthesia with variable burst suppression in patients receiving propofol for outpatient colonoscopy. The lessons learned from neuromonitoring can then be used to guide institutional best sedation practice.

Methods: This was a prospective observational study of 119 outpatients undergoing colonoscopy at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (TJUH). Propofol was administered by CRNAs under anesthesiologists' supervision. The Patient State Index (PSi™) generated by the Masimo SedLine® Brain Root Function monitor (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA) was used to assess the depth of sedation. PSi data correlating to general anesthesia with variable burst suppression were confirmed by neuroelectrophysiologists' interpretation of unprocessed EEG.

Results: PSi values of <50 consistent with general anesthesia were attained in 118/119 (99.1%) patients. Of these patients, 33 (27.7%) attained PSi values <25 consistent with variable burst suppression. The 118 patients that reached PSi <50 spent a significantly greater percentage (53.1% vs. 42%) of their case at PSi levels <50 compared to PSi levels >50 (p=0.001). Mean total propofol dose was significantly correlated to patient PSi during periods of PSi <25 (R=0.406, p=0.021).

Conclusion: Although providers planned for moderate to deep sedation, processed EEG showed patients were under general anesthesia, often with burst suppression. Anesthesiologists and endoscopists may utilize processed EEG to recognize their institutional practice patterns of procedural sedation with propofol and improve upon it.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

门诊结肠镜检查异丙酚镇静期间爆发抑制的高发生率:从神经监测中获得的经验教训。
背景:虽然麻醉提供者可能计划适度镇静,镇静的深度很少量化。采用处理脑电图(EEG)评估镇静深度,本研究调查了门诊结肠镜检查中接受异丙酚的患者的可变爆发抑制全麻发生率。从神经监测中吸取的经验教训可以用来指导机构的最佳镇静实践。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,119例在托马斯杰斐逊大学医院(TJUH)接受结肠镜检查的门诊患者。异丙酚在麻醉医师的监督下由crna给药。使用Masimo SedLine®脑根功能监测仪(Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA)生成的患者状态指数(PSi™)来评估镇静的深度。神经电生理学家对未处理脑电图的解释证实了与全身麻醉和可变爆发抑制相关的PSi数据。结果:PSi值为50 (p=0.001)。平均丙泊酚总剂量与PSi期间患者PSi显著相关(R=0.406, p=0.021)。结论:虽然医生计划给予中至深度镇静,但处理后的脑电图显示患者处于全麻状态,常伴有爆发抑制。麻醉医师和内窥镜医师可以利用处理后的脑电图来识别异丙酚程序性镇静的机构实践模式并加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信