Human Cells Grown With or Without Substitutes for Fetal Bovine Serum.

Cell medicine Pub Date : 2018-06-06 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2155179018755140
John E Piletz, Jennifer Drivon, John Eisenga, Will Buck, Sabrina Yen, Megan McLin, William Meruvia, Carolina Amaral, Kellie Brue
{"title":"Human Cells Grown With or Without Substitutes for Fetal Bovine Serum.","authors":"John E Piletz,&nbsp;Jennifer Drivon,&nbsp;John Eisenga,&nbsp;Will Buck,&nbsp;Sabrina Yen,&nbsp;Megan McLin,&nbsp;William Meruvia,&nbsp;Carolina Amaral,&nbsp;Kellie Brue","doi":"10.1177/2155179018755140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety concerns over cell-derived pharmaceutical products being manufactured in supplements of fetal bovine serum (FBS) have ignited pleas to replace FBS. Herein, four newly marketed alternatives to FBS were compared: a xeno-free product called Cell-Ess®, a human platelet lysate marketed as GroPro®, and two mixtures of adult bovine serum varying in their proportions of neonatal growth factors, called Liporo® and FetalGro®. An endothelial cell line (C2BBe1) and a neuronal cell line (SHSY5Y) near confluency in media with 10% FBS were selectively scraped and taken through a 25-day step-wise algorithm to replace FBS, and another human endothelial cell line (HRA-19) was studied to replicate C2BBe1. Cells were stained, counted, and compared for viability, migration, and spheroids. The C2BBe1 and HRA-19 cell lines failed to proliferate in 10% Cell-Ess® but grew in 10% GroPro® or 10% FetalGro® reasonably well compared to reference 10% FBS. With SH-SY5Y, only FetalGro® approached FBS's efficacy. These were all inferior to 11 different branded lots of FBS (positive controls), but five days into switching just amongst the FBS brands, 4 of 11 supported less proliferation than reference FBS in endothelial HRA-19 (<i>p</i> < 0.004). Moreover, neurospheres were enriched in two branded lots of FBS and FetalGro® (each <i>p</i> < 0.004), neurospheres being an unwanted phenotype for any neuronal cell application. Because platelet-derived GroPro® stood out amongst the non-FBS growth supplements to allow proliferation without inducing spheroids, it seems the best (mindful that the cells still grew slower in it compared to FBS). While no perfect replacement was found amongst the alternatives to FBS, the algorithm for switching should be useful in future testing of new alternatives to FBS as the need arises to switch from FBS and expand pharmaceutical products with safety for human use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9780,"journal":{"name":"Cell medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/2155179018755140","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2155179018755140","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Safety concerns over cell-derived pharmaceutical products being manufactured in supplements of fetal bovine serum (FBS) have ignited pleas to replace FBS. Herein, four newly marketed alternatives to FBS were compared: a xeno-free product called Cell-Ess®, a human platelet lysate marketed as GroPro®, and two mixtures of adult bovine serum varying in their proportions of neonatal growth factors, called Liporo® and FetalGro®. An endothelial cell line (C2BBe1) and a neuronal cell line (SHSY5Y) near confluency in media with 10% FBS were selectively scraped and taken through a 25-day step-wise algorithm to replace FBS, and another human endothelial cell line (HRA-19) was studied to replicate C2BBe1. Cells were stained, counted, and compared for viability, migration, and spheroids. The C2BBe1 and HRA-19 cell lines failed to proliferate in 10% Cell-Ess® but grew in 10% GroPro® or 10% FetalGro® reasonably well compared to reference 10% FBS. With SH-SY5Y, only FetalGro® approached FBS's efficacy. These were all inferior to 11 different branded lots of FBS (positive controls), but five days into switching just amongst the FBS brands, 4 of 11 supported less proliferation than reference FBS in endothelial HRA-19 (p < 0.004). Moreover, neurospheres were enriched in two branded lots of FBS and FetalGro® (each p < 0.004), neurospheres being an unwanted phenotype for any neuronal cell application. Because platelet-derived GroPro® stood out amongst the non-FBS growth supplements to allow proliferation without inducing spheroids, it seems the best (mindful that the cells still grew slower in it compared to FBS). While no perfect replacement was found amongst the alternatives to FBS, the algorithm for switching should be useful in future testing of new alternatives to FBS as the need arises to switch from FBS and expand pharmaceutical products with safety for human use.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

用或不用胎牛血清替代物培养的人类细胞。
对细胞衍生药物产品中添加胎牛血清(FBS)的安全性担忧引发了替换胎牛血清的请求。本文比较了四种新上市的FBS替代品:一种名为Cell-Ess®的无xeno产品,一种名为GroPro®的人血小板裂解液,以及两种不同比例的新生生长因子的成年牛血清混合物,称为Liporo®和FetalGro®。将内皮细胞系(C2BBe1)和神经元细胞系(SHSY5Y)在含有10%胎牛血清的培养基中有选择地刮取,并通过25天的逐步算法替换胎牛血清,并研究另一种人内皮细胞系(hla -19)复制C2BBe1。细胞染色,计数,并比较活力,迁移和球体。C2BBe1和hla -19细胞系在10% cell - ess®中增殖失败,但在10% GroPro®或10% FetalGro®中生长良好,与对照的10% FBS相比。与SH-SY5Y相比,只有FetalGro®接近FBS的疗效。这些都低于11种不同品牌的FBS(阳性对照),但在切换FBS品牌5天后,11种FBS中有4种支持内皮hla -19的增殖低于参考FBS (p < 0.004)。此外,神经球在两个品牌的FBS和FetalGro®中富集(各p < 0.004),对于任何神经元细胞应用来说,神经球是一种不需要的表型。因为血小板衍生的GroPro®在非FBS生长补充剂中脱颖而出,允许增殖而不诱导球体,它似乎是最好的(注意,与FBS相比,细胞在其中的生长速度仍然较慢)。虽然在FBS的替代品中没有发现完美的替代品,但切换算法在未来测试FBS的新替代品时应该是有用的,因为需要从FBS切换并扩展具有人类使用安全性的制药产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell medicine
Cell medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信