Safety and visual outcomes following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens bilensectomy.

Eye and vision (London, England) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-020-00200-8
Veronica Vargas, Jorge L Alió, Rafael I Barraquer, Justin Christopher D' Antin, Cristina García, Francisco Duch, Joan Balgos, Jorge L Alió Del Barrio
{"title":"Safety and visual outcomes following posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens bilensectomy.","authors":"Veronica Vargas,&nbsp;Jorge L Alió,&nbsp;Rafael I Barraquer,&nbsp;Justin Christopher D' Antin,&nbsp;Cristina García,&nbsp;Francisco Duch,&nbsp;Joan Balgos,&nbsp;Jorge L Alió Del Barrio","doi":"10.1186/s40662-020-00200-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the safety, efficacy, refractive outcomes and causes for bilensectomy (phakic intraocular lens - pIOL - explantation with cataract surgery and pseudophakic intraocular lens implantation) in patients previously implanted with posterior chamber pIOLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multi-center retrospective study included 87 eyes of 55 patients who underwent bilensectomy for posterior chamber pIOL with a follow up time of 12 months. The uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA, CDVA), endothelial cell density before and after bilensectomy were assessed, as well as the cause of bilensectomy and intra or postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant improvement in uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities after bilensectomy (<i>p</i> = 0.00). The main reason for bilensectomy was cataract development (93.1% of the cases), followed by miscalculation of lens size, and corneal edema. The endothelial cell count remained stable without a statistically significant change after surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.67). The refractive efficacy index was 0.8, none of the patients lost lines of CDVA after surgery, 73% of the patients were within ±1 D (spherical equivalent) of the target refraction. Intraoperative complications were one posterior capsule rupture with the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the sulcus, and 3 eyes required the use of pupil expanders for adequate pupil dilation. Postoperatively, one eye developed retinal detachment. The three pIOLs models explanted were the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), Implantable Phakic Contact Lens (IPCL) and the Phakic Refractive Lens (PRL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Good safety and visual outcomes were observed 1 year after bilensectomy for posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (PC pIOLs). There were few intra and postoperative complications and there was no significant endothelial cell loss after the bilensectomy procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00200-8","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00200-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, refractive outcomes and causes for bilensectomy (phakic intraocular lens - pIOL - explantation with cataract surgery and pseudophakic intraocular lens implantation) in patients previously implanted with posterior chamber pIOLs.

Methods: This multi-center retrospective study included 87 eyes of 55 patients who underwent bilensectomy for posterior chamber pIOL with a follow up time of 12 months. The uncorrected and best corrected distance visual acuities (UDVA, CDVA), endothelial cell density before and after bilensectomy were assessed, as well as the cause of bilensectomy and intra or postoperative complications.

Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in uncorrected and best corrected visual acuities after bilensectomy (p = 0.00). The main reason for bilensectomy was cataract development (93.1% of the cases), followed by miscalculation of lens size, and corneal edema. The endothelial cell count remained stable without a statistically significant change after surgery (p = 0.67). The refractive efficacy index was 0.8, none of the patients lost lines of CDVA after surgery, 73% of the patients were within ±1 D (spherical equivalent) of the target refraction. Intraoperative complications were one posterior capsule rupture with the intraocular lens (IOL) implanted in the sulcus, and 3 eyes required the use of pupil expanders for adequate pupil dilation. Postoperatively, one eye developed retinal detachment. The three pIOLs models explanted were the Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL), Implantable Phakic Contact Lens (IPCL) and the Phakic Refractive Lens (PRL).

Conclusions: Good safety and visual outcomes were observed 1 year after bilensectomy for posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses (PC pIOLs). There were few intra and postoperative complications and there was no significant endothelial cell loss after the bilensectomy procedure.

后房型晶状体双晶状体切除术后的安全性和视力结果。
背景:评价已植入后房型人工晶状体的患者行双囊切除术(晶状体人工晶状体植入术合并白内障手术和假晶状体人工晶状体植入术)的安全性、有效性、屈光结果和原因。方法:采用多中心回顾性研究方法,对55例行双胆管切除术治疗后房性pIOL的患者87眼进行随访,随访时间为12个月。评估双胆管切除术前后未矫正和最佳矫正距离视力(UDVA、CDVA)、内皮细胞密度,以及双胆管切除术及术后并发症的发生原因。结果:双肠切除术后未矫正视力和最佳矫正视力的改善有统计学意义(p = 0.00)。双胆切除术的主要原因是白内障发展(占93.1%),其次是晶状体大小计算错误和角膜水肿。术后内皮细胞计数保持稳定,无统计学意义变化(p = 0.67)。屈光效能指数为0.8,无一例患者术后CDVA线丢失,73%的患者在目标屈光±1 D(球面等效)范围内。术中并发症为1例后囊膜破裂并植入人工晶状体(IOL), 3例需要使用瞳孔扩张器进行瞳孔扩张。术后一只眼出现视网膜脱离。移植的三种piol模型分别是植入式Collamer Lens (ICL)、植入式Phakic Contact Lens (IPCL)和Phakic Refractive Lens (PRL)。结论:双脑切除术后房型晶状体人工晶状体(PC pIOLs)术后1年安全性和视力均良好。胆管切除术后,术中和术后并发症很少,内皮细胞无明显损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信