A Qualitative Exploration of Consumers' Perceived Impacts, Behavioural Reactions, and Future Reflections of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2017) as Applied to Electronic Cigarettes.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2020-06-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X20925458
Emma Ward, Claudia Anholt, Sarah Gentry, Lynne Dawkins, Richard Holland, Caitlin Notley
{"title":"A Qualitative Exploration of Consumers' Perceived Impacts, Behavioural Reactions, and Future Reflections of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2017) as Applied to Electronic Cigarettes.","authors":"Emma Ward, Claudia Anholt, Sarah Gentry, Lynne Dawkins, Richard Holland, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1177/1179173X20925458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electronic cigarette regulations included in the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), Article 20, implemented in Europe by May 2017, aimed to improve safety for e-cigarette consumers, and prevent uptake among non-smokers, particularly young people. Before implementation, there were significant concerns from consumers, industry, and some in the scientific community about the potential negative impact of the TPD on people using e-cigarettes to remain abstinent from smoking. To date, there is limited evidence on how the TPD has affected consumers. This study aimed to add insight into how consumers perceived and experienced the regulations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative data, collected between March 2018 and March 2019, relating to participant views of the TPD were extracted from 160 interviews/extended surveys of e-cigarette consumers as part of a wider study into e-cigarette use trajectories (ECtra study). Data were thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Awareness of the TPD among consumers was not universal. Participants' smoking behaviour did not appear to be influenced by the legislation. Participants were reassured by manufacturing regulations and requirements for ingredients labels. Participants responded negatively to changes perceived to cause inconvenience and extra plastic waste. The product restrictions prompted some participants to purchase non-compliant products illegally, potentially putting their safety at risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-cigarette regulation should focus on ensuring product safety. Raising awareness of the TPD among consumers and smokers could be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"13 ","pages":"1179173X20925458"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X20925458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electronic cigarette regulations included in the Tobacco Products Directive (TPD), Article 20, implemented in Europe by May 2017, aimed to improve safety for e-cigarette consumers, and prevent uptake among non-smokers, particularly young people. Before implementation, there were significant concerns from consumers, industry, and some in the scientific community about the potential negative impact of the TPD on people using e-cigarettes to remain abstinent from smoking. To date, there is limited evidence on how the TPD has affected consumers. This study aimed to add insight into how consumers perceived and experienced the regulations.

Methods: Qualitative data, collected between March 2018 and March 2019, relating to participant views of the TPD were extracted from 160 interviews/extended surveys of e-cigarette consumers as part of a wider study into e-cigarette use trajectories (ECtra study). Data were thematically analysed.

Results: Awareness of the TPD among consumers was not universal. Participants' smoking behaviour did not appear to be influenced by the legislation. Participants were reassured by manufacturing regulations and requirements for ingredients labels. Participants responded negatively to changes perceived to cause inconvenience and extra plastic waste. The product restrictions prompted some participants to purchase non-compliant products illegally, potentially putting their safety at risk.

Conclusions: E-cigarette regulation should focus on ensuring product safety. Raising awareness of the TPD among consumers and smokers could be beneficial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

消费者对欧盟烟草制品指令(2017 年)应用于电子烟的认知影响、行为反应和未来思考的定性探索。
背景:烟草制品指令》(TPD)第20条中的电子烟法规于2017年5月在欧洲实施,旨在提高电子烟消费者的安全性,防止非吸烟者尤其是年轻人吸食电子烟。在实施之前,消费者、行业和一些科学界人士对 TPD 可能对使用电子烟戒烟的人产生的负面影响表示严重关切。迄今为止,关于《贸易保护指令》如何影响消费者的证据还很有限。本研究旨在深入了解消费者如何看待和体验该法规:在2018年3月至2019年3月期间收集的定性数据与参与者对TPD的看法有关,这些数据是从160份电子烟消费者访谈/扩展调查中提取的,是更广泛的电子烟使用轨迹研究(ECtra研究)的一部分。对数据进行了主题分析:结果:消费者对贸易政策文件的认识并不普遍。参与者的吸烟行为似乎并未受到该法规的影响。生产法规和成分标签要求让参与者感到放心。参与者对被认为会造成不便和额外塑料垃圾的变化反应消极。产品限制促使一些参与者非法购买不符合要求的产品,可能会危及他们的安全:电子烟监管应侧重于确保产品安全。提高消费者和吸烟者对《贸易政策指令》的认识可能会有所裨益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信