Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Carlina Deflorin, Erich Hohenauer, Rahel Stoop, Ulrike van Daele, Ron Clijsen, Jan Taeymans
{"title":"Physical Management of Scar Tissue: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Carlina Deflorin,&nbsp;Erich Hohenauer,&nbsp;Rahel Stoop,&nbsp;Ulrike van Daele,&nbsp;Ron Clijsen,&nbsp;Jan Taeymans","doi":"10.1089/acm.2020.0109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Systematic review and meta-analysis. <b><i>Subjects:</i></b> Adults with any kind of scar tissue. <b><i>Interventions:</i></b> Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. <b><i>Outcome measures:</i></b> Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (<i>p</i> = 0.012), pruritus (<i>p</i> < 0.001), pigmentation (<i>p</i> = 0.010), pliability (<i>p</i> < 0.001), surface area (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and thickness (<i>p</i> = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.</p>","PeriodicalId":520659,"journal":{"name":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","volume":" ","pages":"854-865"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/acm.2020.0109","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2020.0109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to describe the status on the effects of physical scar treatments on pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, scar thickening, and surface area. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Subjects: Adults with any kind of scar tissue. Interventions: Physical scar management versus control or no scar management. Outcome measures: Pain, pigmentation, pliability, pruritus, surface area, scar thickness. Results: The overall results revealed that physical scar management is beneficial compared with the control treatment regarding the management of pain (p = 0.012), pruritus (p < 0.001), pigmentation (p = 0.010), pliability (p < 0.001), surface area (p < 0.001), and thickness (p = 0.022) of scar tissue in adults. The observed risk of bias was high for blinding of participants and personnel (47%) and low for other bias (100%). Conclusions: Physical scar management demonstrates moderate-to-strong effects on improvement of scar issues as related to signs and symptoms. These results show the importance of specific physical management of scar tissue.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

疤痕组织的物理管理:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述荟萃分析的目的是描述物理疤痕治疗对疼痛、色素沉着、柔韧性、瘙痒、疤痕增厚和表面积的影响。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。受试者:有任何疤痕组织的成年人。干预措施:物理疤痕管理与控制或无疤痕管理。结果测量:疼痛、色素沉着、柔韧性、瘙痒、表面面积、疤痕厚度。结果:总体结果显示,在成人瘢痕组织的疼痛(p = 0.012)、瘙痒(p = 0.010)和柔韧性(p = 0.022)方面,物理疤痕处理比对照治疗更有利。观察到的偏倚风险在参与者和人员的盲法中较高(47%),在其他偏倚中较低(100%)。结论:物理疤痕管理显示中等到强烈的效果,改善疤痕问题相关的体征和症状。这些结果显示了疤痕组织的特殊物理管理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信