A randomized, prospective, comparative trial of a variable-angle versus fixed-angle endoscope for exploratory thoracoscopy in canine cadavers.

Veterinary surgery : VS Pub Date : 2021-07-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-23 DOI:10.1111/vsu.13449
Danielle M Diamond, Valery F Scharf, King Wa Chiu, Jonathan A Hash, Kyle G Mathews
{"title":"A randomized, prospective, comparative trial of a variable-angle versus fixed-angle endoscope for exploratory thoracoscopy in canine cadavers.","authors":"Danielle M Diamond,&nbsp;Valery F Scharf,&nbsp;King Wa Chiu,&nbsp;Jonathan A Hash,&nbsp;Kyle G Mathews","doi":"10.1111/vsu.13449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of a variable-angle endoscope (VAE) for canine thoracoscopic exploration to a traditional fixed-angle endoscope (FAE).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized, prospective, comparative study.</p><p><strong>Sample population: </strong>Five fresh canine cadavers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve predetermined anatomical locations were labeled after median sternotomy in each cadaveric thorax. Two board-certified veterinary surgeons performed thoracoscopic evaluation of each thorax using a fixed-angle (30°) and a variable-angle (0°-120°) endoscope with and without lungs mechanically ventilated. The order of surgeon, lung ventilation, and endoscope were determined using a randomized block design. Time to visualize each anatomical location was compared for surgeon, endoscope, and lung ventilation status. Primary outcome measures were time to individual anatomical location, total simulated thoracoscopic exploration time, and ability to identify anatomical location within the designated time period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lung ventilation (difference = 184 seconds, P = .015, 95% CI = 45-342 seconds) and endoscope type (difference = 112 seconds, P = .029; 95% CI = 10-213 seconds) had an effect on the cumulative time for complete thoracoscopic exploration. The VAE shortened the time to identify three of the 12 anatomical locations when controlling for the effects of lung ventilation. Use of the VAE did not improve time to identification for any locations compared to the FAE when lungs were not ventilated. The VAE facilitated significantly shorter cumulative thoracoscopic exploration time compared with the FAE. Failure to identify predetermined locations was more common with the FAE than with the VAE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a rigid VAE decreased cumulative thoracoscopic exploration time and provided an alternative to one-lung ventilation for circumventing the visual impediments of lung ventilation.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This cadaveric study provides evidence that one-lung ventilation and use of a VAE may improve surgeon efficiency during exploratory thoracoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":123280,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary surgery : VS","volume":" ","pages":"O17-O25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/vsu.13449","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary surgery : VS","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.13449","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of a variable-angle endoscope (VAE) for canine thoracoscopic exploration to a traditional fixed-angle endoscope (FAE).

Study design: Randomized, prospective, comparative study.

Sample population: Five fresh canine cadavers.

Methods: Twelve predetermined anatomical locations were labeled after median sternotomy in each cadaveric thorax. Two board-certified veterinary surgeons performed thoracoscopic evaluation of each thorax using a fixed-angle (30°) and a variable-angle (0°-120°) endoscope with and without lungs mechanically ventilated. The order of surgeon, lung ventilation, and endoscope were determined using a randomized block design. Time to visualize each anatomical location was compared for surgeon, endoscope, and lung ventilation status. Primary outcome measures were time to individual anatomical location, total simulated thoracoscopic exploration time, and ability to identify anatomical location within the designated time period.

Results: Lung ventilation (difference = 184 seconds, P = .015, 95% CI = 45-342 seconds) and endoscope type (difference = 112 seconds, P = .029; 95% CI = 10-213 seconds) had an effect on the cumulative time for complete thoracoscopic exploration. The VAE shortened the time to identify three of the 12 anatomical locations when controlling for the effects of lung ventilation. Use of the VAE did not improve time to identification for any locations compared to the FAE when lungs were not ventilated. The VAE facilitated significantly shorter cumulative thoracoscopic exploration time compared with the FAE. Failure to identify predetermined locations was more common with the FAE than with the VAE.

Conclusion: Use of a rigid VAE decreased cumulative thoracoscopic exploration time and provided an alternative to one-lung ventilation for circumventing the visual impediments of lung ventilation.

Clinical significance: This cadaveric study provides evidence that one-lung ventilation and use of a VAE may improve surgeon efficiency during exploratory thoracoscopy.

一项随机、前瞻性、可变角度内窥镜与固定角度内窥镜在犬尸体胸腔镜探查中的比较试验。
目的:比较可变角度内窥镜(VAE)与传统固定角度内窥镜(FAE)在犬胸腔镜探查中的应用效果。研究设计:随机、前瞻性、比较研究。样本人群:五具新鲜的犬类尸体。方法:胸骨正中切开术后,在每条尸体胸上标记12个预定解剖位置。两名经委员会认证的兽医使用固定角度(30°)和可变角度(0°-120°)内窥镜对每个胸腔进行胸腔镜评估,有无肺机械通气。采用随机分组设计确定手术顺序、肺通气和内窥镜。比较外科医生、内窥镜和肺通气状态对每个解剖位置的可视化时间。主要观察指标为到达个体解剖位置的时间、模拟胸腔镜探查总时间以及在指定时间段内识别解剖位置的能力。结果:肺通气(差值184秒,P =。015, 95% CI = 45-342秒)和内窥镜类型(差异= 112秒,P = 0.029;95% CI = 10-213秒)对完成胸腔镜探查的累积时间有影响。在控制肺通气影响的情况下,VAE缩短了识别12个解剖位置中的3个的时间。与肺不通气时的FAE相比,使用VAE并没有缩短识别任何位置的时间。与FAE相比,VAE显著缩短了胸腔镜累计探查时间。与VAE相比,FAE更容易无法确定预定的位置。结论:刚性VAE的使用减少了胸腔镜的累计探查时间,为避免肺部通气的视觉障碍提供了一种替代单肺通气的方法。临床意义:这项尸体研究提供了单肺通气和使用VAE可以提高胸腔镜探查手术效率的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信