Efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Q1 Medicine
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 Epub Date: 2020-06-22 DOI:10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6
Dechao Feng, Fan Zhang, Shengzhuo Liu, Ping Han, Wuran Wei
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of the tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss and transfusion requirements during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Dechao Feng,&nbsp;Fan Zhang,&nbsp;Shengzhuo Liu,&nbsp;Ping Han,&nbsp;Wuran Wei","doi":"10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive approach used for large kidney stones. Although tranexamic acid (TA) has the property of reducing perioperative bleeding, the effect of this drug on PCNL is equivocal. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of TA in preventing hemorrhagic complications, transfusion requirements and other perioperative outcomes during PCNL with available randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the literature according to Cochrane guidelines for studies comparing TA and normal saline. All studies reporting the outcomes of interest were included. The data analysis was completed using the Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.3.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Data from three RCTs on 570 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Patients receiving TA experienced less blood loss (MD: -0.82; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.40; P=0.0001), fewer transfusion requirements (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.01-0.76; P=0.005), lower minor complication rate (OR:0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80, P=0.003), fewer major complication rate (OR:0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.88, p=0.03), shorter operative time (SMD: -0.39; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.02; P=0.04) and less length of stay (LOS) (SMD: -0.68; 95% CI: -1.01 to -0.35; P<0.0001) than their counterparts during PCNL with statistically significant P value and no significant between-study heterogeneity except for LOS and operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our work assessing the use of TA in the clinical management of patients undergoing PCNL indicated promising results. Further well-designed trials are warranted to determine the optimal dose and indications of this drug in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49015,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.20.03826-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Introduction: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive approach used for large kidney stones. Although tranexamic acid (TA) has the property of reducing perioperative bleeding, the effect of this drug on PCNL is equivocal. This meta-analysis was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of TA in preventing hemorrhagic complications, transfusion requirements and other perioperative outcomes during PCNL with available randomized-controlled trials (RCTs).

Evidence acquisition: We performed a systematic review of the literature according to Cochrane guidelines for studies comparing TA and normal saline. All studies reporting the outcomes of interest were included. The data analysis was completed using the Cochrane Collaboration's software RevMan 5.3.

Evidence synthesis: Data from three RCTs on 570 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Patients receiving TA experienced less blood loss (MD: -0.82; 95% CI: -1.24 to -0.40; P=0.0001), fewer transfusion requirements (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.01-0.76; P=0.005), lower minor complication rate (OR:0.51, 95% CI: 0.32-0.80, P=0.003), fewer major complication rate (OR:0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.88, p=0.03), shorter operative time (SMD: -0.39; 95% CI: -0.75 to -0.02; P=0.04) and less length of stay (LOS) (SMD: -0.68; 95% CI: -1.01 to -0.35; P<0.0001) than their counterparts during PCNL with statistically significant P value and no significant between-study heterogeneity except for LOS and operative time.

Conclusions: Our work assessing the use of TA in the clinical management of patients undergoing PCNL indicated promising results. Further well-designed trials are warranted to determine the optimal dose and indications of this drug in practice.

氨甲环酸在经皮肾镜取石术中减少失血量和输血需求的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
导读:经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)是一种微创治疗大肾结石的方法。虽然氨甲环酸(TA)具有减少围手术期出血的特性,但该药对PCNL的作用尚不明确。本荟萃分析旨在通过现有的随机对照试验(RCTs)确定TA在预防PCNL期间出血并发症、输血需求和其他围手术期结局方面的有效性和安全性。证据获取:我们根据Cochrane指南对比较TA和生理盐水的研究进行了系统的文献回顾。所有报告相关结果的研究均被纳入。数据分析使用Cochrane协作软件RevMan 5.3完成。证据综合:来自570例患者的3项随机对照试验的数据被纳入最终的荟萃分析。接受TA治疗的患者失血量较少(MD: -0.82;95% CI: -1.24 ~ -0.40;P=0.0001),输血需求减少(OR: 0.40;95% ci: 0.01-0.76;P=0.005),较低的次要并发症发生率(OR:0.51, 95% CI: 0.32 ~ 0.80, P=0.003),较低的主要并发症发生率(OR:0.31, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 0.88, P= 0.03),较短的手术时间(SMD: -0.39;95% CI: -0.75 ~ -0.02;P=0.04)和更短的住院时间(LOS) (SMD: -0.68;95% CI: -1.01 ~ -0.35;结论:我们的工作评估了TA在PCNL患者临床管理中的应用,结果令人鼓舞。进一步精心设计的试验是必要的,以确定最佳剂量和适应症的药物在实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica
Minerva Urologica E Nefrologica UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Minerva Urologica e Nefrologica publishes scientific papers on nephrology and urology. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of Minerva opinion editorials, editorial comments, original articles, video illustrated articles, review articles and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信