Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Excision Using a Vascular Stapler.

Q3 Medicine
Ji Hyeon Park, Suk Ho Sohn, Jae Woong Choi, Eun Ah Park, Ho Young Hwang
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Left Atrial Appendage Excision Using a Vascular Stapler.","authors":"Ji Hyeon Park,&nbsp;Suk Ho Sohn,&nbsp;Jae Woong Choi,&nbsp;Eun Ah Park,&nbsp;Ho Young Hwang","doi":"10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.3.127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage (LAA) excision using a vascular stapler.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty consecutive patients (mean age, 68±9 years) who underwent LAA excision using a vascular stapler during concomitant cardiac surgery were enrolled. In all patients, the excision site was evaluated using computed tomography at a median of 7 days (interquartile range, 5-13.3 days) postoperatively. The safety endpoint of this study was the occurrence of LAA excision-related events, which were defined as bleeding from the excision site that required reinforcement sutures or reoperation due to excision site bleeding. The efficacy endpoint was LAA excision failure, which was defined as a remnant LAA (a stump >1 cm in maximum length) or extravasation of radiocontrast dye.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LAAs were excised using 60- and 45-mm vascular staplers in 49 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Reinforcement sutures were needed in 4 patients due to staple-line bleeding and in 4 patients due to bleeding of the surrounding tissues. No patient underwent reoperation due to staple-related bleeding. A remnant LAA was observed in 2 patients, while extravasation of radiocontrast dye was not observed in any patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LAA excision using a vascular stapler may be an effective technique for LAA exclusion. Delicate handling of the stapler device and LA tissue is required to prevent procedure-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":38678,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"53 3","pages":"127-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f7/3d/KJTCV-53-127.PMC7287222.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.3.127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage (LAA) excision using a vascular stapler.

Methods: Fifty consecutive patients (mean age, 68±9 years) who underwent LAA excision using a vascular stapler during concomitant cardiac surgery were enrolled. In all patients, the excision site was evaluated using computed tomography at a median of 7 days (interquartile range, 5-13.3 days) postoperatively. The safety endpoint of this study was the occurrence of LAA excision-related events, which were defined as bleeding from the excision site that required reinforcement sutures or reoperation due to excision site bleeding. The efficacy endpoint was LAA excision failure, which was defined as a remnant LAA (a stump >1 cm in maximum length) or extravasation of radiocontrast dye.

Results: LAAs were excised using 60- and 45-mm vascular staplers in 49 patients and 1 patient, respectively. Reinforcement sutures were needed in 4 patients due to staple-line bleeding and in 4 patients due to bleeding of the surrounding tissues. No patient underwent reoperation due to staple-related bleeding. A remnant LAA was observed in 2 patients, while extravasation of radiocontrast dye was not observed in any patients.

Conclusion: LAA excision using a vascular stapler may be an effective technique for LAA exclusion. Delicate handling of the stapler device and LA tissue is required to prevent procedure-related complications.

Abstract Image

血管吻合器左心耳切除的安全性和有效性。
背景:本研究旨在评价血管吻合器切除左心耳(LAA)的安全性和有效性。方法:连续50例患者(平均年龄68±9岁)在合并心脏手术中使用血管吻合器切除LAA。在所有患者中,术后中位数为7天(四分位数间距为5-13.3天),使用计算机断层扫描评估切除部位。本研究的安全终点是LAA切除相关事件的发生,其定义为切除部位出血,需要加固缝合线或因切除部位出血而再次手术。疗效终点为LAA切除失败,定义为LAA残余(最大长度> 1cm)或造影剂外渗。结果:应用60 mm血管吻合器和45 mm血管吻合器分别切除49例和1例LAAs。4例患者因钉线出血,4例患者因周围组织出血而需要加固缝合。无患者因镫骨相关出血再次手术。2例可见残留LAA,未见造影剂外渗。结论:血管吻合器切除LAA是一种有效的LAA排除技术。需要小心处理订书机装置和LA组织,以防止手术相关的并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信