A Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Nursing Home to Emergency Department Care Transitions.

Cameron J Gettel, Nathan Pertsch, Elizabeth M Goldberg
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Interventions to Improve Nursing Home to Emergency Department Care Transitions.","authors":"Cameron J Gettel,&nbsp;Nathan Pertsch,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Goldberg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to identify interventions that are effective in improving the transitions of care for patients from nursing homes (NHs) to emergency departments (EDs). A total of 607 studies were identified, from which 19 studies were included for full-text review. Nine pre-post intervention studies and two retrospective cohort studies met all criteria for inclusion. In the quality assessment, two (18.2%) were assessed as good quality; seven (63.6%) were fair; and two (18.2%) were poor. Nine studies (81.2%) had a severe risk of bias, primarily due to confounding and deviation from the intended intervention. Pre-post intervention studies utilized transfer checklists/forms, web-based communication networks, and multimodal approaches to improve transitions of care. Eight studies reported significant improvement in critical NH-ED transfer information completeness after intervention implementation. Three studies assessed health care utilization after intervention implementation with two studies reporting no reduction in utilization and one study reporting decreased 30-day hospital readmission and ED revisit rates. Studies evaluating patient-centered outcomes, such as whether interventions reduced harm to patients by decreasing medical errors, hospital length of stay, or the overall number of facility transfers, are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":87367,"journal":{"name":"The annals of long-term care : the official journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7295263/pdf/nihms-1557210.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The annals of long-term care : the official journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify interventions that are effective in improving the transitions of care for patients from nursing homes (NHs) to emergency departments (EDs). A total of 607 studies were identified, from which 19 studies were included for full-text review. Nine pre-post intervention studies and two retrospective cohort studies met all criteria for inclusion. In the quality assessment, two (18.2%) were assessed as good quality; seven (63.6%) were fair; and two (18.2%) were poor. Nine studies (81.2%) had a severe risk of bias, primarily due to confounding and deviation from the intended intervention. Pre-post intervention studies utilized transfer checklists/forms, web-based communication networks, and multimodal approaches to improve transitions of care. Eight studies reported significant improvement in critical NH-ED transfer information completeness after intervention implementation. Three studies assessed health care utilization after intervention implementation with two studies reporting no reduction in utilization and one study reporting decreased 30-day hospital readmission and ED revisit rates. Studies evaluating patient-centered outcomes, such as whether interventions reduced harm to patients by decreasing medical errors, hospital length of stay, or the overall number of facility transfers, are needed.

改善养老院到急诊科护理过渡的干预措施系统回顾。
本研究旨在确定有效的干预措施,以改善患者从疗养院(NHs)到急诊科(EDs)的护理过渡。共纳入607项研究,其中19项研究纳入全文综述。9项干预前后研究和2项回顾性队列研究符合所有纳入标准。在质量评价中,2例(18.2%)为良好;7个(63.6%)是公平的;2人(18.2%)生活贫困。9项研究(81.2%)存在严重的偏倚风险,主要是由于混淆和偏离预期的干预措施。干预前后研究利用转移清单/表格、基于网络的沟通网络和多模式方法来改善护理的转移。八项研究报告了干预实施后关键NH-ED传递信息完整性的显著改善。三项研究评估了实施干预措施后的医疗保健利用情况,其中两项研究报告没有减少利用,一项研究报告减少了30天住院再入院率和急诊重访率。评估以患者为中心的结果的研究是必要的,例如干预措施是否通过减少医疗差错、住院时间或设施转移的总次数来减少对患者的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信