Acute effects of MDMA on trust, cooperative behaviour and empathy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment.

Anna Borissova, Bart Ferguson, Matthew B Wall, Celia Ja Morgan, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Mark Bolstridge, Michael Ap Bloomfield, Tim M Williams, Amanda Feilding, Kevin Murphy, Robin J Tyacke, David Erritzoe, Lorna Stewart, Kim Wolff, David Nutt, H Valerie Curran, Will Lawn
{"title":"Acute effects of MDMA on trust, cooperative behaviour and empathy: A double-blind, placebo-controlled experiment.","authors":"Anna Borissova, Bart Ferguson, Matthew B Wall, Celia Ja Morgan, Robin L Carhart-Harris, Mark Bolstridge, Michael Ap Bloomfield, Tim M Williams, Amanda Feilding, Kevin Murphy, Robin J Tyacke, David Erritzoe, Lorna Stewart, Kim Wolff, David Nutt, H Valerie Curran, Will Lawn","doi":"10.1177/0269881120926673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is being actively researched as an adjunct to psychotherapy. It may be beneficial to trust, empathy and cooperative behaviour due to its acute prosocial effects. Aim: To test (a) the acute effects of MDMA on measures of empathy, trust and cooperative behaviour, and (b) subacute changes in mood three days after MDMA administration. Methods: Twenty-five participants (n=7 female), participated in this double-blind, repeated-measures, placebo-controlled experiment. Participants attended two acute sessions, one week apart. Each acute session was followed by a subacute session three days later. Participants received placebo (100 mg ascorbic acid) during one acute session, and MDMA (100 mg MDMA-HCl) at the other, with order counterbalanced. Participants completed the following tasks assessing prosocial behaviour: a trust investment task, a trustworthy face rating task, an empathic stories task, a public project game, a dictator game and an ultimatum game. Participants reported subjective effects. Blood was taken pre-drug, 2 and 4 hours post-drug, and tested for plasma MDMA levels. Results: MDMA acutely increased self-reported ‘closeness to others’ and ‘euphoria’ and increased plasma concentrations of MDMA. MDMA did not significantly change task-based empathy, trust or cooperative behaviour. Using Bayesian analyses, we found evidence that MDMA and placebo did not differ in their effects on empathy and cooperative behaviour. MDMA did not significantly change subacute mood and this was supported by our Bayesian analyses. Conclusion: Despite augmentation in plasma MDMA levels and subjective drug effects, we found no increase in prosocial behaviour in a laboratory setting.","PeriodicalId":156490,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","volume":" ","pages":"547-555"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0269881120926673","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0269881120926673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/6/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Background: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is being actively researched as an adjunct to psychotherapy. It may be beneficial to trust, empathy and cooperative behaviour due to its acute prosocial effects. Aim: To test (a) the acute effects of MDMA on measures of empathy, trust and cooperative behaviour, and (b) subacute changes in mood three days after MDMA administration. Methods: Twenty-five participants (n=7 female), participated in this double-blind, repeated-measures, placebo-controlled experiment. Participants attended two acute sessions, one week apart. Each acute session was followed by a subacute session three days later. Participants received placebo (100 mg ascorbic acid) during one acute session, and MDMA (100 mg MDMA-HCl) at the other, with order counterbalanced. Participants completed the following tasks assessing prosocial behaviour: a trust investment task, a trustworthy face rating task, an empathic stories task, a public project game, a dictator game and an ultimatum game. Participants reported subjective effects. Blood was taken pre-drug, 2 and 4 hours post-drug, and tested for plasma MDMA levels. Results: MDMA acutely increased self-reported ‘closeness to others’ and ‘euphoria’ and increased plasma concentrations of MDMA. MDMA did not significantly change task-based empathy, trust or cooperative behaviour. Using Bayesian analyses, we found evidence that MDMA and placebo did not differ in their effects on empathy and cooperative behaviour. MDMA did not significantly change subacute mood and this was supported by our Bayesian analyses. Conclusion: Despite augmentation in plasma MDMA levels and subjective drug effects, we found no increase in prosocial behaviour in a laboratory setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

MDMA对信任、合作行为和共情的急性影响:一项双盲、安慰剂对照实验。
背景:3,4-亚甲基二氧基甲基苯丙胺(MDMA)作为心理治疗的辅助药物正在被积极研究。由于其强烈的亲社会效应,它可能有利于信任、共情和合作行为。目的:测试(a) MDMA对共情、信任和合作行为的急性影响,以及(b) MDMA给药3天后情绪的亚急性变化。方法:25名受试者(7名女性)参加了双盲、重复测量、安慰剂对照实验。参与者参加了两次急性期,间隔一周。每一次急性期在三天后进行一次亚急性期。参与者在一个急性期接受安慰剂(100毫克抗坏血酸),在另一个急性期接受MDMA(100毫克MDMA- hcl),顺序平衡。参与者完成了以下评估亲社会行为的任务:信任投资任务、可信赖面孔评级任务、移情故事任务、公共项目游戏、独裁者游戏和最后通牒游戏。参与者报告了主观影响。分别于用药前、用药后2、4小时采血,检测血浆MDMA水平。结果:MDMA急剧增加了自我报告的“与他人亲近”和“欣快感”,并增加了MDMA的血浆浓度。MDMA对任务型共情、信任和合作行为没有显著影响。通过贝叶斯分析,我们发现MDMA和安慰剂对共情和合作行为的影响没有差异。MDMA并没有显著改变亚急性情绪,我们的贝叶斯分析也支持这一点。结论:尽管血浆MDMA水平和主观药物效应增加,但我们发现在实验室环境中亲社会行为没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信