The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging.

Eye and vision (London, England) Pub Date : 2020-06-09 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0
Yune Zhao, Ding Chen, Giacomo Savini, Qing Wang, Hongfang Zhang, Yili Jin, Benhao Song, Rui Ning, Jinhai Huang, Chenyang Mei
{"title":"The precision and agreement of corneal thickness and keratometry measurements with SS-OCT versus Scheimpflug imaging.","authors":"Yune Zhao,&nbsp;Ding Chen,&nbsp;Giacomo Savini,&nbsp;Qing Wang,&nbsp;Hongfang Zhang,&nbsp;Yili Jin,&nbsp;Benhao Song,&nbsp;Rui Ning,&nbsp;Jinhai Huang,&nbsp;Chenyang Mei","doi":"10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and Scheimpflug system and evaluate the agreement between the two systems in measuring multiple corneal regions in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pachymetric and keratometric maps for both systems were evaluated. Central, midperipheral and peripheral corneal thickness (CT), keratometry and astigmatism power vectors were recorded. The three outcomes yielded by the same observer were used to assess intraobserver repeatability. The differences in the mean values provided by each observer were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility. Within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability (TRT) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to analyze the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. Paired T-test and Bland-Altman were used to appraise interdevice agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-eight eyes of 78 children were included. The CoV was ≤2.12 and 1.10%, respectively, for repeatability and reproducibility. TRT and CoV were lower for central and paracentral CT measurements than for peripheral measurements. The SS-OCT device generated higher precision when acquiring CT data, whereas Scheimpflug system showed higher reliability when measuring corneal keratometry. Although the CT readings measured using SS-OCT were significantly thinner than Scheimpflug device (<i>P</i> <  0.001), the central and thinnest CT values were still of high agreement. The interdevice agreement of keratometry measurement was high for the central corneal region and moderate for the paracentral and peripheral areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The precision of CT measurements by SS-OCT was higher, while the reliability of keratometry measurements by the Scheimpflug system was higher in children. Apart from the measured values in the central corneal region, the thickness and keratometry readings should not be considered interchangeable between the two systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":520624,"journal":{"name":"Eye and vision (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye and vision (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00197-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the repeatability and reproducibility of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and Scheimpflug system and evaluate the agreement between the two systems in measuring multiple corneal regions in children.

Methods: Pachymetric and keratometric maps for both systems were evaluated. Central, midperipheral and peripheral corneal thickness (CT), keratometry and astigmatism power vectors were recorded. The three outcomes yielded by the same observer were used to assess intraobserver repeatability. The differences in the mean values provided by each observer were used to evaluate interobserver reproducibility. Within-subject standard deviation, test-retest repeatability (TRT) and coefficient of variation (CoV) were used to analyze the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility. Paired T-test and Bland-Altman were used to appraise interdevice agreement.

Results: Seventy-eight eyes of 78 children were included. The CoV was ≤2.12 and 1.10%, respectively, for repeatability and reproducibility. TRT and CoV were lower for central and paracentral CT measurements than for peripheral measurements. The SS-OCT device generated higher precision when acquiring CT data, whereas Scheimpflug system showed higher reliability when measuring corneal keratometry. Although the CT readings measured using SS-OCT were significantly thinner than Scheimpflug device (P <  0.001), the central and thinnest CT values were still of high agreement. The interdevice agreement of keratometry measurement was high for the central corneal region and moderate for the paracentral and peripheral areas.

Conclusions: The precision of CT measurements by SS-OCT was higher, while the reliability of keratometry measurements by the Scheimpflug system was higher in children. Apart from the measured values in the central corneal region, the thickness and keratometry readings should not be considered interchangeable between the two systems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

SS-OCT与Scheimpflug成像对角膜厚度和角膜测量的精确性和一致性。
目的:评估扫描源光学相干断层扫描(SS-OCT)和Scheimpflug系统的重复性和再现性,并评估两种系统在测量儿童多个角膜区域时的一致性。方法:对两种系统的角膜测厚图和角膜测厚图进行评价。记录角膜中央、中外周和外周厚度(CT)、角膜屈光度和散光功率向量。使用同一观察者产生的三个结果来评估观察者内部的可重复性。每个观察者提供的平均值的差异被用来评估观察者之间的可重复性。采用受试者内标准差、重测重复性(TRT)和变异系数(CoV)分析观察者内重复性和观察者间重复性。采用配对t检验和Bland-Altman评价设备间一致性。结果:纳入78例患儿78只眼。冠状病毒的重复性和再现性分别≤2.12%和1.10%。中心和中心旁CT测量的TRT和CoV低于周围测量。SS-OCT设备在获取CT数据时具有更高的精度,而Scheimpflug系统在测量角膜度数时具有更高的可靠性。结论:SS-OCT的CT测量精度更高,而Scheimpflug系统对儿童的角膜曲率测量的可靠性更高。除了在中央角膜区域的测量值,厚度和角膜测量读数不应该被认为是可互换的两个系统之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信