Measuring accuracy of plethysmography based respiratory rate measurement using pulse oximeter at a tertiary hospital in India.

IF 8.5 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumonia Pub Date : 2020-06-05 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s41479-020-00067-2
Varun Alwadhi, Enisha Sarin, Praveen Kumar, Prasant Saboth, Ajay Khera, Sachin Gupta, Harish Kumar
{"title":"Measuring accuracy of plethysmography based respiratory rate measurement using pulse oximeter at a tertiary hospital in India.","authors":"Varun Alwadhi,&nbsp;Enisha Sarin,&nbsp;Praveen Kumar,&nbsp;Prasant Saboth,&nbsp;Ajay Khera,&nbsp;Sachin Gupta,&nbsp;Harish Kumar","doi":"10.1186/s41479-020-00067-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Childhood pneumonia continues to be a major infectious killer in India. WHO recommended respiratory rate and oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) measurements are not well implemented in Indian public health outpatient facilities with the result that treatment decision-making rely on subjective assessments from variably trained and supervised healthcare providers. The introduction of a multi-modal pulse oximeter (POx) that gives reliable measurements would mitigate incorrect diagnosis. In light of future potential use of pulse oximeter in peripheral health centres, it becomes important to measure accuracy of respiratory rate and oxygen saturation of such an instrument. The current study measures accuracy of plethysmography based respiratory rate (RR) using a pulse oximeter (Masimo Rad-G) by comparing it with a gold standard (pediatrician) measurement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A cross sectional study was conducted in the OPD and emergency ward of Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital over a 2 week period wherein a convenience sample of 97 children (2 to 59 months) were assessed by a pediatrician as part of routine assessment alongside independent measure by a consultant using pulse oximeter. The level of agreement between plethymography based RR and pediatrician measure was analyzed along with sensitivity and specificity of fast breathing of plethymography based RR measure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both methods of measurement show strong association (97%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and observed values, falling on line of unity, obtained either from pulse oximeter or by pediatrician are very close to each other. Fast breathing measured by POx has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of nearly 94%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study provides evidence of the accuracy of a plethysmography based RR using a pulse oximeter which can potentially be of use in planning of pneumonia management in public health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45120,"journal":{"name":"Pneumonia","volume":" ","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s41479-020-00067-2","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumonia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41479-020-00067-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Childhood pneumonia continues to be a major infectious killer in India. WHO recommended respiratory rate and oxygen saturation (SpO2) measurements are not well implemented in Indian public health outpatient facilities with the result that treatment decision-making rely on subjective assessments from variably trained and supervised healthcare providers. The introduction of a multi-modal pulse oximeter (POx) that gives reliable measurements would mitigate incorrect diagnosis. In light of future potential use of pulse oximeter in peripheral health centres, it becomes important to measure accuracy of respiratory rate and oxygen saturation of such an instrument. The current study measures accuracy of plethysmography based respiratory rate (RR) using a pulse oximeter (Masimo Rad-G) by comparing it with a gold standard (pediatrician) measurement.

Study design: A cross sectional study was conducted in the OPD and emergency ward of Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital over a 2 week period wherein a convenience sample of 97 children (2 to 59 months) were assessed by a pediatrician as part of routine assessment alongside independent measure by a consultant using pulse oximeter. The level of agreement between plethymography based RR and pediatrician measure was analyzed along with sensitivity and specificity of fast breathing of plethymography based RR measure.

Results: Both methods of measurement show strong association (97%, p < 0.001) and observed values, falling on line of unity, obtained either from pulse oximeter or by pediatrician are very close to each other. Fast breathing measured by POx has a sensitivity of 95% and specificity of nearly 94%.

Conclusion: The current study provides evidence of the accuracy of a plethysmography based RR using a pulse oximeter which can potentially be of use in planning of pneumonia management in public health facilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

印度某三级医院脉搏血氧计测量呼吸率的准确性。
背景:儿童肺炎仍然是印度主要的传染病杀手。世卫组织推荐的呼吸速率和氧饱和度(SpO2)测量在印度公共卫生门诊设施中没有得到很好的实施,结果是治疗决策依赖于受过不同培训和监督的卫生保健提供者的主观评估。多模态脉搏血氧仪(POx)的引入可以提供可靠的测量,从而减少错误的诊断。鉴于脉搏血氧仪未来可能在周边卫生中心使用,测量这种仪器的呼吸速率和氧饱和度的准确性变得非常重要。本研究使用脉搏血氧仪(Masimo Rad-G)与金标准(儿科医生)测量方法进行比较,测量基于体积脉搏图的呼吸率(RR)的准确性。研究设计:在Kalawati Saran儿童医院的OPD和急诊病房进行了一项为期2周的横断面研究,其中由儿科医生评估97名儿童(2至59个月)作为常规评估的一部分,同时由顾问使用脉搏血氧仪进行独立测量。分析基于胸廓图的呼吸频率与儿科医生测量的一致程度,并分析基于胸廓图的呼吸频率测量对快速呼吸的敏感性和特异性。结果:两种测量方法都显示出很强的相关性(97%,p)。结论:目前的研究提供了基于脉搏血氧计的容积脉搏波描记RR准确性的证据,这可能用于公共卫生机构肺炎管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pneumonia
Pneumonia RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
自引率
1.50%
发文量
7
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信