Clinical examination factors that predict delayed recovery in individuals with concussion.

IF 2.1 Q1 REHABILITATION
Archives of physiotherapy Pub Date : 2020-05-26 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s40945-020-00081-z
Corina Martinez, Zachary Christopherson, Ashley Lake, Heather Myers, Jeffrey R Bytomski, Robert J Butler, Chad E Cook
{"title":"Clinical examination factors that predict delayed recovery in individuals with concussion.","authors":"Corina Martinez,&nbsp;Zachary Christopherson,&nbsp;Ashley Lake,&nbsp;Heather Myers,&nbsp;Jeffrey R Bytomski,&nbsp;Robert J Butler,&nbsp;Chad E Cook","doi":"10.1186/s40945-020-00081-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk factors for prolonged recovery after concussion have been well researched, but specific objective clinical examination findings have not. This study examined whether clinical examination results could predict delayed recovery (DR) in individuals with concussion diagnosis. A secondary aim explored the influence of early examination on individual prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a retrospective, observational cohort design that included 163 individuals seen at a concussion clinic who were followed longitudinally until cleared for sports activity. Cognitive, visual, balance, vestibular, and cervical clinical testing and symptom assessment were performed at initial evaluation. DR was calculated by taking the median value associated with time to clearance for activity. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was calculated to determine odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for the odds of DR with presence or absence of each clinical finding. Multivariate analyses were used to define the best predictors of DR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 of 163 individuals were considered delayed in their clearance to activity. Cognitive impairments (OR = 2.72; 95%CI = 1.40, 5.28), visual exam findings (OR = 2.98; 95%CI = 1.31, 6.80), and vestibular exam findings (OR = 4.28; 95%CI = 2.18, 8.43) all increased the odds of a DR. Multivariate modeling retained cognitive symptoms and clinical examination-vestibular testing as predictors of delayed recovery. Time to examination after injury was a mediator for DR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The clinical examination provides value in identifying individuals who are likely to exhibit a delayed clearance. In particular, vestibular impairments identified clinically at initial evaluation and cognitive symptoms were associated with increased odds of a DR to return to activity. Our data support that early implementation of a standardized clinical examination can help to identify individuals who may be more at risk of prolonged recovery from concussion.</p>","PeriodicalId":72290,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physiotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40945-020-00081-z","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40945-020-00081-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Risk factors for prolonged recovery after concussion have been well researched, but specific objective clinical examination findings have not. This study examined whether clinical examination results could predict delayed recovery (DR) in individuals with concussion diagnosis. A secondary aim explored the influence of early examination on individual prognosis.

Methods: The study was a retrospective, observational cohort design that included 163 individuals seen at a concussion clinic who were followed longitudinally until cleared for sports activity. Cognitive, visual, balance, vestibular, and cervical clinical testing and symptom assessment were performed at initial evaluation. DR was calculated by taking the median value associated with time to clearance for activity. Bivariate logistic regression analysis was calculated to determine odds ratios (and 95% confidence intervals) for the odds of DR with presence or absence of each clinical finding. Multivariate analyses were used to define the best predictors of DR.

Results: 80 of 163 individuals were considered delayed in their clearance to activity. Cognitive impairments (OR = 2.72; 95%CI = 1.40, 5.28), visual exam findings (OR = 2.98; 95%CI = 1.31, 6.80), and vestibular exam findings (OR = 4.28; 95%CI = 2.18, 8.43) all increased the odds of a DR. Multivariate modeling retained cognitive symptoms and clinical examination-vestibular testing as predictors of delayed recovery. Time to examination after injury was a mediator for DR.

Conclusions: The clinical examination provides value in identifying individuals who are likely to exhibit a delayed clearance. In particular, vestibular impairments identified clinically at initial evaluation and cognitive symptoms were associated with increased odds of a DR to return to activity. Our data support that early implementation of a standardized clinical examination can help to identify individuals who may be more at risk of prolonged recovery from concussion.

预测脑震荡患者延迟恢复的临床检查因素。
背景:脑震荡后恢复时间延长的危险因素已经得到了很好的研究,但具体客观的临床检查结果还没有。本研究探讨临床检查结果能否预测脑震荡患者的延迟恢复(DR)。第二个目的是探讨早期检查对个体预后的影响。方法:该研究采用回顾性、观察性队列设计,包括163名在脑震荡诊所就诊的患者,他们被纵向随访,直到获准进行体育活动。初步评估时进行认知、视觉、平衡、前庭和颈椎临床检查和症状评估。DR是通过取与清除活动时间相关的中位数来计算的。计算双变量逻辑回归分析,以确定存在或不存在每种临床发现的DR几率的优势比(和95%置信区间)。多变量分析用于确定dr的最佳预测因子。结果:163例患者中有80例被认为是活动清除延迟。认知障碍(OR = 2.72;95%CI = 1.40, 5.28),视觉检查结果(OR = 2.98;95%CI = 1.31, 6.80),前庭检查结果(OR = 4.28;95%CI = 2.18, 8.43)都增加了dr的几率。多变量模型保留了认知症状和临床检查-前庭测试作为延迟恢复的预测因子。结论:临床检查对识别可能出现延迟清除的个体有价值。特别是,在初步评估时临床鉴定的前庭损伤和认知症状与DR恢复活动的几率增加有关。我们的数据支持,早期实施标准化的临床检查可以帮助识别那些可能更有可能从脑震荡中恢复的个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信