Association of Menopausal Age with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology.

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-02-15 DOI:10.1159/000496701
Sushrut Dharmadhikari, Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul, Sudheer Ambekar, Vasu Saini, Diogo C Haussen, Dileep Yavagal
{"title":"Association of Menopausal Age with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysm Morphology.","authors":"Sushrut Dharmadhikari,&nbsp;Kunakorn Atchaneeyasakul,&nbsp;Sudheer Ambekar,&nbsp;Vasu Saini,&nbsp;Diogo C Haussen,&nbsp;Dileep Yavagal","doi":"10.1159/000496701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) increases rapidly in aging women compared with younger women. The impact of menopausal age on UIAs and treatment outcomes with endovascular therapy has not been well studied. We hypothesized that premenopausal age may have a protective effect on presentation size and treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of menopause with UIA size and outcome with endovascular therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of consecutive female patients with UIAs treated with endovascular therapy at our academic tertiary care center. UIA characteristics, complications, and outcomes were recorded and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>117 patients were included: 23 patients in the premenopausal age (PRM) group and 94 in the postmenopausal age (POM) group. 93.6% of all aneurysms in the PRM group were in the internal carotid artery (ICA) segments (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hence only ICA segment aneurysms were further studied. A total of 21 patients in the PRM group and 60 in the POM group were found to have ICA segment aneurysms. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean size of the aneurysms in the PRM group was 8.6 ± 3.9 versus 10.8 ± 5.6 mm in the POM group (<i>p</i> = 0.055). There was a trend to higher aneurysm neck size seen in the POM group (4.7 ± 2.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 mm; <i>p</i> = 0.07). The number of aneurysm lobes was higher in the PRM group (1.23 ± 0.54 vs. 1.07 ± 0.31; <i>p</i> = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, the PRM group had a significantly higher number of UIA lobes. Complications and endovascular therapy outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A trend to increased UIA maximal diameter and neck size was seen in the POM group compared to the PRM group. The PRM group had a significantly higher number of UIA lobes. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496701","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) increases rapidly in aging women compared with younger women. The impact of menopausal age on UIAs and treatment outcomes with endovascular therapy has not been well studied. We hypothesized that premenopausal age may have a protective effect on presentation size and treatment outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the association of menopause with UIA size and outcome with endovascular therapy.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive female patients with UIAs treated with endovascular therapy at our academic tertiary care center. UIA characteristics, complications, and outcomes were recorded and compared.

Results: 117 patients were included: 23 patients in the premenopausal age (PRM) group and 94 in the postmenopausal age (POM) group. 93.6% of all aneurysms in the PRM group were in the internal carotid artery (ICA) segments (p < 0.05). Hence only ICA segment aneurysms were further studied. A total of 21 patients in the PRM group and 60 in the POM group were found to have ICA segment aneurysms. Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The mean size of the aneurysms in the PRM group was 8.6 ± 3.9 versus 10.8 ± 5.6 mm in the POM group (p = 0.055). There was a trend to higher aneurysm neck size seen in the POM group (4.7 ± 2.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.7 mm; p = 0.07). The number of aneurysm lobes was higher in the PRM group (1.23 ± 0.54 vs. 1.07 ± 0.31; p = 0.18). In multivariate analysis, the PRM group had a significantly higher number of UIA lobes. Complications and endovascular therapy outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: A trend to increased UIA maximal diameter and neck size was seen in the POM group compared to the PRM group. The PRM group had a significantly higher number of UIA lobes. Larger prospective trials are needed to confirm these findings.

绝经年龄与未破裂颅内动脉瘤形态的关系。
背景:与年轻女性相比,老年女性未破裂颅内动脉瘤(UIAs)的患病率迅速增加。绝经年龄对UIAs和血管内治疗结果的影响尚未得到很好的研究。我们假设绝经前年龄可能对呈现大小和治疗结果有保护作用。目的:探讨绝经期与UIA大小及血管内治疗效果的关系。方法:回顾性分析我院三级专科医疗中心接受血管内治疗的连续女性UIAs患者。记录并比较UIA的特征、并发症和结果。结果:纳入117例患者:绝经前(PRM)组23例,绝经后(POM)组94例。PRM组动脉瘤发生在颈内动脉段的占93.6% (p < 0.05)。因此,我们只对ICA段动脉瘤进行了进一步的研究。PRM组21例,POM组60例,均发现ICA段动脉瘤。两组患者的基线特征相似。PRM组动脉瘤的平均大小为8.6±3.9 mm,而POM组动脉瘤的平均大小为10.8±5.6 mm (p = 0.055)。POM组动脉瘤颈有增大的趋势(4.7±2.5 vs. 3.7±1.7 mm;P = 0.07)。PRM组动脉瘤叶数较多(1.23±0.54 vs 1.07±0.31);P = 0.18)。在多变量分析中,PRM组有明显更高的UIA叶数。两组患者并发症及血管内治疗结果相似。结论:与PRM组相比,POM组有UIA最大直径和颈部尺寸增加的趋势。PRM组UIA叶数显著增加。需要更大规模的前瞻性试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信