Longer 6-mm Diameter Stent Retrievers Are Effective for Achieving Higher First Pass Success with Fibrin-Rich Clots.

Q1 Medicine
Interventional Neurology Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2019-06-18 DOI:10.1159/000499974
Gaurav Girdhar, Evan Epstein, Kevin Nguyen, Chelsea Gregg, Tejashri Kumar, John Wainwright, Amon Y Liu, Italo Linfante
{"title":"Longer 6-mm Diameter Stent Retrievers Are Effective for Achieving Higher First Pass Success with Fibrin-Rich Clots.","authors":"Gaurav Girdhar,&nbsp;Evan Epstein,&nbsp;Kevin Nguyen,&nbsp;Chelsea Gregg,&nbsp;Tejashri Kumar,&nbsp;John Wainwright,&nbsp;Amon Y Liu,&nbsp;Italo Linfante","doi":"10.1159/000499974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First pass success (FPS) can be defined as in vitro retrieval of clot in a single pass during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite advancements in MT technology, retrieval of fibrin-rich clots remains a challenge. Therefore, the effect of stent retriever length on FPS for fibrin-rich clots was investigated by using Solitaire<sup>TM</sup> 6 × 40 versus 6 × 30 mm devices with a balloon guide catheter (BGC) or distal access catheter (DAC) and sheath, in an in vitro model of anterior circulation neurovascular anatomy. Additionally, vascular safety of the Solitaire<sup>TM</sup> 6 × 40 versus 6 × 30 mm devices was evaluated in a porcine model for differences in: luminal thrombus, inflammation, endothelial coverage, fibrin deposits, smooth muscle cell loss, elastic lamina and adventitia disruption, intimal hyperplasia, and lumen reduction, at 0, 30, and 90 days post-treatment. In vitro overall FPS was measured as: Solitaire<sup>TM</sup> 6 × 40 (95%) and Solitaire<sup>TM</sup> 6 × 30 (67%). FPS for clot location in middle cerebral artery was: (a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 100%; <i>n</i> = 8); (b) DAC with 088 sheath (6 × 40 mm: 83%; 6 × 30 mm: 33%; <i>n</i> = 12). FPS for clot location in internal carotid artery was: (a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 80%; <i>n</i> = 11); (b) DAC with 088 sheath (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 67%; <i>n</i> = 10). Stent length had a significant effect (Fisher's exact test; <i>p</i> < 0.05) on FPS. In vivo evaluation in the porcine model showed no difference in vascular safety parameters between the Solitaire<sup>TM</sup> 6 × 40 and 6 × 30 mm devices (<i>p</i> > 0.05) at all time points in the study. Longer stent retrievers may be safe and effective in improving FPS for fibrin-rich clots in in vitro and in vivo models of LVO.</p>","PeriodicalId":46280,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000499974","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000499974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

First pass success (FPS) can be defined as in vitro retrieval of clot in a single pass during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute large vessel occlusion (LVO). Despite advancements in MT technology, retrieval of fibrin-rich clots remains a challenge. Therefore, the effect of stent retriever length on FPS for fibrin-rich clots was investigated by using SolitaireTM 6 × 40 versus 6 × 30 mm devices with a balloon guide catheter (BGC) or distal access catheter (DAC) and sheath, in an in vitro model of anterior circulation neurovascular anatomy. Additionally, vascular safety of the SolitaireTM 6 × 40 versus 6 × 30 mm devices was evaluated in a porcine model for differences in: luminal thrombus, inflammation, endothelial coverage, fibrin deposits, smooth muscle cell loss, elastic lamina and adventitia disruption, intimal hyperplasia, and lumen reduction, at 0, 30, and 90 days post-treatment. In vitro overall FPS was measured as: SolitaireTM 6 × 40 (95%) and SolitaireTM 6 × 30 (67%). FPS for clot location in middle cerebral artery was: (a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 100%; n = 8); (b) DAC with 088 sheath (6 × 40 mm: 83%; 6 × 30 mm: 33%; n = 12). FPS for clot location in internal carotid artery was: (a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 80%; n = 11); (b) DAC with 088 sheath (6 × 40 mm: 100%; 6 × 30 mm: 67%; n = 10). Stent length had a significant effect (Fisher's exact test; p < 0.05) on FPS. In vivo evaluation in the porcine model showed no difference in vascular safety parameters between the SolitaireTM 6 × 40 and 6 × 30 mm devices (p > 0.05) at all time points in the study. Longer stent retrievers may be safe and effective in improving FPS for fibrin-rich clots in in vitro and in vivo models of LVO.

更长的6mm直径支架回收器对富纤维蛋白凝块获得更高的首次通过成功率是有效的。
首次通过成功(FPS)可以定义为在急性大血管闭塞(LVO)的机械取栓(MT)过程中,单次通过体外取出血栓。尽管MT技术取得了进步,但恢复富含纤维蛋白的凝块仍然是一个挑战。因此,在体外前循环神经血管解剖模型中,采用SolitaireTM 6 × 40与6 × 30 mm带球囊导尿管(BGC)或远端通路导管(DAC)和鞘的支架回收器长度对富含纤维蛋白凝块的FPS的影响进行了研究。此外,在猪模型中评估了SolitaireTM 6 × 40与6 × 30 mm装置在以下方面的安全性差异:治疗后0、30和90天,管腔血栓、炎症、内皮覆盖、纤维蛋白沉积、平滑肌细胞损失、弹性膜和外膜破坏、内膜增生和管腔减少。体外总FPS测定为:SolitaireTM 6 × 40(95%)和SolitaireTM 6 × 30(67%)。脑中动脉血块定位的FPS为:(a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%;6 × 30mm: 100%;N = 8);(b) 088护套DAC (6 × 40mm): 83%;6 × 30mm: 33%;N = 12)。颈内动脉血块定位的FPS为:(a) BGC (6 × 40 mm: 100%;6 × 30mm: 80%;N = 11);(b) 088护套DAC (6 × 40mm: 100%;6 × 30mm: 67%;N = 10)。支架长度有显著影响(Fisher精确检验;p < 0.05)。在猪模型体内评价显示,在研究的所有时间点,SolitaireTM 6 × 40和6 × 30 mm装置的血管安全参数没有差异(p > 0.05)。在体外和体内LVO模型中,较长的支架可安全有效地改善富含纤维蛋白凝块的FPS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neurology
Interventional Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信