An International Survey of Commonly Used Interventions for Management of Pelvic Pain.

Meryl Alappattu, Sandra Hilton, Mark Bishop
{"title":"An International Survey of Commonly Used Interventions for Management of Pelvic Pain.","authors":"Meryl Alappattu,&nbsp;Sandra Hilton,&nbsp;Mark Bishop","doi":"10.1097/jwh.0000000000000131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pelvic pain (PP) is a debilitating condition that is challenging to manage. Despite differences in suspected etiologies of different PP conditions, common clinical signs and symptoms make it appropriate to group these diagnoses. The presence of neuro-musculoskeletal impairments in PP suggests that physical therapists are ideally situated to be included as part of the health care team managing this condition; however, little information is available to guide physical therapist management of PP.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>As a first step to developing management guidelines, we sought to determine common interventions currently used by physical therapists to manage PP.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Descriptive survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi approach was used to identify broad categories of interventions that were then used to build a survey. Purposeful selection with snowball recruiting methods was used to collect responses from practitioners. Frequency data were collected for survey responses. Chi-square analysis determined associations among responses based on practitioner training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 984 responses from 17 different countries were analyzed. The primary responses were from physical therapists in the USA and Canada. The majority of respondents were board-certified clinical specialists. More than 80% of physical therapist respondents indicated that they \"frequently used\" education, exercise, and manual therapy for patients with PP. The most common interventions considered effective but not frequently used were cognitive-behavioral therapy, dry needling, acupuncture, topical medications, and internal pelvic manual therapy techniques. Geographical differences in patterns of usespecific manual therapy and exercise interventions were noted. Differences were also noted on the basis of the levels of advanced postprofessional training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physical therapists routinely use education, manual therapy, and exercise to manage pelvic pain conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"43 2","pages":"82-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000131","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jwh.0000000000000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Pelvic pain (PP) is a debilitating condition that is challenging to manage. Despite differences in suspected etiologies of different PP conditions, common clinical signs and symptoms make it appropriate to group these diagnoses. The presence of neuro-musculoskeletal impairments in PP suggests that physical therapists are ideally situated to be included as part of the health care team managing this condition; however, little information is available to guide physical therapist management of PP.

Objectives: As a first step to developing management guidelines, we sought to determine common interventions currently used by physical therapists to manage PP.

Study design: Descriptive survey.

Methods: A modified Delphi approach was used to identify broad categories of interventions that were then used to build a survey. Purposeful selection with snowball recruiting methods was used to collect responses from practitioners. Frequency data were collected for survey responses. Chi-square analysis determined associations among responses based on practitioner training.

Results: A total of 984 responses from 17 different countries were analyzed. The primary responses were from physical therapists in the USA and Canada. The majority of respondents were board-certified clinical specialists. More than 80% of physical therapist respondents indicated that they "frequently used" education, exercise, and manual therapy for patients with PP. The most common interventions considered effective but not frequently used were cognitive-behavioral therapy, dry needling, acupuncture, topical medications, and internal pelvic manual therapy techniques. Geographical differences in patterns of usespecific manual therapy and exercise interventions were noted. Differences were also noted on the basis of the levels of advanced postprofessional training.

Conclusion: Physical therapists routinely use education, manual therapy, and exercise to manage pelvic pain conditions.

盆腔疼痛治疗常用干预措施的国际调查。
背景:骨盆疼痛(PP)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,具有挑战性。尽管不同PP疾病的疑似病因存在差异,但共同的临床体征和症状使得对这些诊断进行分组是合适的。PP中神经肌肉骨骼损伤的存在表明,物理治疗师是管理这种情况的医疗保健团队的理想人选;然而,很少有信息可以指导物理治疗师管理pp。目的:作为制定管理指南的第一步,我们试图确定物理治疗师目前用于管理pp的常见干预措施。研究设计:描述性调查。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法来确定干预措施的大类,然后用于建立调查。采用滚雪球招募法进行有目的的选择,收集从业人员的反馈。收集频率数据作为调查回应。卡方分析确定了基于从业者培训的反应之间的关联。结果:共分析了来自17个不同国家的984份回复。主要回应来自美国和加拿大的物理治疗师。大多数受访者是委员会认证的临床专家。超过80%的物理治疗师受访者表示,他们“经常使用”教育、锻炼和手工疗法来治疗PP患者。最常见的干预措施被认为是有效的,但不经常使用的是认知行为疗法、干针、针灸、局部药物治疗和盆腔内手工疗法技术。注意到使用特定的手工疗法和运动干预模式的地理差异。在高级专业后培训水平的基础上也注意到差异。结论:物理治疗师通常使用教育、手工治疗和运动来治疗盆腔疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信