Reproductive autonomy and contraceptive use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam

Q2 Medicine
Nghia Nguyen , Jessica Londeree , Linh H Nguyen , Dung H Tran , Maria F. Gallo
{"title":"Reproductive autonomy and contraceptive use among women in Hanoi, Vietnam","authors":"Nghia Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jessica Londeree ,&nbsp;Linh H Nguyen ,&nbsp;Dung H Tran ,&nbsp;Maria F. Gallo","doi":"10.1016/j.conx.2019.100011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Reproductive autonomy (i.e., power to control and decide about contraceptive use, pregnancy and childbearing) could determine a woman’s capacity to use contraception. Although the Reproductive Autonomy Scale was developed to quantitatively assess women’s reproductive autonomy, it has not been validated in any population outside the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional study of reproductive-age, sexually active women in Hanoi, Vietnam, who did not desire pregnancy. We administered a questionnaire containing the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and calculated composite scores of the measure’s three subscales: (1) decision-making power, (2) freedom from coercion and (3) communication ability. To assess internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha score for each subscale. We used logistic regression to evaluate differences in subscale scores between women who did and did not engage in unprotected sex in the past month.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Analysis is based on 500 participants; of these women, 17% (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->85) engaged in unprotected sex in the past month. Subscales had moderate to high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.65–0.87). Mean subscale scores did not vary between women who did and did not engage in recent unprotected sex. Unprotected sex in the past month was not associated with decision-making power (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–1.20), freedom from coercion (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52–1.67) or communication ability (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92–3.09).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Findings highlight the need to develop and validate a new measure for reproductive autonomy for populations outside the United States or to adapt the existing measure for these contexts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10655,"journal":{"name":"Contraception: X","volume":"1 ","pages":"Article 100011"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.conx.2019.100011","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590151619300103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Objective

Reproductive autonomy (i.e., power to control and decide about contraceptive use, pregnancy and childbearing) could determine a woman’s capacity to use contraception. Although the Reproductive Autonomy Scale was developed to quantitatively assess women’s reproductive autonomy, it has not been validated in any population outside the United States.

Study design

We conducted a cross-sectional study of reproductive-age, sexually active women in Hanoi, Vietnam, who did not desire pregnancy. We administered a questionnaire containing the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and calculated composite scores of the measure’s three subscales: (1) decision-making power, (2) freedom from coercion and (3) communication ability. To assess internal consistency, we calculated Cronbach’s alpha score for each subscale. We used logistic regression to evaluate differences in subscale scores between women who did and did not engage in unprotected sex in the past month.

Results

Analysis is based on 500 participants; of these women, 17% (n = 85) engaged in unprotected sex in the past month. Subscales had moderate to high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.65–0.87). Mean subscale scores did not vary between women who did and did not engage in recent unprotected sex. Unprotected sex in the past month was not associated with decision-making power (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49–1.20), freedom from coercion (aOR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.52–1.67) or communication ability (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.92–3.09).

Conclusion

Findings highlight the need to develop and validate a new measure for reproductive autonomy for populations outside the United States or to adapt the existing measure for these contexts.

Abstract Image

越南河内妇女的生殖自主和避孕措施的使用
目的生育自主权(即控制和决定避孕药具使用、怀孕和生育的权力)可以决定妇女使用避孕药具的能力。虽然制定生殖自主量表是为了定量评估妇女的生殖自主,但它尚未在美国以外的任何人口中得到验证。研究设计我们对越南河内的育龄、性活跃、不希望怀孕的妇女进行了一项横断面研究。我们进行了一份包含生殖自主量表的问卷调查,并计算了该量表的三个子量表的综合得分:(1)决策权,(2)免于胁迫的自由和(3)沟通能力。为了评估内部一致性,我们计算了每个子量表的Cronbach 's alpha分数。我们使用逻辑回归来评估在过去一个月中有和没有进行无保护的性行为的妇女之间的亚量表得分的差异。结果分析基于500名参与者;在这些妇女中,17% (n = 85)在过去一个月内进行了无保护措施的性行为。子量表具有中等至高度的内部一致性(Cronbach 's alpha: 0.65-0.87)。最近有和没有进行无保护措施性行为的妇女的平均分量表得分没有变化。过去一个月内无保护措施的性行为与决策权无关(调整优势比[aOR], 0.77;95%可信区间[CI], 0.49-1.20),不受胁迫(aOR, 0.94;95% CI, 0.52-1.67)或沟通能力(aOR, 1.69;95% ci, 0.92-3.09)。结论研究结果表明,有必要为美国以外的人口开发和验证一种新的生殖自主措施,或者根据这些情况调整现有措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Contraception: X
Contraception: X Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信