CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT.

Ryan Koeppen, Dagmar Sternad, Meghan E Huber, Neville Hogan
{"title":"CONTROLLING PHYSICAL INTERACTIONS: HUMANS DO NOT MINIMIZE MUSCLE EFFORT.","authors":"Ryan Koeppen,&nbsp;Dagmar Sternad,&nbsp;Meghan E Huber,&nbsp;Neville Hogan","doi":"10.1115/DSCC2017-5202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central nervous system coordinates the musculo-skeletal system to minimize muscle effort. In this paper, we tested if this notion holds true for motor tasks that involve physical interaction. Specifically, we investigated whether humans minimize muscle forces to control physical interaction with a circular kinematic constraint. Using a simplified arm model, we derived three predictions for how humans should behave if they were minimizing muscular effort to perform the task. First, we predicted that subjects would exert workless, radial forces on the constraint. Second, we predicted that the muscles would be deactivated when they could not contribute to work. Third, we predicted that when moving very slowly along the constraint, the pattern of muscle activity would not differ between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) motions. To test these predictions, we instructed human subjects to move a robot handle around a virtual, circular constraint at a constant tangential velocity. To reduce the effect of forces that might arise from incomplete compensation of neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics, the target tangential speed was set to an extremely slow pace (~1 revolution every 13.3 seconds). Ultimately, the results of human experiment did not support the predictions derived from our model of minimizing muscular effort. While subjects did exert workless forces, they did not deactivate muscles as predicted. Furthermore, muscle activation patterns differed between CW and CCW motions about the constraint. These findings demonstrate that minimizing muscle effort is not a significant factor in human performance of this constrained-motion task. Instead, the central nervous system likely prioritizes reducing other costs, such as computational effort, over muscle effort to control physical interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":90691,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","volume":"2017 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1115/DSCC2017-5202","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DSCC2017-5202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Physical interaction with tools is ubiquitous in functional activities of daily living. While tool use is considered a hallmark of human behavior, how humans control such physical interactions is still poorly understood. When humans perform a motor task, it is commonly suggested that the central nervous system coordinates the musculo-skeletal system to minimize muscle effort. In this paper, we tested if this notion holds true for motor tasks that involve physical interaction. Specifically, we investigated whether humans minimize muscle forces to control physical interaction with a circular kinematic constraint. Using a simplified arm model, we derived three predictions for how humans should behave if they were minimizing muscular effort to perform the task. First, we predicted that subjects would exert workless, radial forces on the constraint. Second, we predicted that the muscles would be deactivated when they could not contribute to work. Third, we predicted that when moving very slowly along the constraint, the pattern of muscle activity would not differ between clockwise (CW) and counterclockwise (CCW) motions. To test these predictions, we instructed human subjects to move a robot handle around a virtual, circular constraint at a constant tangential velocity. To reduce the effect of forces that might arise from incomplete compensation of neuro-musculoskeletal dynamics, the target tangential speed was set to an extremely slow pace (~1 revolution every 13.3 seconds). Ultimately, the results of human experiment did not support the predictions derived from our model of minimizing muscular effort. While subjects did exert workless forces, they did not deactivate muscles as predicted. Furthermore, muscle activation patterns differed between CW and CCW motions about the constraint. These findings demonstrate that minimizing muscle effort is not a significant factor in human performance of this constrained-motion task. Instead, the central nervous system likely prioritizes reducing other costs, such as computational effort, over muscle effort to control physical interactions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

控制身体的相互作用:人类不会减少肌肉的消耗。
在日常生活的功能活动中,与工具的物理交互无处不在。虽然使用工具被认为是人类行为的标志,但人类如何控制这种身体互动仍然知之甚少。当人类执行运动任务时,通常认为中枢神经系统协调肌肉骨骼系统以减少肌肉的消耗。在本文中,我们测试了这一概念是否适用于涉及身体互动的运动任务。具体来说,我们研究了人类是否最小化肌肉力量来控制与圆形运动学约束的物理相互作用。使用一个简化的手臂模型,我们得出了三个预测,如果人类在完成任务时尽量减少肌肉的消耗,他们应该如何表现。首先,我们预测受试者会对约束施加无功的径向力。其次,我们预测,当肌肉不能为工作做出贡献时,它们就会被停用。第三,我们预测,当沿着约束缓慢移动时,肌肉活动模式在顺时针(CW)和逆时针(CCW)运动之间没有区别。为了验证这些预测,我们指示人类受试者以恒定的切向速度围绕一个虚拟的圆形约束移动机器人手柄。为了减少神经-肌肉-骨骼动力学不完全补偿可能产生的力的影响,将目标切向速度设置为极慢的速度(每13.3秒转1圈)。最终,人体实验的结果并不支持我们从最小化肌肉努力模型中得出的预测。虽然实验对象确实施加了无用的力量,但他们并没有像预期的那样使肌肉失去活动。此外,连续运动和连续运动对约束的肌肉激活模式存在差异。这些发现表明,减少肌肉的努力并不是人类完成这种限制性运动任务的重要因素。相反,中枢神经系统可能会优先考虑减少其他成本,比如计算能力,而不是肌肉控制身体相互作用的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信