In the eye of the beholder: Considering culture in assessing the social desirability of personality.

The Journal of applied psychology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-05-28 DOI:10.1037/apl0000514
Ann Marie Ryan, Jacob Bradburn, Sarena Bhatia, Evan Beals, Anthony S Boyce, Nicholas Martin, Jeff Conway
{"title":"In the eye of the beholder: Considering culture in assessing the social desirability of personality.","authors":"Ann Marie Ryan,&nbsp;Jacob Bradburn,&nbsp;Sarena Bhatia,&nbsp;Evan Beals,&nbsp;Anthony S Boyce,&nbsp;Nicholas Martin,&nbsp;Jeff Conway","doi":"10.1037/apl0000514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multinational organizations are increasingly looking to deploy assessments on a global basis. However, the social desirability of different personality characteristics may vary as a function of culture, yet limited research has explored this idea. Based on the GLOBE cultural dimensions and the theory of purposeful behavior, we examined potential connections between cultural practice dimensions and the desirability of personality aspects with a large personality item bank, utilizing raters across 34 countries. Findings indicated few connections of societal level cultural practices and social desirability perceptions for particular aspects. An exception to this was the finding that higher social desirability ratings were given for cooperativeness, sensitivity, and assertiveness in Confucian Asian, South Asian, and Sub-Saharan contexts compared with Germanic Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Latin Europe contexts. Limitations of the study as well as implications for development and use of personality assessments globally in high stakes contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":169654,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of applied psychology","volume":" ","pages":"452-466"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of applied psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Multinational organizations are increasingly looking to deploy assessments on a global basis. However, the social desirability of different personality characteristics may vary as a function of culture, yet limited research has explored this idea. Based on the GLOBE cultural dimensions and the theory of purposeful behavior, we examined potential connections between cultural practice dimensions and the desirability of personality aspects with a large personality item bank, utilizing raters across 34 countries. Findings indicated few connections of societal level cultural practices and social desirability perceptions for particular aspects. An exception to this was the finding that higher social desirability ratings were given for cooperativeness, sensitivity, and assertiveness in Confucian Asian, South Asian, and Sub-Saharan contexts compared with Germanic Europe, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and Latin Europe contexts. Limitations of the study as well as implications for development and use of personality assessments globally in high stakes contexts are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

在旁观者的眼中:在评估个性的社会可取性时考虑文化。
跨国组织越来越希望在全球范围内部署评估。然而,由于文化的作用,不同人格特征的社会可取性可能会有所不同,但对这一观点的研究有限。基于GLOBE文化维度和目的行为理论,我们利用34个国家的评分者,利用大型人格项目库,研究了文化实践维度与人格方面可取性之间的潜在联系。研究结果表明,在特定方面,社会层面的文化习俗和社会可取性观念之间的联系很少。一个例外是,与日耳曼欧洲、东欧、拉丁美洲和拉丁欧洲相比,亚洲、南亚和撒哈拉以南地区的儒家社会对合作、敏感和自信的社会期望评分更高。本文还讨论了本研究的局限性以及对高风险环境下全球人格评估发展和使用的启示。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信