Subconjunctival Aflibercept for the Treatment of Formed Corneal Neovascularization.

Ruti Sella, Meydan Ben Ishai, Eitan Livny, Yoav Nahum, Irit Bahar
{"title":"Subconjunctival Aflibercept for the Treatment of Formed Corneal Neovascularization.","authors":"Ruti Sella,&nbsp;Meydan Ben Ishai,&nbsp;Eitan Livny,&nbsp;Yoav Nahum,&nbsp;Irit Bahar","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of a single subconjunctival aflibercept injection on formed corneal neovascularization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective clinical trial, conducted at a single tertiary medical center. Included were consecutive patients with corneal pathologies complicated by corneal neovascularization, who were candidates for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment at the discretion of a cornea specialist. A single subconjunctival injection of 0.08 mL of Aflibercept (Eylea 25 mg/mL) was administered near the limbus in proximity to the areas of maximal pathological neovascularization. Follow-up visits were scheduled on days 7, 30, 60, and 90 following injection. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slitlamp examination, digital cornea photography, specular microscopy, and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography were documented at each visit. The images were graded by a masked observer for density, extent, and centricity of corneal vascularization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six eyes of six patients were analyzed. No clinically significant ocular or systemic adverse events were documented. No change was noted in extent, density, or centricity of corneal blood vessels at seven, 30, and 90 days after injection (P>0.1 for all time point comparisons, Friedman test). Best-corrected visual acuity fluctuated insignificantly in 5/6 patients during follow-up time, and objective but not subjective improvement of BCVA was noted in one patient with no concurrent change of neovascularization. The recruitment has therefore halted prematurely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single subconjunctival aflibercept injection seems to be well tolerated. However, it is ineffective for regressing formed corneal neovascularization.</p>","PeriodicalId":502139,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens","volume":" ","pages":"180-184"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of a single subconjunctival aflibercept injection on formed corneal neovascularization.

Methods: A prospective clinical trial, conducted at a single tertiary medical center. Included were consecutive patients with corneal pathologies complicated by corneal neovascularization, who were candidates for anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment at the discretion of a cornea specialist. A single subconjunctival injection of 0.08 mL of Aflibercept (Eylea 25 mg/mL) was administered near the limbus in proximity to the areas of maximal pathological neovascularization. Follow-up visits were scheduled on days 7, 30, 60, and 90 following injection. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure, slitlamp examination, digital cornea photography, specular microscopy, and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography were documented at each visit. The images were graded by a masked observer for density, extent, and centricity of corneal vascularization.

Results: Six eyes of six patients were analyzed. No clinically significant ocular or systemic adverse events were documented. No change was noted in extent, density, or centricity of corneal blood vessels at seven, 30, and 90 days after injection (P>0.1 for all time point comparisons, Friedman test). Best-corrected visual acuity fluctuated insignificantly in 5/6 patients during follow-up time, and objective but not subjective improvement of BCVA was noted in one patient with no concurrent change of neovascularization. The recruitment has therefore halted prematurely.

Conclusions: A single subconjunctival aflibercept injection seems to be well tolerated. However, it is ineffective for regressing formed corneal neovascularization.

结膜下抗凝血剂治疗已形成的角膜新生血管。
目的:评价单次结膜下注射阿布西贝对已形成的角膜新生血管的影响。方法:一项前瞻性临床试验,在单一三级医疗中心进行。纳入了连续的角膜病变合并角膜新生血管的患者,这些患者在角膜专科医生的指导下接受抗血管内皮生长因子治疗。单次结膜下注射0.08 mL afliberceept (Eylea 25 mg/mL),在靠近最大病理性新生血管区域的边缘处注射。随访安排在注射后第7、30、60和90天。每次就诊时记录最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼内压、裂隙灯检查、数字角膜摄影、反射显微镜和前段光学相干断层扫描。图像由一个蒙面观察者对角膜血管化的密度、范围和中心性进行分级。结果:对6例患者的6只眼进行了分析。没有临床显著的眼部或全身不良事件记录。注射后7、30和90天,角膜血管的范围、密度或中心性均无变化(弗里德曼检验,所有时间点比较P>0.1)。在随访期间,5/6例患者的最佳矫正视力波动不显著,1例患者BCVA客观而非主观改善,未并发新生血管改变。因此,征聘工作过早地停止了。结论:单次结膜下注射阿布西贝似乎耐受性良好。然而,它对恢复已形成的角膜新生血管是无效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书